人工角膜植入眼自体屈光与主观屈光的一致性

Waleed S. Al-Tuwairqi, K. Ogbuehi, Haya Razzouk, Mana A Alanazi, U. Osuagwu
{"title":"人工角膜植入眼自体屈光与主观屈光的一致性","authors":"Waleed S. Al-Tuwairqi, K. Ogbuehi, Haya Razzouk, Mana A Alanazi, U. Osuagwu","doi":"10.1097/ICL.0000000000000244","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: To assess the agreement between subjective refraction and autorefraction and to explore the relationship between the magnitude of higher order aberration, and visual acuity and refraction, before and after keraring implantation. Methods: This prospective, randomized, interventional study enrolled 27 subjects (mean age 28.1±6.5 years) with keratoconus. Noncycloplegic refraction was performed subjectively by one clinician and with an autorefractor by another clinician, before and 6 months after surgery. The limit of agreement (LoA) between methods was assessed, and the relationships between the corrected distance visual acuity, logMAR on the one hand and refraction measurements and higher-order aberrations on the other, were examined. Results: The agreement in mean spherical equivalent refraction (MSER) between methods was good postoperatively but poor preoperatively. The autorefractor gave a more myopic refraction than subjective refraction preoperatively (−3.28±3.06 D; LoA −9.27 to +2.71 D, P<0.0001) and postoperatively (−0.63±1.64 D; LoA −3.85 to +2.58 D, P=0.055), and returned higher negative cylinders preoperatively (−1.10±1.17 D; LoA −3.40 to +1.19 D, P<0.0001) and postoperatively (−1.08±1.27 D; LoA −3.60 to +1.41 D, P<0.0001) in keratoconic eyes. The difference in MSER between methods was significantly related to the refractive error at both visits (P<0.05) and to the magnitude of higher-order aberrations in keratoconic eyes preoperatively (P<0.05). The logMAR visual acuity achieved subjectively worsened as the magnitude of higher-order aberrations increased preoperatively (P<0.001). Conclusions: The autorefractor returns values that are significantly more myopic in MSER and higher negative cylinders than subjective refraction, preoperatively, but the MSER was similar between devices postoperatively. The autorefactor seems a valid starting point for subjective refraction in keratoconic eyes treated with keraring, but the cylinder should be corrected by about +1 D. The instruments agree more in less myopic than high myopic eyes.","PeriodicalId":12216,"journal":{"name":"Eye & Contact Lens: Science & Clinical Practice","volume":"96 1","pages":"116–122"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Agreement Between Autorefraction and Subjective Refraction in Keraring-Implanted Keratoconic Eyes\",\"authors\":\"Waleed S. Al-Tuwairqi, K. Ogbuehi, Haya Razzouk, Mana A Alanazi, U. Osuagwu\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/ICL.0000000000000244\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objectives: To assess the agreement between subjective refraction and autorefraction and to explore the relationship between the magnitude of higher order aberration, and visual acuity and refraction, before and after keraring implantation. Methods: This prospective, randomized, interventional study enrolled 27 subjects (mean age 28.1±6.5 years) with keratoconus. Noncycloplegic refraction was performed subjectively by one clinician and with an autorefractor by another clinician, before and 6 months after surgery. The limit of agreement (LoA) between methods was assessed, and the relationships between the corrected distance visual acuity, logMAR on the one hand and refraction measurements and higher-order aberrations on the other, were examined. Results: The agreement in mean spherical equivalent refraction (MSER) between methods was good postoperatively but poor preoperatively. The autorefractor gave a more myopic refraction than subjective refraction preoperatively (−3.28±3.06 D; LoA −9.27 to +2.71 D, P<0.0001) and postoperatively (−0.63±1.64 D; LoA −3.85 to +2.58 D, P=0.055), and returned higher negative cylinders preoperatively (−1.10±1.17 D; LoA −3.40 to +1.19 D, P<0.0001) and postoperatively (−1.08±1.27 D; LoA −3.60 to +1.41 D, P<0.0001) in keratoconic eyes. The difference in MSER between methods was significantly related to the refractive error at both visits (P<0.05) and to the magnitude of higher-order aberrations in keratoconic eyes preoperatively (P<0.05). The logMAR visual acuity achieved subjectively worsened as the magnitude of higher-order aberrations increased preoperatively (P<0.001). Conclusions: The autorefractor