Pentacam和VX120测量角膜厚度和前房深度的一致性

Qing-wei Zhang, C. Zhai, Dong-li Ma, Jing Zhang
{"title":"Pentacam和VX120测量角膜厚度和前房深度的一致性","authors":"Qing-wei Zhang, C. Zhai, Dong-li Ma, Jing Zhang","doi":"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1674-845X.2019.07.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: \nTo compare the consistency of central corneal thickness (CCT), minimum corneal thickness (MinCT) and anterior chamber depth (ACD) measured by Pentacam and VX120. \n \n \nMethods: \nIn this case series study, 71 myopia patients with (142 eyes) who planned to receive refractive surgery were enrolled from the March 2018 to April 2018, in Beijing Tongren Hospital. All subjects were under CCT, MinCT, ACD measurement by Pentacam and VX120. Due to that data of both eyes were used, thus a Rosner-Glynn-Lee method was used to make correction. The clustered rank sign test was used to compare the measurements of different equipment. The intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) and Bland-Altman 95% limits of agreement were used to measure the consistency of measurement of different equipment. \n \n \nResults: \nCCT, ACD measured by the VX120 was lower than Pentacam (Z=3.524, 7.446, all P<0.001). There was no statistical difference in the measurement of MinCT between VX120 and Pentacam (Z=0.679, P=0.497). The ICC of MinCT measured by VX120 and Pentacam was 0.9 and the Bland-Altman plot showed that 93.7% of the data were distributed within the confidence interval. The 95% limits of agreement of MinCT were -27.81 to 29.26 μm for these two devices. \n \n \nConclusions: \nVX120 has a high consistency with Pentacam on the measurement of MinCT. However, the measurements acquired by VX120 should not be directly interchangeable with Pentacam measurements in clinical practice. \n \n \nKey words: \nVX120; Pentacam; consistency; corneal thickness; minimum corneal thickness; anterior chamber depth","PeriodicalId":10142,"journal":{"name":"Chinese Journal of Optometry & Ophthalmology","volume":"148 1","pages":"488-492"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Consistency of Corneal Thickness and Anterior Chamber Depth Measured by Pentacam and VX120\",\"authors\":\"Qing-wei Zhang, C. Zhai, Dong-li Ma, Jing Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1674-845X.2019.07.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: \\nTo compare the consistency of central corneal thickness (CCT), minimum corneal thickness (MinCT) and anterior chamber depth (ACD) measured by Pentacam and VX120. \\n \\n \\nMethods: \\nIn this case series study, 71 myopia patients with (142 eyes) who planned to receive refractive surgery were enrolled from the March 2018 to April 2018, in Beijing Tongren Hospital. All subjects were under CCT, MinCT, ACD measurement by Pentacam and VX120. Due to that data of both eyes were used, thus a Rosner-Glynn-Lee method was used to make correction. The clustered rank sign test was used to compare the measurements of different equipment. The intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) and Bland-Altman 95% limits of agreement were used to measure the consistency of measurement of different equipment. \\n \\n \\nResults: \\nCCT, ACD measured by the VX120 was lower than Pentacam (Z=3.524, 7.446, all P<0.001). There was no statistical difference in the measurement of MinCT between VX120 and Pentacam (Z=0.679, P=0.497). The ICC of MinCT measured by VX120 and Pentacam was 0.9 and the Bland-Altman plot showed that 93.7% of the data were distributed within the confidence interval. The 95% limits of agreement of MinCT were -27.81 to 29.26 μm for these two devices. \\n \\n \\nConclusions: \\nVX120 has a high consistency with Pentacam on the measurement of MinCT. However, the measurements acquired by VX120 should not be directly interchangeable with Pentacam measurements in clinical practice. \\n \\n \\nKey words: \\nVX120; Pentacam; consistency; corneal thickness; minimum corneal thickness; anterior chamber depth\",\"PeriodicalId\":10142,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Chinese Journal of Optometry & Ophthalmology\",\"volume\":\"148 1\",\"pages\":\"488-492\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-07-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Chinese Journal of Optometry & Ophthalmology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1674-845X.2019.07.002\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chinese Journal of Optometry & Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1674-845X.2019.07.002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:比较Pentacam与VX120测量角膜中央厚度(CCT)、角膜最小厚度(MinCT)和前房深度(ACD)的一致性。方法:选取2018年3月至2018年4月北京同仁医院拟行屈光手术的近视患者71例(142只眼)进行病例系列研究。所有受试者均采用Pentacam和VX120测量CCT、MinCT和ACD。由于使用了双眼数据,因此采用Rosner-Glynn-Lee法进行矫正。聚类秩号检验用于比较不同设备的测量值。采用类内相关系数(ICC)和Bland-Altman 95%一致限来衡量不同设备测量的一致性。结果:VX120测量CCT、ACD均低于Pentacam (Z=3.524、7.446,P均<0.001)。VX120与Pentacam的MinCT测量差异无统计学意义(Z=0.679, P=0.497)。VX120和Pentacam测量MinCT的ICC为0.9,Bland-Altman图显示93.7%的数据分布在置信区间内。这两种器件的MinCT一致性95%限为-27.81 ~ 29.26 μm。结论:VX120与Pentacam测量MinCT具有较高的一致性。然而,在临床实践中,VX120获得的测量结果不应与Pentacam测量结果直接互换。关键词:VX120;Pentacam;一致性;角膜厚度;最小角膜厚度;前房深度
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Consistency of Corneal Thickness and Anterior Chamber Depth Measured by Pentacam and VX120
Objective: To compare the consistency of central corneal thickness (CCT), minimum corneal thickness (MinCT) and anterior chamber depth (ACD) measured by Pentacam and VX120. Methods: In this case series study, 71 myopia patients with (142 eyes) who planned to receive refractive surgery were enrolled from the March 2018 to April 2018, in Beijing Tongren Hospital. All subjects were under CCT, MinCT, ACD measurement by Pentacam and VX120. Due to that data of both eyes were used, thus a Rosner-Glynn-Lee method was used to make correction. The clustered rank sign test was used to compare the measurements of different equipment. The intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) and Bland-Altman 95% limits of agreement were used to measure the consistency of measurement of different equipment. Results: CCT, ACD measured by the VX120 was lower than Pentacam (Z=3.524, 7.446, all P<0.001). There was no statistical difference in the measurement of MinCT between VX120 and Pentacam (Z=0.679, P=0.497). The ICC of MinCT measured by VX120 and Pentacam was 0.9 and the Bland-Altman plot showed that 93.7% of the data were distributed within the confidence interval. The 95% limits of agreement of MinCT were -27.81 to 29.26 μm for these two devices. Conclusions: VX120 has a high consistency with Pentacam on the measurement of MinCT. However, the measurements acquired by VX120 should not be directly interchangeable with Pentacam measurements in clinical practice. Key words: VX120; Pentacam; consistency; corneal thickness; minimum corneal thickness; anterior chamber depth
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Practice and Effectiveness of COVID-19 RNA Detection in the Prevention and Control of Ophthalmic Hospital Correct Choice of Goggles and Anti-fog Guidance Duringthe Epidemic Period of COVID-19 2019-nCoV and Eye, What We Know and What We Should Do Clinical Application Value of a Preset Marking Line in Lacrimal Endoscopic Surgery Characteristics of Macular Microvascular Changes in Patients with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1