利用Flowloop和现场数据预测天然气水合物堵塞风险的机器学习模型

Hao Qin, V. Srivastava, Hua Wang, L. Zerpa, C. Koh
{"title":"利用Flowloop和现场数据预测天然气水合物堵塞风险的机器学习模型","authors":"Hao Qin, V. Srivastava, Hua Wang, L. Zerpa, C. Koh","doi":"10.4043/29411-MS","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Recently the concept of \"no external gas hydrate control measures\" has been proposed, whereby gas hydrate formation can occur in oil and gas subsea pipelines during steady state and transient operations, with the operational window defined by predictive analytic tools. Flow assurance engineers routinely use computer programs, including transient multiphase flow simulators coupled to a gas hydrate kinetics model to simulate gas hydrate formation and transportability. Given the complexity in multiphase flow modeling, modern machine learning technologies, especially artificial intelligence, could be applied to solve high-level, non-linear problems, such as evaluating gas hydrate risk based on measurable process parameters.\n In this work, several machine learning techniques, such as regression, classification, feature learning with an algorithm/framework like support vector machine (SVM) and neural networks (NN), are applied to analyze the data sets on: 1) hydrate tests conducted at pilot-scale flowloop facilities (4,500 data points), as well as 2) transient operation field data. The classification/regression model based on flowloop test data uses several independent input variables (features), such as water cut, gas-oil ratio, hydrate particle cohesive force, fluid velocity, oil viscosity, specific gravity, interfacial tension, and time in the hydrate stable zone, to output the hydrate fraction and probability of hydrate plugging in the pipeline. The semi-supervised learning model was applied based on the field data use as input, including water cut, shut-down time (where applicable), and gas-oil ratio to determine the level of hydrate resistance to flow during restart or dead oil displacement after production shut-down.\n The flowloop based machine learning model exhibited good prediction accuracies in test and validation processes, and was used to assess the hydrate risks in an actual field. The field data based machine learning model demonstrated the ability to construct field risk maps.\n The machine learning technique could be potentially applied in hydrate management to evaluate hydrate risks in subsea oil/gas pipelines. As a complement to more complex transient multiphase flow simulations, this machine learning approach can aid in the development of advanced hydrate management strategies.","PeriodicalId":11149,"journal":{"name":"Day 1 Mon, May 06, 2019","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Machine Learning Models to Predict Gas Hydrate Plugging Risks Using Flowloop and Field Data\",\"authors\":\"Hao Qin, V. Srivastava, Hua Wang, L. Zerpa, C. Koh\",\"doi\":\"10.4043/29411-MS\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Recently the concept of \\\"no external gas hydrate control measures\\\" has been proposed, whereby gas hydrate formation can occur in oil and gas subsea pipelines during steady state and transient operations, with the operational window defined by predictive analytic tools. Flow assurance engineers routinely use computer programs, including transient multiphase flow simulators coupled to a gas hydrate kinetics model to simulate gas hydrate formation and transportability. Given the complexity in multiphase flow modeling, modern machine learning technologies, especially artificial intelligence, could be applied to solve high-level, non-linear problems, such as evaluating gas hydrate risk based on measurable process parameters.\\n In this work, several machine learning techniques, such as regression, classification, feature learning with an algorithm/framework like support vector machine (SVM) and neural networks (NN), are applied to analyze the data sets on: 1) hydrate tests conducted at pilot-scale flowloop facilities (4,500 data points), as well as 2) transient operation field data. The classification/regression model based on flowloop test data uses several independent input variables (features), such as water cut, gas-oil ratio, hydrate particle cohesive force, fluid velocity, oil viscosity, specific gravity, interfacial tension, and time in the hydrate stable zone, to output the hydrate fraction and probability of hydrate plugging in the pipeline. The semi-supervised learning model was applied based on the field data use as input, including water cut, shut-down time (where applicable), and gas-oil ratio to determine the level of hydrate resistance to flow during restart or dead oil displacement after production shut-down.\\n The flowloop based machine learning model exhibited good prediction accuracies in test and validation processes, and was used to assess the hydrate risks in an actual field. The field data based machine learning model demonstrated the ability to construct field risk maps.\\n The machine learning technique could be potentially applied in hydrate management to evaluate hydrate risks in subsea oil/gas pipelines. As a complement to more complex transient multiphase flow simulations, this machine learning approach can aid in the development of advanced hydrate management strategies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":11149,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Day 1 Mon, May 06, 2019\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-04-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"10\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Day 1 Mon, May 06, 2019\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4043/29411-MS\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 1 Mon, May 06, 2019","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4043/29411-MS","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

