基于ROST CM6.0内容挖掘系统的《中华人民共和国学前教育法草案(征求意见稿)》内容分析

Q3 Social Sciences Chinese Education and Society Pub Date : 2021-03-04 DOI:10.1080/10611932.2021.1949208
Beibei Zhang, Yong Jiang, Jie Zhou
{"title":"基于ROST CM6.0内容挖掘系统的《中华人民共和国学前教育法草案(征求意见稿)》内容分析","authors":"Beibei Zhang, Yong Jiang, Jie Zhou","doi":"10.1080/10611932.2021.1949208","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract: Taking the text of the “Draft of the Preschool Education Law of the People’s Republic of China (Draft for Solicitation of Comments)” released in September 2020 as the object of research, this article took a content analysis method and used the text analysis software of the ROST CM6.0 content mining system to analyze the text’s keywords, core terms and specific content. It discussed in depth the draft law’s response to restraints on the development of preschool education in China, addressing core issues such as the provision of resources in preschool education, government coordination mechanisms, and the improvement of preschool education quality. It emphasized the supply side as the starting point to standardize and expand the supply of resources for preschool education. It put needs at the core, together with guaranteeing the basics, focusing points, and paying attention to the quality of preschool education. It took the clarification of powers and responsibilities as a foothold, and a mechanism that runs through the development of preschool education. By analyzing the value positions behind the draft, it found that it taking people-centered, child-oriented, quality-based, government-led, and putting the disadvantaged first as the value standpoint. It then provided support for the reasonable interpretation and promotion of the improvement of the draft. However, the draft also reflected some problems, such as the excessive use of the term of principle “should,” the lack of necessary procedural content in some items, and the insufficient response to conflicts in value positions between different stakeholders. Based on this, the article proposed some suggestions for revising the draft: to rely on the cooperation of different teams to highlight the rule of law; to grasp the core benchmark based on the feedback of interest groups; and to highlight the macro perspective based on the national development strategy.","PeriodicalId":39911,"journal":{"name":"Chinese Education and Society","volume":"185 1","pages":"1 - 20"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analysis of the Contents of the “Draft of the Preschool Education Law of the People’s Republic Of China (Draft for Solicitation of Comments)” Based on the ROST CM6.0 Content Mining System\",\"authors\":\"Beibei Zhang, Yong Jiang, Jie Zhou\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10611932.2021.1949208\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract: Taking the text of the “Draft of the Preschool Education Law of the People’s Republic of China (Draft for Solicitation of Comments)” released in September 2020 as the object of research, this article took a content analysis method and used the text analysis software of the ROST CM6.0 content mining system to analyze the text’s keywords, core terms and specific content. It discussed in depth the draft law’s response to restraints on the development of preschool education in China, addressing core issues such as the provision of resources in preschool education, government coordination mechanisms, and the improvement of preschool education quality. It emphasized the supply side as the starting point to standardize and expand the supply of resources for preschool education. It put needs at the core, together with guaranteeing the basics, focusing points, and paying attention to the quality of preschool education. It took the clarification of powers and responsibilities as a foothold, and a mechanism that runs through the development of preschool education. By analyzing the value positions behind the draft, it found that it taking people-centered, child-oriented, quality-based, government-led, and putting the disadvantaged first as the value standpoint. It then provided support for the reasonable interpretation and promotion of the improvement of the draft. However, the draft also reflected some problems, such as the excessive use of the term of principle “should,” the lack of necessary procedural content in some items, and the insufficient response to conflicts in value positions between different stakeholders. Based on this, the article proposed some suggestions for revising the draft: to rely on the cooperation of different teams to highlight the rule of law; to grasp the core benchmark based on the feedback of interest groups; and to highlight the macro perspective based on the national development strategy.\",\"PeriodicalId\":39911,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Chinese Education and Society\",\"volume\":\"185 1\",\"pages\":\"1 - 20\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-03-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Chinese Education and Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10611932.2021.1949208\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chinese Education and Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10611932.2021.1949208","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

