电厂部件疲劳评估先进计算概念的最新进展

T. Schopf, S. Weihe, J. Rudolph
{"title":"电厂部件疲劳评估先进计算概念的最新进展","authors":"T. Schopf, S. Weihe, J. Rudolph","doi":"10.1115/pvp2022-85543","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The Fatigue lifetime assessment of pressurized components e.g. in nuclear power plants (NPPs) is an essential part of the aging management (AM) ensuring safe and reliable long term operation (LTO). The practically applied calculation procedures of different international codes and standards are widely affected by the basic principles formulated in the criteria document [1]. Those criteria are still fundamental for the fatigue assessment of pressure vessel and power plant components and there is good reason to target at improvements in the consideration of the major factors of influence on the fatigue lifetime while keeping the well-proven methodological framework. This paves the way to related future design code amendment proposals. In practice, there are often large discrepancies between calculated fatigue life and practical experience from power plant operation, where the operating experience reveals much higher fatigue lifetimes as their predictions based on laboratory tests and conservative consideration of major influencing factors (plastification by Ke-factors, Environmentally Assisted Fatigue (EAF) by FEN-factors) in the calculation approach. In the framework of a cooperative research program (see e.g. [2], [3] and [4]) including various subprojects Framatome GmbH, Erlangen, and the Materials Testing Institute MPA Stuttgart have been developing improvements to the fatigue lifetime assessment methods in the framework of the well established engineering approach [1]. These improvements are consolidated by the results of experiments on specimens of ferritic and austenitic stainless steels and austenitic stainless steel welds as well as component tests are performed under laboratory and operating conditions to improve fatigue assessment. The following aspects are going to be pointed out\n - Consideration of hold time and environmental (EAF) effects including the threshold and fatigue limit behavior\n - Relevance of multiaxial non-proportionality effects for typical power plant operational loading histories\n - Consideration of the cyclic elastic-plastic deformation behavior\n - Integration of the fatigue damage parameter approach into the calculation concept (particularly modified fatigue damage parameter of Haibach and Lehrke PHL,mod and fatigue damage parameter PJ)\n - Low-Cycle (LCF), High-Cycle (HCF) and Very High-Cycle (VHCF) fatigue behavior, interaction and related damage accumulation effects including the transient fatigue limit.\n The paper gives an overview of the state of the calculation concept.","PeriodicalId":23700,"journal":{"name":"Volume 2: Computer Technology and Bolted Joints; Design and Analysis","volume":"41 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Recent Developments of Advanced Calculation Concepts for the Fatigue Assessment of Power Plant Components\",\"authors\":\"T. Schopf, S. Weihe, J. Rudolph\",\"doi\":\"10.1115/pvp2022-85543\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n The Fatigue lifetime assessment of pressurized components e.g. in nuclear power plants (NPPs) is an essential part of the aging management (AM) ensuring safe and reliable long term operation (LTO). The practically applied calculation procedures of different international codes and standards are widely affected by the basic principles formulated in the criteria document [1]. Those criteria are still fundamental for the fatigue assessment of pressure vessel and power plant components and there is good reason to target at improvements in the consideration of the major factors of influence on the fatigue lifetime while keeping the well-proven methodological framework. This paves the way to related future design code amendment proposals. In practice, there are often large discrepancies between calculated fatigue life and practical experience from power plant operation, where the operating experience reveals much higher fatigue lifetimes as their predictions based on laboratory tests and conservative consideration of major influencing factors (plastification by Ke-factors, Environmentally Assisted Fatigue (EAF) by FEN-factors) in the calculation approach. In the framework of a cooperative research program (see e.g. [2], [3] and [4]) including various subprojects Framatome GmbH, Erlangen, and the Materials Testing Institute MPA Stuttgart have been developing improvements to the fatigue lifetime assessment methods in the framework of the well established engineering approach [1]. These improvements are consolidated by the results of experiments on specimens of ferritic and austenitic stainless steels and austenitic stainless steel welds as well as component tests are performed under laboratory and operating conditions to improve fatigue assessment. The following aspects are going to be pointed out\\n - Consideration of hold time and environmental (EAF) effects including the threshold and fatigue limit behavior\\n - Relevance of multiaxial non-proportionality effects for typical power plant operational loading histories\\n - Consideration of the cyclic elastic-plastic deformation behavior\\n - Integration of the fatigue damage parameter approach into the calculation concept (particularly modified fatigue damage parameter of Haibach and Lehrke PHL,mod and fatigue damage parameter PJ)\\n - Low-Cycle (LCF), High-Cycle (HCF) and Very High-Cycle (VHCF) fatigue behavior, interaction and related damage accumulation effects including the transient fatigue limit.