荷兰非正规护理的正规化

T. V. D. Broek
{"title":"荷兰非正规护理的正规化","authors":"T. V. D. Broek","doi":"10.2979/INTJFEMAPPBIO.6.2.185","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In order to contain public care expenditure, policy makers in the Netherlands have over the last decades formulated in ever more stringent ways what ought to be expected from spouses, partners and family members with regard to care for dependent relatives. The current Dutch coalition cabinet plans to shift the principal responsibility for non-medical care, including demanding forms of care such as long-term personal care, to individuals and families. I argue that these policy developments imply cost redistribution rather than cost containment and that this redistribution is disadvantageous for women.","PeriodicalId":44698,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Feminist Approaches To Bioethics","volume":"95 4 1","pages":"185-193"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2013-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Formalization of informal care in the Netherlands\",\"authors\":\"T. V. D. Broek\",\"doi\":\"10.2979/INTJFEMAPPBIO.6.2.185\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In order to contain public care expenditure, policy makers in the Netherlands have over the last decades formulated in ever more stringent ways what ought to be expected from spouses, partners and family members with regard to care for dependent relatives. The current Dutch coalition cabinet plans to shift the principal responsibility for non-medical care, including demanding forms of care such as long-term personal care, to individuals and families. I argue that these policy developments imply cost redistribution rather than cost containment and that this redistribution is disadvantageous for women.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44698,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Feminist Approaches To Bioethics\",\"volume\":\"95 4 1\",\"pages\":\"185-193\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Feminist Approaches To Bioethics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2979/INTJFEMAPPBIO.6.2.185\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ETHICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Feminist Approaches To Bioethics","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2979/INTJFEMAPPBIO.6.2.185","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

为了控制公共护理开支,在过去几十年里,荷兰的决策者以越来越严格的方式制定了配偶、伴侣和家庭成员在照顾受抚养亲属方面应该得到的期望。目前的荷兰联合内阁计划将非医疗护理的主要责任,包括长期个人护理等要求很高的护理形式,转移给个人和家庭。我认为,这些政策发展意味着成本再分配,而不是成本控制,这种再分配对妇女不利。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Formalization of informal care in the Netherlands
In order to contain public care expenditure, policy makers in the Netherlands have over the last decades formulated in ever more stringent ways what ought to be expected from spouses, partners and family members with regard to care for dependent relatives. The current Dutch coalition cabinet plans to shift the principal responsibility for non-medical care, including demanding forms of care such as long-term personal care, to individuals and families. I argue that these policy developments imply cost redistribution rather than cost containment and that this redistribution is disadvantageous for women.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
14.30%
发文量
56
期刊最新文献
Male Fertility-Related mHealth: Does It Create New Vulnerabilities? The Responsibility Objection to Thomson Re-imagined: What If Men Were Held to a Parallel Standard? Autonomy Without Borders? Understanding the Impact of Undocumented Residence Status on Healthcare Relationships in Belgium Abortion to Abolition: Reproductive Health and Justice in Canada by Martha Paynter What Feminist Bioethics Can Bring to Synthetic Biology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1