模拟在产科紧急情况下的好处:什么级别的证据?

P. Raynal
{"title":"模拟在产科紧急情况下的好处:什么级别的证据?","authors":"P. Raynal","doi":"10.1016/j.gyobfe.2016.08.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Simulation in obstetrical emergency is in expansion. The important economic and human cost in simulation needs a real evaluation about enhancement in technical and non-technical skills, maternal and neonatal morbidity and mortality. We present a literature review of the results published on the subject in shoulder dystocia, post-partum haemorrhage, eclampsia and cord prolaps with a selection of publications with high evidence level or positive impact of training on obstetrical emergencies. There are few publications with a positive impact of training on obstetrical emergencies. Some publications from 10<!--> <!-->years by the same obstetrical team for training and shoulder dystocia reveal a 75% reduction in brachial plexus injury after 4<!--> <!-->years of training, and 100% reduction in permanent injury after a decade of training. Only one publication is in accordance with a reduction of severe post-partum haemorrhage with training. For all obstetrical emergencies, crew resource management (communication, self-confidence…) and team training are improved.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":55077,"journal":{"name":"Gynecologie Obstetrique & Fertilite","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.gyobfe.2016.08.001","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bénéfices de la simulation en situations d’urgences obstétricales : quels niveaux de preuve ?\",\"authors\":\"P. Raynal\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.gyobfe.2016.08.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Simulation in obstetrical emergency is in expansion. The important economic and human cost in simulation needs a real evaluation about enhancement in technical and non-technical skills, maternal and neonatal morbidity and mortality. We present a literature review of the results published on the subject in shoulder dystocia, post-partum haemorrhage, eclampsia and cord prolaps with a selection of publications with high evidence level or positive impact of training on obstetrical emergencies. There are few publications with a positive impact of training on obstetrical emergencies. Some publications from 10<!--> <!-->years by the same obstetrical team for training and shoulder dystocia reveal a 75% reduction in brachial plexus injury after 4<!--> <!-->years of training, and 100% reduction in permanent injury after a decade of training. Only one publication is in accordance with a reduction of severe post-partum haemorrhage with training. For all obstetrical emergencies, crew resource management (communication, self-confidence…) and team training are improved.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55077,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Gynecologie Obstetrique & Fertilite\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.gyobfe.2016.08.001\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Gynecologie Obstetrique & Fertilite\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1297958916302090\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gynecologie Obstetrique & Fertilite","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1297958916302090","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

模拟产科急诊正在扩大。模拟的重要经济和人力成本需要对技术和非技术技能、产妇和新生儿发病率和死亡率的提高进行真正的评价。我们对发表的关于肩难产、产后出血、子痫和脐带脱垂的研究结果进行了文献回顾,并选择了具有高证据水平或对产科急诊培训有积极影响的出版物。很少有出版物对产科急诊培训有积极影响。同一产科团队10年来关于训练和肩部难产的一些出版物显示,经过4年的训练,臂丛损伤减少了75%,经过10年的训练,永久性损伤减少了100%。只有一份出版物是根据培训减少严重产后出血。对于所有产科急诊,机组资源管理(沟通、自信……)和团队培训都得到了改善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Bénéfices de la simulation en situations d’urgences obstétricales : quels niveaux de preuve ?

Simulation in obstetrical emergency is in expansion. The important economic and human cost in simulation needs a real evaluation about enhancement in technical and non-technical skills, maternal and neonatal morbidity and mortality. We present a literature review of the results published on the subject in shoulder dystocia, post-partum haemorrhage, eclampsia and cord prolaps with a selection of publications with high evidence level or positive impact of training on obstetrical emergencies. There are few publications with a positive impact of training on obstetrical emergencies. Some publications from 10 years by the same obstetrical team for training and shoulder dystocia reveal a 75% reduction in brachial plexus injury after 4 years of training, and 100% reduction in permanent injury after a decade of training. Only one publication is in accordance with a reduction of severe post-partum haemorrhage with training. For all obstetrical emergencies, crew resource management (communication, self-confidence…) and team training are improved.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊最新文献
[Hysterosonography]. Editorial Board Cancer du sein et diabète de type 2 : des interactions complexes [Does the use of deodorant cause breast cancer? It remains to be proved]. Tumors in recent Prehistory. Contributions from Cova des Pas (Menorca Island).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1