隐私保护分布式网络故障排除-弥合理论与实践之间的差距

M. Burkhart, X. Dimitropoulos
{"title":"隐私保护分布式网络故障排除-弥合理论与实践之间的差距","authors":"M. Burkhart, X. Dimitropoulos","doi":"10.1145/2043628.2043632","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Today, there is a fundamental imbalance in cybersecurity. While attackers act more and more globally and coordinated, network defense is limited to examine local information only due to privacy concerns. To overcome this privacy barrier, we use secure multiparty computation (MPC) for the problem of aggregating network data from multiple domains. We first optimize MPC comparison operations for processing high volume data in near real-time by not enforcing protocols to run in a constant number of synchronization rounds. We then implement a complete set of basic MPC primitives in the SEPIA library. For parallel invocations, SEPIA's basic operations are between 35 and several hundred times faster than those of comparable MPC frameworks. Using these operations, we develop four protocols tailored for distributed network monitoring and security applications: the entropy, distinct count, event correlation, and top-k protocols. Extensive evaluation shows that the protocols are suitable for near real-time data aggregation. For example, our top-k protocol PPTKS accurately aggregates counts for 180,000 distributed IP addresses in only a few minutes. Finally, we use SEPIA with real traffic data from 17 customers of a backbone network to collaboratively detect, analyze, and mitigate distributed anomalies. Our work follows a path starting from theory, going to system design, performance evaluation, and ending with measurement. Along this way, it makes a first effort to bridge two very disparate worlds: MPC theory and network monitoring and security practices.","PeriodicalId":50912,"journal":{"name":"ACM Transactions on Information and System Security","volume":"129 1","pages":"31:1-31:30"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"16","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Privacy-preserving distributed network troubleshooting—bridging the gap between theory and practice\",\"authors\":\"M. Burkhart, X. Dimitropoulos\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/2043628.2043632\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Today, there is a fundamental imbalance in cybersecurity. While attackers act more and more globally and coordinated, network defense is limited to examine local information only due to privacy concerns. To overcome this privacy barrier, we use secure multiparty computation (MPC) for the problem of aggregating network data from multiple domains. We first optimize MPC comparison operations for processing high volume data in near real-time by not enforcing protocols to run in a constant number of synchronization rounds. We then implement a complete set of basic MPC primitives in the SEPIA library. For parallel invocations, SEPIA's basic operations are between 35 and several hundred times faster than those of comparable MPC frameworks. Using these operations, we develop four protocols tailored for distributed network monitoring and security applications: the entropy, distinct count, event correlation, and top-k protocols. Extensive evaluation shows that the protocols are suitable for near real-time data aggregation. For example, our top-k protocol PPTKS accurately aggregates counts for 180,000 distributed IP addresses in only a few minutes. Finally, we use SEPIA with real traffic data from 17 customers of a backbone network to collaboratively detect, analyze, and mitigate distributed anomalies. Our work follows a path starting from theory, going to system design, performance evaluation, and ending with measurement. Along this way, it makes a first effort to bridge two very disparate worlds: MPC theory and network monitoring and security practices.\",\"PeriodicalId\":50912,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACM Transactions on Information and System Security\",\"volume\":\"129 1\",\"pages\":\"31:1-31:30\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"16\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACM Transactions on Information and System Security\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/2043628.2043632\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q\",\"JCRName\":\"Engineering\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACM Transactions on Information and System Security","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2043628.2043632","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16

摘要

今天,网络安全存在根本性的不平衡。当攻击者的行动越来越全球化和协调时,由于隐私问题,网络防御仅限于检查本地信息。为了克服这一隐私障碍,我们使用安全多方计算(MPC)来解决来自多个域的网络数据聚合问题。我们首先优化了MPC比较操作,以便在接近实时的情况下处理大容量数据,而不是强制协议在固定数量的同步轮中运行。然后,我们在SEPIA库中实现了一套完整的基本MPC原语。对于并行调用,SEPIA的基本操作要比类似的MPC框架快35到几百倍。使用这些操作,我们开发了为分布式网络监控和安全应用量身定制的四种协议:熵、不同计数、事件关联和top-k协议。广泛的评估表明,该协议适用于近实时数据聚合。例如,我们的top-k协议PPTKS在几分钟内准确地聚合了18万个分布式IP地址的计数。最后,我们使用SEPIA与来自骨干网络的17个客户的真实流量数据来协同检测,分析和缓解分布式异常。我们的工作遵循从理论开始,到系统设计,性能评估,最后以测量结束的路径。在这个过程中,它首次尝试连接两个完全不同的世界:MPC理论和网络监控与安全实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Privacy-preserving distributed network troubleshooting—bridging the gap between theory and practice
Today, there is a fundamental imbalance in cybersecurity. While attackers act more and more globally and coordinated, network defense is limited to examine local information only due to privacy concerns. To overcome this privacy barrier, we use secure multiparty computation (MPC) for the problem of aggregating network data from multiple domains. We first optimize MPC comparison operations for processing high volume data in near real-time by not enforcing protocols to run in a constant number of synchronization rounds. We then implement a complete set of basic MPC primitives in the SEPIA library. For parallel invocations, SEPIA's basic operations are between 35 and several hundred times faster than those of comparable MPC frameworks. Using these operations, we develop four protocols tailored for distributed network monitoring and security applications: the entropy, distinct count, event correlation, and top-k protocols. Extensive evaluation shows that the protocols are suitable for near real-time data aggregation. For example, our top-k protocol PPTKS accurately aggregates counts for 180,000 distributed IP addresses in only a few minutes. Finally, we use SEPIA with real traffic data from 17 customers of a backbone network to collaboratively detect, analyze, and mitigate distributed anomalies. Our work follows a path starting from theory, going to system design, performance evaluation, and ending with measurement. Along this way, it makes a first effort to bridge two very disparate worlds: MPC theory and network monitoring and security practices.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
ACM Transactions on Information and System Security
ACM Transactions on Information and System Security 工程技术-计算机:信息系统
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
3.3 months
期刊介绍: ISSEC is a scholarly, scientific journal that publishes original research papers in all areas of information and system security, including technologies, systems, applications, and policies.
期刊最新文献
An Efficient User Verification System Using Angle-Based Mouse Movement Biometrics A New Framework for Privacy-Preserving Aggregation of Time-Series Data Behavioral Study of Users When Interacting with Active Honeytokens Model Checking Distributed Mandatory Access Control Policies Randomization-Based Intrusion Detection System for Advanced Metering Infrastructure*
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1