returns values that are significantly more myopic in MSER and higher negative cylinders than subjective refraction, preoperatively, but the MSER was similar between devices postoperatively. The autorefactor seems a valid starting point for subjective refraction in keratoconic eyes treated with keraring, but the cylinder should be corrected by about +1 D. The instruments agree more in less myopic than high myopic eyes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":12216,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Eye & Contact Lens: Science & Clinical Practice\",\"volume\":\"96 1\",\"pages\":\"116–122\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Eye & Contact Lens: Science & Clinical Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/ICL.0000000000000244\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Eye & Contact Lens: Science & Clinical Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ICL.0000000000000244","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

目的:评价角膜植入术前后主观屈光度与自体屈光度的一致性,探讨角膜植入术前后高阶像差大小与视力和屈光度的关系。方法:该前瞻性、随机、干预性研究纳入27例圆锥角膜患者(平均年龄28.1±6.5岁)。术前和术后6个月,由一名临床医生主观上进行非睫状体麻痹性屈光检查,另一名临床医生自行进行屈光检查。评估了两种方法之间的一致性极限(LoA),并检查了校正距离视力(logMAR)与折射测量和高阶像差之间的关系。结果:两种方法的平均球面等效屈光度(MSER)术后一致性较好,术前一致性较差。自体屈光镜的近视眼屈光优于术前的主观屈光(−3.28±3.06 D;术后LoA (- 9.27 ~ +2.71 D, P<0.0001)和术后LoA(- 0.63±1.64 D;LoA为−3.85 ~ +2.58 D, P=0.055),术前返回较高负柱体(−1.10±1.17 D;术后LoA (- 3.40 ~ +1.19 D, P<0.0001)和术后LoA(- 1.08±1.27 D;角膜锥形眼的LoA为−3.60 ~ +1.41 D, P<0.0001)。两种方法的MSER差异与两次屈光不正(P<0.05)和角膜塑形眼术前高阶像差大小有显著相关(P<0.05)。随着术前高阶像差的增加,主观上获得的logMAR视力变差(P<0.001)。结论:自体屈光镜在术前的MSER和负柱面值均明显高于主观屈光镜,但术后两种设备的MSER相似。自重构器似乎是角膜屈光治疗的主观屈光的有效起点,但圆柱体应矫正约+1 d,仪器在轻度近视中比高度近视更符合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Agreement Between Autorefraction and Subjective Refraction in Keraring-Implanted Keratoconic Eyes
Objectives: To assess the agreement between subjective refraction and autorefraction and to explore the relationship between the magnitude of higher order aberration, and visual acuity and refraction, before and after keraring implantation. Methods: This prospective, randomized, interventional study enrolled 27 subjects (mean age 28.1±6.5 years) with keratoconus. Noncycloplegic refraction was performed subjectively by one clinician and with an autorefractor by another clinician, before and 6 months after surgery. The limit of agreement (LoA) between methods was assessed, and the relationships between the corrected distance visual acuity, logMAR on the one hand and refraction measurements and higher-order aberrations on the other, were examined. Results: The agreement in mean spherical equivalent refraction (MSER) between methods was good postoperatively but poor preoperatively. The autorefractor gave a more myopic refraction than subjective refraction preoperatively (−3.28±3.06 D; LoA −9.27 to +2.71 D, P<0.0001) and postoperatively (−0.63±1.64 D; LoA −3.85 to +2.58 D, P=0.055), and returned higher negative cylinders preoperatively (−1.10±1.17 D; LoA −3.40 to +1.19 D, P<0.0001) and postoperatively (−1.08±1.27 D; LoA −3.60 to +1.41 D, P<0.0001) in keratoconic eyes. The difference in MSER between methods was significantly related to the refractive error at both visits (P<0.05) and to the magnitude of higher-order aberrations in keratoconic eyes preoperatively (P<0.05). The logMAR visual acuity achieved subjectively worsened as the magnitude of higher-order aberrations increased preoperatively (P<0.001). Conclusions: The autorefractor returns values that are significantly more myopic in MSER and higher negative cylinders than subjective refraction, preoperatively, but the MSER was similar between devices postoperatively. The autorefactor seems a valid starting point for subjective refraction in keratoconic eyes treated with keraring, but the cylinder should be corrected by about +1 D. The instruments agree more in less myopic than high myopic eyes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Clinical Profile and Treatment Outcomes of Patients With Acremonium Species Positive Keratitis Managed in a Tertiary Eye Care Center Efficacy of the Image-Guided Alignment System for a Four-Haptic Hydrophobic Monofocal Toric Intraocular Lens Evaluation of Ocular Surface Characteristics in Dry Eye Disease With and Without Soft Contact Lens Wear: A Comparative Study Change in Risk Score and Behaviors of Soft Contact Lens Wearers After Targeted Patient Education Corneal Response to Scleral Contact Lens Wear in Keratoconus
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1