摘要

最近提出了“无外部天然气水合物控制措施”的概念,即油气海底管道在稳态和瞬态运行期间可能会形成天然气水合物,其运行窗口由预测分析工具定义。流动保证工程师通常使用计算机程序,包括瞬态多相流模拟器与天然气水合物动力学模型耦合,以模拟天然气水合物的形成和可输送性。考虑到多相流建模的复杂性,现代机器学习技术,特别是人工智能,可以应用于解决高层次的非线性问题,例如基于可测量过程参数评估天然气水合物风险。在这项工作中,几种机器学习技术,如回归、分类、基于支持向量机(SVM)和神经网络(NN)等算法/框架的特征学习,应用于分析以下数据集:1)在中试规模流环设施进行的水合物测试(4,500个数据点),以及2)瞬态操作现场数据。基于流环试验数据的分类/回归模型,采用含水率、气油比、水合物颗粒黏结力、流体速度、油粘度、比重、界面张力、水合物稳定区停留时间等独立输入变量(特征),输出水合物占比和水合物堵塞管道的概率。半监督学习模型基于现场数据作为输入,包括含水率、关停时间(如适用)和油气比,以确定重新启动或关停后的死油置换期间水合物的流动阻力水平。基于流环的机器学习模型在测试和验证过程中显示出良好的预测精度,并用于评估实际油田的水合物风险。基于现场数据的机器学习模型展示了构建现场风险图的能力。机器学习技术可以潜在地应用于水合物管理,以评估海底油气管道中的水合物风险。作为更复杂的瞬态多相流模拟的补充,这种机器学习方法可以帮助开发先进的水合物管理策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Machine Learning Models to Predict Gas Hydrate Plugging Risks Using Flowloop and Field Data
Recently the concept of "no external gas hydrate control measures" has been proposed, whereby gas hydrate formation can occur in oil and gas subsea pipelines during steady state and transient operations, with the operational window defined by predictive analytic tools. Flow assurance engineers routinely use computer programs, including transient multiphase flow simulators coupled to a gas hydrate kinetics model to simulate gas hydrate formation and transportability. Given the complexity in multiphase flow modeling, modern machine learning technologies, especially artificial intelligence, could be applied to solve high-level, non-linear problems, such as evaluating gas hydrate risk based on measurable process parameters. In this work, several machine learning techniques, such as regression, classification, feature learning with an algorithm/framework like support vector machine (SVM) and neural networks (NN), are applied to analyze the data sets on: 1) hydrate tests conducted at pilot-scale flowloop facilities (4,500 data points), as well as 2) transient operation field data. The classification/regression model based on flowloop test data uses several independent input variables (features), such as water cut, gas-oil ratio, hydrate particle cohesive force, fluid velocity, oil viscosity, specific gravity, interfacial tension, and time in the hydrate stable zone, to output the hydrate fraction and probability of hydrate plugging in the pipeline. The semi-supervised learning model was applied based on the field data use as input, including water cut, shut-down time (where applicable), and gas-oil ratio to determine the level of hydrate resistance to flow during restart or dead oil displacement after production shut-down. The flowloop based machine learning model exhibited good prediction accuracies in test and validation processes, and was used to assess the hydrate risks in an actual field. The field data based machine learning model demonstrated the ability to construct field risk maps. The machine learning technique could be potentially applied in hydrate management to evaluate hydrate risks in subsea oil/gas pipelines. As a complement to more complex transient multiphase flow simulations, this machine learning approach can aid in the development of advanced hydrate management strategies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Detailed Look into the 2017 SNAME OC-8 Comparative Wind Load Study A Family of Practical Foundation Models for Dynamic Analyses of Offshore Wind Turbines Turret-Moored FPSO Yaw Motions in a Squall-Prone Region Ultra-Long Subsea Gas Condensate Tie Back – Pseudo Dry Gas – Liquid Handling System Deepwater Opportunities Extra Long Oil Tiebacks Developments
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1