物质性、种族和思辨美学

IF 1 Q3 GEOGRAPHY Geohumanities Pub Date : 2021-12-01 DOI:10.1080/2373566X.2021.1977163
Julian Brigstocke, Gunter Gassner
{"title":"物质性、种族和思辨美学","authors":"Julian Brigstocke, Gunter Gassner","doi":"10.1080/2373566X.2021.1977163","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The papers in this forum on Spaces and Politics of Aesthetics share a concern with analyzing relationships between politics and aesthetics in ways that question humanist, anthropocentric logics underpinning dominant aesthetic regimes of power. They do so by foregrounding more-than-human materialities and critical analyses of race and colonial power. In this introduction, we begin by routing debates around spaces and politics of aesthetics through post-humanist, new-materialist, and post-colonial trajectories. We also highlight theoretical reference points that animate many of the contributions to the forum, focusing on the aesthetics of disruption in Glissant, Rancière, and Benjamin. We then move on to guide the reader along two different routes through the collection, focusing first on material aesthetics, and then on aesthetic regimes of race.","PeriodicalId":53217,"journal":{"name":"Geohumanities","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Materiality, Race, and Speculative Aesthetics\",\"authors\":\"Julian Brigstocke, Gunter Gassner\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/2373566X.2021.1977163\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The papers in this forum on Spaces and Politics of Aesthetics share a concern with analyzing relationships between politics and aesthetics in ways that question humanist, anthropocentric logics underpinning dominant aesthetic regimes of power. They do so by foregrounding more-than-human materialities and critical analyses of race and colonial power. In this introduction, we begin by routing debates around spaces and politics of aesthetics through post-humanist, new-materialist, and post-colonial trajectories. We also highlight theoretical reference points that animate many of the contributions to the forum, focusing on the aesthetics of disruption in Glissant, Rancière, and Benjamin. We then move on to guide the reader along two different routes through the collection, focusing first on material aesthetics, and then on aesthetic regimes of race.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53217,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Geohumanities\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Geohumanities\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/2373566X.2021.1977163\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOGRAPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geohumanities","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/2373566X.2021.1977163","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本次论坛关于空间和美学政治的论文都关注分析政治与美学之间的关系,质疑支撑主导美学权力制度的人本主义、人类中心主义逻辑。他们通过突出超越人类的材料和对种族和殖民权力的批判性分析来做到这一点。在本导论中,我们首先通过后人文主义、新唯物主义和后殖民主义的轨迹,围绕美学的空间和政治展开辩论。我们还强调了激发论坛许多贡献的理论参考点,重点关注Glissant, ranci和本杰明的破坏美学。然后,我们继续引导读者沿着两条不同的路线阅读这部文集,首先关注材料美学,然后关注种族的美学制度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Materiality, Race, and Speculative Aesthetics
The papers in this forum on Spaces and Politics of Aesthetics share a concern with analyzing relationships between politics and aesthetics in ways that question humanist, anthropocentric logics underpinning dominant aesthetic regimes of power. They do so by foregrounding more-than-human materialities and critical analyses of race and colonial power. In this introduction, we begin by routing debates around spaces and politics of aesthetics through post-humanist, new-materialist, and post-colonial trajectories. We also highlight theoretical reference points that animate many of the contributions to the forum, focusing on the aesthetics of disruption in Glissant, Rancière, and Benjamin. We then move on to guide the reader along two different routes through the collection, focusing first on material aesthetics, and then on aesthetic regimes of race.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Geohumanities
Geohumanities GEOGRAPHY-
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
14.30%
发文量
22
期刊最新文献
The Redemption of Berlin’s Memory Landscapes: Yael Bartana’s Malka Germania Map Cards: Creative Mapping for Place Dialogue Within or Outside the Boundaries: Exploring the Intricacies of Human-Elephant Relationship in Tania James’s Novel The Tusk That Did the Damage “Deep Weathered Jam”: Creative Conversations with Geologic Mobilities and Farming Landscapes Intimate Outer Space: Towards a Politics of Gravity, Waste, and the Spatial Orientation of Bodies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1