摘要:本文以2020年9月发布的《中华人民共和国学前教育法草案(征求意见稿)》文本为研究对象,采用内容分析法,利用ROST CM6.0内容挖掘系统的文本分析软件,对文本的关键词、核心术语和具体内容进行分析。它深入讨论了法律草案对中国学前教育发展制约因素的回应,解决了学前教育资源提供、政府协调机制、提高学前教育质量等核心问题。强调以供给侧为出发点,规范和扩大学前教育资源供给。坚持以需求为核心、保基础、保重点、保质量。它以明确权责为立足点,将权责明确作为贯穿学前教育发展的机制。通过分析草案背后的价值立场,发现草案以“以人为本”、“以儿童为本”、“以质量为本”、“政府主导”、“弱势群体优先”为价值立场。为合理解释和促进草案的完善提供了支持。但是,草案也反映出一些问题,如过多使用“应该”的原则用语,一些项目缺乏必要的程序性内容,对不同利益相关者之间的价值立场冲突反应不足等。在此基础上,本文提出了修改草案的几点建议:依靠不同团队的合作,突出法治;根据利益群体反馈,把握核心标杆;突出立足于国家发展战略的宏观视角。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Analysis of the Contents of the “Draft of the Preschool Education Law of the People’s Republic Of China (Draft for Solicitation of Comments)” Based on the ROST CM6.0 Content Mining System
Abstract: Taking the text of the “Draft of the Preschool Education Law of the People’s Republic of China (Draft for Solicitation of Comments)” released in September 2020 as the object of research, this article took a content analysis method and used the text analysis software of the ROST CM6.0 content mining system to analyze the text’s keywords, core terms and specific content. It discussed in depth the draft law’s response to restraints on the development of preschool education in China, addressing core issues such as the provision of resources in preschool education, government coordination mechanisms, and the improvement of preschool education quality. It emphasized the supply side as the starting point to standardize and expand the supply of resources for preschool education. It put needs at the core, together with guaranteeing the basics, focusing points, and paying attention to the quality of preschool education. It took the clarification of powers and responsibilities as a foothold, and a mechanism that runs through the development of preschool education. By analyzing the value positions behind the draft, it found that it taking people-centered, child-oriented, quality-based, government-led, and putting the disadvantaged first as the value standpoint. It then provided support for the reasonable interpretation and promotion of the improvement of the draft. However, the draft also reflected some problems, such as the excessive use of the term of principle “should,” the lack of necessary procedural content in some items, and the insufficient response to conflicts in value positions between different stakeholders. Based on this, the article proposed some suggestions for revising the draft: to rely on the cooperation of different teams to highlight the rule of law; to grasp the core benchmark based on the feedback of interest groups; and to highlight the macro perspective based on the national development strategy.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Chinese Education and Society
Chinese Education and Society Social Sciences-Sociology and Political Science
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
期刊介绍: How is China"s vast population being educated in the home, the school, and the workplace? Chinese Education and Society is essential for insight into the latest Chinese thinking on educational policy and practice, educational reform and development, pedagogical theory and methods, colleges and universities, schools and families, as well as the education for diverse social groups across gender and youth, urban and rural, mainstream and minorities. It features unabridged translations of the most important articles in the field from Chinese sources, including scholarly journals and collections of articles published in book form. It also provides refereed research on specific themes.
期刊最新文献
Chinese Citizen or Global Citizen? Nationalism and Cosmopolitanism at an International School in Beijing Family and Education across Social Contexts in China Parental Investment on a Socioeconomic Basis: A Comparative Study of Southeast China and Taiwan The Mediating Effects of Peer Relationship and Self-Esteem on the Relations Between Subjective Socioeconomic Status and Subjective Well-Being for High School Students The Absent Family and the Education among Contemporary Tibetan Students
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1