庆祝启蒙运动的终结:人类世和盖亚时代的组织理论(以及为什么两者都不能解决我们的生态危机)

IF 1.8 4区 管理学 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory Pub Date : 2021-06-30 DOI:10.1177/26317877211036714
S. Banerjee, Diane-Laure Arjaliès
{"title":"庆祝启蒙运动的终结:人类世和盖亚时代的组织理论(以及为什么两者都不能解决我们的生态危机)","authors":"S. Banerjee, Diane-Laure Arjaliès","doi":"10.1177/26317877211036714","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article aims to change the terms of the conversation about the ecological crisis. We argue that the human–nature dualism, a product of Enlightenment thought and primarily responsible for the ecological crisis, cannot be the basis for any meaningful solutions. We show how more recent Western imaginaries like the Anthropocene and Gaia proposed to overcome the separation of nature from culture are also based on exclusions that reflect Enlightenment rationality and legacies of colonialism. In sharp contrast, we show that Indigenous philosophies that preceded the Enlightenment by thousands of years have developed systems of knowledge based on a relational ontology that reflects profound connections between humans and nature. We demonstrate that such forms of knowledge have been systematically subjugated by Western scholarship based on arguments inspired by Enlightenment ideals of rationality and empiricism. A decolonial imagination will be able to generate new insights into understanding and addressing the ecological crisis. We therefore call for organization and management scholars to challenge the anthropomorphic biases and the economism that dominates our field through a respectful engagement with Indigenous worldviews.","PeriodicalId":50648,"journal":{"name":"Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory","volume":"34 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"26","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Celebrating the End of Enlightenment: Organization Theory in the Age of the Anthropocene and Gaia (and why neither is the solution to our ecological crisis)\",\"authors\":\"S. Banerjee, Diane-Laure Arjaliès\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/26317877211036714\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article aims to change the terms of the conversation about the ecological crisis. We argue that the human–nature dualism, a product of Enlightenment thought and primarily responsible for the ecological crisis, cannot be the basis for any meaningful solutions. We show how more recent Western imaginaries like the Anthropocene and Gaia proposed to overcome the separation of nature from culture are also based on exclusions that reflect Enlightenment rationality and legacies of colonialism. In sharp contrast, we show that Indigenous philosophies that preceded the Enlightenment by thousands of years have developed systems of knowledge based on a relational ontology that reflects profound connections between humans and nature. We demonstrate that such forms of knowledge have been systematically subjugated by Western scholarship based on arguments inspired by Enlightenment ideals of rationality and empiricism. A decolonial imagination will be able to generate new insights into understanding and addressing the ecological crisis. We therefore call for organization and management scholars to challenge the anthropomorphic biases and the economism that dominates our field through a respectful engagement with Indigenous worldviews.\",\"PeriodicalId\":50648,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory\",\"volume\":\"34 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"26\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/26317877211036714\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/26317877211036714","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 26

摘要

这篇文章旨在改变关于生态危机的话题。我们认为,启蒙思想的产物、对生态危机负有主要责任的人-自然二元论,不能成为任何有意义的解决方案的基础。我们展示了最近西方的想象,如人类世和盖亚,是如何提出克服自然与文化分离的,也是基于排斥,反映了启蒙理性和殖民主义的遗产。与之形成鲜明对比的是,在启蒙运动之前数千年的土著哲学已经发展出了基于关系本体论的知识体系,反映了人与自然之间的深刻联系。我们证明,这种形式的知识已经被西方学术系统地征服了,这些学术基于启蒙运动理性和经验主义理想的启发。一个非殖民化的想象力将能够产生新的见解来理解和解决生态危机。因此,我们呼吁组织和管理学者通过尊重土著世界观,挑战在我们领域占主导地位的拟人化偏见和经济主义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Celebrating the End of Enlightenment: Organization Theory in the Age of the Anthropocene and Gaia (and why neither is the solution to our ecological crisis)
This article aims to change the terms of the conversation about the ecological crisis. We argue that the human–nature dualism, a product of Enlightenment thought and primarily responsible for the ecological crisis, cannot be the basis for any meaningful solutions. We show how more recent Western imaginaries like the Anthropocene and Gaia proposed to overcome the separation of nature from culture are also based on exclusions that reflect Enlightenment rationality and legacies of colonialism. In sharp contrast, we show that Indigenous philosophies that preceded the Enlightenment by thousands of years have developed systems of knowledge based on a relational ontology that reflects profound connections between humans and nature. We demonstrate that such forms of knowledge have been systematically subjugated by Western scholarship based on arguments inspired by Enlightenment ideals of rationality and empiricism. A decolonial imagination will be able to generate new insights into understanding and addressing the ecological crisis. We therefore call for organization and management scholars to challenge the anthropomorphic biases and the economism that dominates our field through a respectful engagement with Indigenous worldviews.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory
Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS-MATHEMATICS, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
16.70%
发文量
14
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory provides an international forum for interdisciplinary research that combines computation, organizations and society. The goal is to advance the state of science in formal reasoning, analysis, and system building drawing on and encouraging advances in areas at the confluence of social networks, artificial intelligence, complexity, machine learning, sociology, business, political science, economics, and operations research. The papers in this journal will lead to the development of newtheories that explain and predict the behaviour of complex adaptive systems, new computational models and technologies that are responsible to society, business, policy, and law, new methods for integrating data, computational models, analysis and visualization techniques. Various types of papers and underlying research are welcome. Papers presenting, validating, or applying models and/or computational techniques, new algorithms, dynamic metrics for networks and complex systems and papers comparing, contrasting and docking computational models are strongly encouraged. Both applied and theoretical work is strongly encouraged. The editors encourage theoretical research on fundamental principles of social behaviour such as coordination, cooperation, evolution, and destabilization. The editors encourage applied research representing actual organizational or policy problems that can be addressed using computational tools. Work related to fundamental concepts, corporate, military or intelligence issues are welcome.
期刊最新文献
The “chanification” of white supremacist extremism Investigating the use of belief-bias to measure acceptance of false information Modeling and analyzing network dynamics of COVID-19 vaccine information propagation in the Chinese Sina Microblog Misogynistic targeting of women in power predicts broader online harassment patterns The dynamic effects of transformational leadership on employee retention and employability over time: an agent-based model
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1