用示踪热年代学定量流域侵蚀需要多少粒?

IF 2.7 Q2 GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS Geochronology Pub Date : 2022-03-31 DOI:10.5194/gchron-4-177-2022
A. Madella, C. Glotzbach, T. Ehlers
{"title":"用示踪热年代学定量流域侵蚀需要多少粒?","authors":"A. Madella, C. Glotzbach, T. Ehlers","doi":"10.5194/gchron-4-177-2022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract. Detrital tracer thermochronology utilizes the relationship between bedrock thermochronometric age–elevation profiles and a distribution of detrital grain ages collected from riverine, glacial, or other sediment to study spatial variations in the distribution of catchment erosion. If bedrock ages increase linearly with elevation, spatially uniform erosion is expected to yield a detrital age distribution that mimics the shape of a catchment's hypsometric curve. Alternatively, a mismatch between\ndetrital and hypsometric distributions may indicate spatial variability of\nsediment production within the source area. For studies seeking to identify\nthe pattern of sediment production, detrital samples rarely exceed 100\ngrains due to the time and costs related to individual measurements. With\nsample sizes of this order, detecting the dissimilarity between two detrital\nage distributions produced by different catchment erosion scenarios can be\ndifficult at a high statistical confidence level. However, there are no\nestablished software tools to quantify the uncertainty inherent to detrital\ntracer thermochronology as a function of sample size and spatial pattern of\nsediment production. As a result, practitioners are often left wondering\n“how many grains is enough to detect a certain signal?”. Here, we\ninvestigate how sample size affects the uncertainty of detrital age\ndistributions and how such uncertainty affects the ability to infer a\npattern of sediment production of the upstream area. We do this using the\nKolmogorov–Smirnov statistic as a metric of dissimilarity among\ndistributions. From this, we perform statistical hypothesis testing by means of Monte Carlo sampling. These techniques are implemented in a new tool (ESD_thermotrace) to (i) consistently report the confidence level allowed by the sample size as a function of application-specific variables and given a set of user-defined hypothetical erosion scenarios, (ii) analyze the statistical power to discern each scenario from the uniform erosion hypothesis, and (iii) identify the erosion scenario that is least dissimilar to the observed detrital sample (if available). ESD_thermotrace is made available as a new open-source Python-based script alongside the test data. Testing between different hypothesized erosion scenarios with this tool provides thermochronologists with the minimum sample size (i.e., number of bedrock and detrital grain ages) required to answer their specific scientific question at their desired level of statistical confidence.\n","PeriodicalId":12723,"journal":{"name":"Geochronology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How many grains are needed for quantifying catchment erosion from tracer thermochronology?\",\"authors\":\"A. Madella, C. Glotzbach, T. Ehlers\",\"doi\":\"10.5194/gchron-4-177-2022\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract. Detrital tracer thermochronology utilizes the relationship between bedrock thermochronometric age–elevation profiles and a distribution of detrital grain ages collected from riverine, glacial, or other sediment to study spatial variations in the distribution of catchment erosion. If bedrock ages increase linearly with elevation, spatially uniform erosion is expected to yield a detrital age distribution that mimics the shape of a catchment's hypsometric curve. Alternatively, a mismatch between\\ndetrital and hypsometric distributions may indicate spatial variability of\\nsediment production within the source area. For studies seeking to identify\\nthe pattern of sediment production, detrital samples rarely exceed 100\\ngrains due to the time and costs related to individual measurements. With\\nsample sizes of this order, detecting the dissimilarity between two detrital\\nage distributions produced by different catchment erosion scenarios can be\\ndifficult at a high statistical confidence level. However, there are no\\nestablished software tools to quantify the uncertainty inherent to detrital\\ntracer thermochronology as a function of sample size and spatial pattern of\\nsediment production. As a result, practitioners are often left wondering\\n“how many grains is enough to detect a certain signal?”. Here, we\\ninvestigate how sample size affects the uncertainty of detrital age\\ndistributions and how such uncertainty affects the ability to infer a\\npattern of sediment production of the upstream area. We do this using the\\nKolmogorov–Smirnov statistic as a metric of dissimilarity among\\ndistributions. From this, we perform statistical hypothesis testing by means of Monte Carlo sampling. These techniques are implemented in a new tool (ESD_thermotrace) to (i) consistently report the confidence level allowed by the sample size as a function of application-specific variables and given a set of user-defined hypothetical erosion scenarios, (ii) analyze the statistical power to discern each scenario from the uniform erosion hypothesis, and (iii) identify the erosion scenario that is least dissimilar to the observed detrital sample (if available). ESD_thermotrace is made available as a new open-source Python-based script alongside the test data. Testing between different hypothesized erosion scenarios with this tool provides thermochronologists with the minimum sample size (i.e., number of bedrock and detrital grain ages) required to answer their specific scientific question at their desired level of statistical confidence.