米歇尔·福柯在新冠肺炎大流行事件背景下的“生命政治”概念:理论和法律方面

L. Volokitina
{"title":"米歇尔·福柯在新冠肺炎大流行事件背景下的“生命政治”概念:理论和法律方面","authors":"L. Volokitina","doi":"10.35750/2071-8284-2023-2-19-25","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction. In the context of the recent COVID-19 pandemic events, Michel Foucault’s concept of “biopolitics” has received renewed attention. Its main idea is the desire to control not only and not so much the social, but also the biological side of human life – by a legitimate authority. \nThe aim of the article is to try to update the Foucault concept from the perspective of the general theory and philosophy of law. The article raises the question of how the actions of power institutions in the context of implementation of “biopolitics” correlate to the theoretical and legal concept of “the limits of legal regulation”. \nMethods. In addition to general scientific methods of cognition (comparison, analogy, analysis, synthesis, abstraction; collectively – general logical methods), this study applies the following special methods of legal sciences: dogmatic method (formal-legal), interpretation and problem-theoretical reconstruction. \nResults. The article concludes that in the process of implementation of ”biopolitical” strategies the theoretical and legal construction of “the limits of legal regulation” undergoes significant changes. From this perspective, the actions of governing bodies do not exceed the permissible limits of legal regulation. Michel Foucault’s concept of ‘biopolitics’ allows analysing legal phenomena without distancing from the facts of social reality.","PeriodicalId":43418,"journal":{"name":"Vestnik St Petersburg University-Mathematics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Michel Foucault’s concept of “biopolitics” in the context of the events of the COVID-19 pandemic: theoretical and legal aspects\",\"authors\":\"L. Volokitina\",\"doi\":\"10.35750/2071-8284-2023-2-19-25\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction. In the context of the recent COVID-19 pandemic events, Michel Foucault’s concept of “biopolitics” has received renewed attention. Its main idea is the desire to control not only and not so much the social, but also the biological side of human life – by a legitimate authority. \\nThe aim of the article is to try to update the Foucault concept from the perspective of the general theory and philosophy of law. The article raises the question of how the actions of power institutions in the context of implementation of “biopolitics” correlate to the theoretical and legal concept of “the limits of legal regulation”. \\nMethods. In addition to general scientific methods of cognition (comparison, analogy, analysis, synthesis, abstraction; collectively – general logical methods), this study applies the following special methods of legal sciences: dogmatic method (formal-legal), interpretation and problem-theoretical reconstruction. \\nResults. The article concludes that in the process of implementation of ”biopolitical” strategies the theoretical and legal construction of “the limits of legal regulation” undergoes significant changes. From this perspective, the actions of governing bodies do not exceed the permissible limits of legal regulation. Michel Foucault’s concept of ‘biopolitics’ allows analysing legal phenomena without distancing from the facts of social reality.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43418,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Vestnik St Petersburg University-Mathematics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Vestnik St Petersburg University-Mathematics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.35750/2071-8284-2023-2-19-25\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MATHEMATICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vestnik St Petersburg University-Mathematics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35750/2071-8284-2023-2-19-25","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MATHEMATICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

介绍。在最近新冠肺炎大流行事件的背景下,米歇尔·福柯的“生命政治”概念再次受到关注。它的主要思想是想要通过一个合法的权威来控制人类生活的社会方面和生物方面。本文的目的是试图从一般理论和法哲学的角度来更新福柯的概念。本文提出的问题是,在实施“生命政治”的背景下,权力机构的行为如何与“法律规制的限度”的理论和法律概念相关联。方法。除了一般的科学认知方法(比较、类比、分析、综合、抽象;本研究运用了以下法学的特殊方法:教条式方法(形式法)、解释和问题理论重构。结果。文章认为,在实施“生命政治”战略的过程中,“法律规制的限度”的理论和法律建构发生了重大变化。从这个角度来看,理事机构的行为没有超出法律规定的允许范围。米歇尔·福柯(Michel Foucault)的“生命政治”概念允许在不脱离社会现实事实的情况下分析法律现象。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Michel Foucault’s concept of “biopolitics” in the context of the events of the COVID-19 pandemic: theoretical and legal aspects
Introduction. In the context of the recent COVID-19 pandemic events, Michel Foucault’s concept of “biopolitics” has received renewed attention. Its main idea is the desire to control not only and not so much the social, but also the biological side of human life – by a legitimate authority. The aim of the article is to try to update the Foucault concept from the perspective of the general theory and philosophy of law. The article raises the question of how the actions of power institutions in the context of implementation of “biopolitics” correlate to the theoretical and legal concept of “the limits of legal regulation”. Methods. In addition to general scientific methods of cognition (comparison, analogy, analysis, synthesis, abstraction; collectively – general logical methods), this study applies the following special methods of legal sciences: dogmatic method (formal-legal), interpretation and problem-theoretical reconstruction. Results. The article concludes that in the process of implementation of ”biopolitical” strategies the theoretical and legal construction of “the limits of legal regulation” undergoes significant changes. From this perspective, the actions of governing bodies do not exceed the permissible limits of legal regulation. Michel Foucault’s concept of ‘biopolitics’ allows analysing legal phenomena without distancing from the facts of social reality.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
50.00%
发文量
44
期刊介绍: Vestnik St. Petersburg University, Mathematics  is a journal that publishes original contributions in all areas of fundamental and applied mathematics. It is the prime outlet for the findings of scientists from the Faculty of Mathematics and Mechanics of St. Petersburg State University. Articles of the journal cover the major areas of fundamental and applied mathematics. The following are the main subject headings: Mathematical Analysis; Higher Algebra and Numbers Theory; Higher Geometry; Differential Equations; Mathematical Physics; Computational Mathematics and Numerical Analysis; Statistical Simulation; Theoretical Cybernetics; Game Theory; Operations Research; Theory of Probability and Mathematical Statistics, and Mathematical Problems of Mechanics and Astronomy.
期刊最新文献
Solution of the Local-Boundary-Value Problem of Control for a Nonlinear Stationary System Taking into Account Computer System Verification On the Approximation of the Attraction Field of a Rigid Body by the Attraction Field of Four Material Points of the Same Mass Rigid-Body Dynamics from the Euler Equations to the Attitude Control of Spacecraft in the Works of Scientists from St. Petersburg State University. Part 2 Regression Models for Calculating State-to-State Coefficients of the Rate of Vibrational Energy Exchanges Astronomical Research at the Mathematics Faculty of St. Petersburg University, I
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1