和凯恩斯一起回到未来

L. Ohanian
{"title":"和凯恩斯一起回到未来","authors":"L. Ohanian","doi":"10.21034/QR.3212","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article analyzes Keynes's Economic Possibilities for our Grandchildren an essay presenting Keynes's views about economic growth into the 21st century from the perspective of modern growth theory. I find that the implicit theoretical framework used by Keynes to form his expectations about the 21st century world economy is remarkably close to modern growth models, featuring a stable steady-state growth path driven by technological progress. On the other hand, Keynes's forecast of employment in the 21st century is far off the mark, reflecting a mistaken view that the income elasticity of leisure is much higher than that of consumption.","PeriodicalId":78784,"journal":{"name":"The Quarterly review","volume":"142 1","pages":"10-16"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Back to the Future with Keynes\",\"authors\":\"L. Ohanian\",\"doi\":\"10.21034/QR.3212\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article analyzes Keynes's Economic Possibilities for our Grandchildren an essay presenting Keynes's views about economic growth into the 21st century from the perspective of modern growth theory. I find that the implicit theoretical framework used by Keynes to form his expectations about the 21st century world economy is remarkably close to modern growth models, featuring a stable steady-state growth path driven by technological progress. On the other hand, Keynes's forecast of employment in the 21st century is far off the mark, reflecting a mistaken view that the income elasticity of leisure is much higher than that of consumption.\",\"PeriodicalId\":78784,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Quarterly review\",\"volume\":\"142 1\",\"pages\":\"10-16\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2008-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Quarterly review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21034/QR.3212\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Quarterly review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21034/QR.3212","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

本文从现代增长理论的角度,分析了凯恩斯关于21世纪经济增长的观点——《我们子孙的经济可能性》。我发现,凯恩斯用来形成他对21世纪世界经济预期的隐含理论框架与现代增长模型非常接近,其特征是由技术进步驱动的稳定的稳态增长路径。另一方面,凯恩斯对21世纪就业的预测是错误的,反映了一种错误的观点,即休闲的收入弹性远远高于消费的收入弹性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Back to the Future with Keynes
This article analyzes Keynes's Economic Possibilities for our Grandchildren an essay presenting Keynes's views about economic growth into the 21st century from the perspective of modern growth theory. I find that the implicit theoretical framework used by Keynes to form his expectations about the 21st century world economy is remarkably close to modern growth models, featuring a stable steady-state growth path driven by technological progress. On the other hand, Keynes's forecast of employment in the 21st century is far off the mark, reflecting a mistaken view that the income elasticity of leisure is much higher than that of consumption.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
On Using SIR Models to Model Disease Scenarios for COVID-19 2013 Update on the U.S. Earnings, Income, and Wealth Distributional Facts: A View from Macroeconomics An Attractive Monetary Model with Surprising Implications for Optima: Two Examples Negative Equity Does Not Reduce Homeowners' Mobility 'Facts on the Distributions of Earnings, Income, and Wealth in the United States: 2007 Update
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1