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":12723,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Geochronology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Geochronology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-4-177-2022\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geochronology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5194/gchron-4-177-2022","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要碎屑示踪热年代学利用基岩热年代学年龄-高程剖面与从河流、冰川或其他沉积物中收集的碎屑颗粒年龄分布之间的关系来研究集水区侵蚀分布的空间变化。如果基岩年龄随海拔直线增加,那么空间上均匀的侵蚀预计会产生一个类似于集水区半对称曲线形状的碎屑年龄分布。另一种情况是,浅层分布和低层分布之间的不匹配可能表明源区产沙的空间变异性。对于试图确定沉积物产生模式的研究,由于与单个测量相关的时间和成本,碎屑样品很少超过100粒。在这个数量级的样本量下,在高统计置信度水平下,检测由不同流域侵蚀情景产生的两种碎屑分布之间的差异是很困难的。然而,目前还没有成熟的软件工具来量化碎屑示踪热年代学固有的不确定性,作为样本大小和沉积物生产空间格局的函数。因此,从业者常常会想:“多少粒才足够检测到某个信号?”在这里,我们研究了样本大小如何影响碎屑年龄分布的不确定性,以及这种不确定性如何影响上游地区沉积物生成模式的推断能力。我们使用kolmogorov - smirnov统计量作为分布之间不相似性的度量来做到这一点。在此基础上,采用蒙特卡罗抽样方法进行统计假设检验。这些技术在一个新工具(ESD_thermotrace)中实现,以(i)一致地报告样本量作为特定应用变量的函数所允许的置信水平,并给定一组用户定义的假设侵蚀情景,(ii)分析统计能力,从统一侵蚀假设中区分每种情景,以及(iii)确定与观察到的碎屑样品(如果可用)差异最小的侵蚀情景。ESD_thermotrace作为一个新的基于python的开源脚本与测试数据一起提供。使用该工具在不同假设的侵蚀情景之间进行测试,为热年代学家提供了最小样本量(即基岩和碎屑颗粒年龄的数量),以便在所需的统计置信度水平上回答他们的特定科学问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
How many grains are needed for quantifying catchment erosion from tracer thermochronology?
Abstract. Detrital tracer thermochronology utilizes the relationship between bedrock thermochronometric age–elevation profiles and a distribution of detrital grain ages collected from riverine, glacial, or other sediment to study spatial variations in the distribution of catchment erosion. If bedrock ages increase linearly with elevation, spatially uniform erosion is expected to yield a detrital age distribution that mimics the shape of a catchment's hypsometric curve. Alternatively, a mismatch between detrital and hypsometric distributions may indicate spatial variability of sediment production within the source area. For studies seeking to identify the pattern of sediment production, detrital samples rarely exceed 100 grains due to the time and costs related to individual measurements. With sample sizes of this order, detecting the dissimilarity between two detrital age distributions produced by different catchment erosion scenarios can be difficult at a high statistical confidence level. However, there are no established software tools to quantify the uncertainty inherent to detrital tracer thermochronology as a function of sample size and spatial pattern of sediment production. As a result, practitioners are often left wondering “how many grains is enough to detect a certain signal?”. Here, we investigate how sample size affects the uncertainty of detrital age distributions and how such uncertainty affects the ability to infer a pattern of sediment production of the upstream area. We do this using the Kolmogorov–Smirnov statistic as a metric of dissimilarity among distributions. From this, we perform statistical hypothesis testing by means of Monte Carlo sampling. These techniques are implemented in a new tool (ESD_thermotrace) to (i) consistently report the confidence level allowed by the sample size as a function of application-specific variables and given a set of user-defined hypothetical erosion scenarios, (ii) analyze the statistical power to discern each scenario from the uniform erosion hypothesis, and (iii) identify the erosion scenario that is least dissimilar to the observed detrital sample (if available). ESD_thermotrace is made available as a new open-source Python-based script alongside the test data. Testing between different hypothesized erosion scenarios with this tool provides thermochronologists with the minimum sample size (i.e., number of bedrock and detrital grain ages) required to answer their specific scientific question at their desired level of statistical confidence.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Geochronology
Geochronology Earth and Planetary Sciences-Paleontology
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
35
审稿时长
19 weeks
期刊最新文献
The daughter–parent plot: a tool for analyzing thermochronological data New age constraints reveal moraine stabilization thousands of years after deposition during the last deglaciation of western New York, USA Errorchrons and anchored isochrons in IsoplotR Cosmogenic 3He chronology of postglacial lava flows at Mt Ruapehu, Aotearoa / New Zealand Effect of chemical abrasion of zircon on SIMS U–Pb, δ18O, trace element, and LA-ICPMS trace element and Lu–Hf isotopic analyses
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1