\\n The paper gives an overview of the state of the calculation concept.\",\"PeriodicalId\":23700,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Volume 2: Computer Technology and Bolted Joints; Design and Analysis\",\"volume\":\"41 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Volume 2: Computer Technology and Bolted Joints; Design and Analysis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1115/pvp2022-85543\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Volume 2: Computer Technology and Bolted Joints; Design and Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/pvp2022-85543","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

核电站等受压部件的疲劳寿命评估是确保长期安全可靠运行的老化管理的重要组成部分。在实际应用中,各种国际规范和标准的计算程序都受到准则文件[1]所制定的基本原则的广泛影响。这些标准仍然是压力容器和发电厂部件疲劳评估的基础,有充分的理由在保持行之有效的方法框架的同时,在考虑影响疲劳寿命的主要因素方面进行改进。这为今后相关的设计规范修订建议铺平了道路。在实践中,计算的疲劳寿命与电厂运行的实际经验往往存在很大的差异,在电厂运行经验中,基于实验室试验和保守考虑主要影响因素(ke因素的塑化,fen因素的环境辅助疲劳)的计算方法显示出更高的疲劳寿命。在一个合作研究项目的框架内(参见[2],[3]和[4]),包括各个子项目,Framatome GmbH, Erlangen和材料测试研究所MPA斯图加特已经在完善的工程方法框架内开发了疲劳寿命评估方法的改进[1]。对铁素体和奥氏体不锈钢和奥氏体不锈钢焊接试样的实验结果以及在实验室和操作条件下进行的部件测试结果证实了这些改进,以改进疲劳评估。将指出以下几个方面-考虑保持时间和环境(EAF)影响,包括阈值和疲劳极限行为-多轴非比例效应对典型电厂运行加载历史的相关性-考虑循环弹塑性变形行为-将疲劳损伤参数方法集成到计算概念中(特别是Haibach和Lehrke PHL,mod的修正疲劳损伤参数)低周(LCF)、高周(HCF)和甚高周(VHCF)疲劳行为、相互作用和包括瞬态疲劳极限在内的相关损伤累积效应。本文对计算概念的现状进行了概述。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Recent Developments of Advanced Calculation Concepts for the Fatigue Assessment of Power Plant Components
The Fatigue lifetime assessment of pressurized components e.g. in nuclear power plants (NPPs) is an essential part of the aging management (AM) ensuring safe and reliable long term operation (LTO). The practically applied calculation procedures of different international codes and standards are widely affected by the basic principles formulated in the criteria document [1]. Those criteria are still fundamental for the fatigue assessment of pressure vessel and power plant components and there is good reason to target at improvements in the consideration of the major factors of influence on the fatigue lifetime while keeping the well-proven methodological framework. This paves the way to related future design code amendment proposals. In practice, there are often large discrepancies between calculated fatigue life and practical experience from power plant operation, where the operating experience reveals much higher fatigue lifetimes as their predictions based on laboratory tests and conservative consideration of major influencing factors (plastification by Ke-factors, Environmentally Assisted Fatigue (EAF) by FEN-factors) in the calculation approach. In the framework of a cooperative research program (see e.g. [2], [3] and [4]) including various subprojects Framatome GmbH, Erlangen, and the Materials Testing Institute MPA Stuttgart have been developing improvements to the fatigue lifetime assessment methods in the framework of the well established engineering approach [1]. These improvements are consolidated by the results of experiments on specimens of ferritic and austenitic stainless steels and austenitic stainless steel welds as well as component tests are performed under laboratory and operating conditions to improve fatigue assessment. The following aspects are going to be pointed out - Consideration of hold time and environmental (EAF) effects including the threshold and fatigue limit behavior - Relevance of multiaxial non-proportionality effects for typical power plant operational loading histories - Consideration of the cyclic elastic-plastic deformation behavior - Integration of the fatigue damage parameter approach into the calculation concept (particularly modified fatigue damage parameter of Haibach and Lehrke PHL,mod and fatigue damage parameter PJ) - Low-Cycle (LCF), High-Cycle (HCF) and Very High-Cycle (VHCF) fatigue behavior, interaction and related damage accumulation effects including the transient fatigue limit. The paper gives an overview of the state of the calculation concept.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
High-Temperature Design of 700°C Heat Exchanger in a Large Scale High-Temperature Thermal Energy Storage Performance Test Facility On the Effect of Hot-Box Size on Coke Drum Skirt Fatigue Life Numerical Approaches for Bolt Interactions in Flange Gasket Assemblies Experimental Investigation on the Fatigue Strength for Different Tightening Procedures and Materials in Metric Screws Study on Post-Buckling Behaviors of Lower Heads for Fracture Control of Reactor Vessels Under BDBE
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1