行使家庭权利的限制

M. Ulianova
{"title":"行使家庭权利的限制","authors":"M. Ulianova","doi":"10.17072/1995-4190-2022-58-658-682","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: modern ideas about the exercise of rights are associated with the concepts of limits of the exercise of rights and abuse of rights. This topic is discussed in the paper with regard to the science of family law. Researchers use the concept of the abuse of parental rights in works on family law, the legislator – when referring to measures of family law protection and the extreme form of responsibility. Meanwhile, the content of the interrelated concept of the limits of the exercise of family rights has not yet been researched in detail as distinguished from other concepts. There are no works providing insight into the scope of this concept determined by its belonging to family law, no studies discussing the common and distinctive features of the concept in relation to other branches (in particular, in relation to civil law, where the abovementioned categories have been developed sufficiently). The existence of concepts that do not have a well-developed comprehensive definition negatively affects both social relations and law enforcement. Purpose: to define the concept of ‘the limits of the exercise of family rights’, to identify the attributes of the limits of the exercise of family rights, the meaning of the formation of the term. Methods: historical, comparative-legal, structural-functional. Results: the paper provides a study of the category ‘limits of the exercise of the right’ from a historical perspective; identifies the attributes of the definition of this concept, thus distinguishing it from other similar concepts; provides understanding of the limits of the exercise of family rights and fulfilment of obligations as presented in the science of family law; offers the term ‘limits of the exercise of family rights and fulfilment of obligations’. Conclusions: the conclusions drawn as a result of the research conducted can be applied in the development of scientific knowledge about the exercise of family rights and fulfillment of obligations.","PeriodicalId":42087,"journal":{"name":"Vestnik Permskogo Universiteta-Juridicheskie Nauki","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"LIMITS OF THE EXERCISE OF FAMILY RIGHTS\",\"authors\":\"M. Ulianova\",\"doi\":\"10.17072/1995-4190-2022-58-658-682\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: modern ideas about the exercise of rights are associated with the concepts of limits of the exercise of rights and abuse of rights. This topic is discussed in the paper with regard to the science of family law. Researchers use the concept of the abuse of parental rights in works on family law, the legislator – when referring to measures of family law protection and the extreme form of responsibility. Meanwhile, the content of the interrelated concept of the limits of the exercise of family rights has not yet been researched in detail as distinguished from other concepts. There are no works providing insight into the scope of this concept determined by its belonging to family law, no studies discussing the common and distinctive features of the concept in relation to other branches (in particular, in relation to civil law, where the abovementioned categories have been developed sufficiently). The existence of concepts that do not have a well-developed comprehensive definition negatively affects both social relations and law enforcement. Purpose: to define the concept of ‘the limits of the exercise of family rights’, to identify the attributes of the limits of the exercise of family rights, the meaning of the formation of the term. Methods: historical, comparative-legal, structural-functional. Results: the paper provides a study of the category ‘limits of the exercise of the right’ from a historical perspective; identifies the attributes of the definition of this concept, thus distinguishing it from other similar concepts; provides understanding of the limits of the exercise of family rights and fulfilment of obligations as presented in the science of family law; offers the term ‘limits of the exercise of family rights and fulfilment of obligations’. Conclusions: the conclusions drawn as a result of the research conducted can be applied in the development of scientific knowledge about the exercise of family rights and fulfillment of obligations.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42087,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Vestnik Permskogo Universiteta-Juridicheskie Nauki\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Vestnik Permskogo Universiteta-Juridicheskie Nauki\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17072/1995-4190-2022-58-658-682\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vestnik Permskogo Universiteta-Juridicheskie Nauki","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17072/1995-4190-2022-58-658-682","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:现代权利行使思想与权利行使的限制和权利滥用的概念相联系。本文从家庭法学的角度对这一问题进行了探讨。研究者在家事法著作中使用了父母权利滥用的概念,立法者在提及家事法保护措施和责任的极端形式时使用了这一概念。与此同时,家庭权利行使限制这一相关概念的内容与其他概念的区别尚未得到详细的研究。没有著作对这一概念的范围提供深入的见解,因为它属于家庭法,没有研究讨论这一概念与其他分支(特别是与民法有关,其中上述类别已经得到充分发展)的共同和独特特征。没有完善的全面定义的概念的存在对社会关系和执法都产生不利影响。目的:界定“家庭权利行使界限”的概念,辨明家庭权利行使界限的属性,形成该术语的含义。方法:历史学、比较法学、结构功能学。结果:本文从历史的角度对“权利行使的界限”这一范畴进行了研究;确定此概念定义的属性,从而将其与其他类似概念区分开来;提供对行使家庭权利和履行家庭法科学规定的义务的限制的理解;提供了“行使家庭权利和履行义务的限制”这一术语。结论:研究得出的结论可以应用于发展关于行使家庭权利和履行家庭义务的科学知识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
LIMITS OF THE EXERCISE OF FAMILY RIGHTS
Introduction: modern ideas about the exercise of rights are associated with the concepts of limits of the exercise of rights and abuse of rights. This topic is discussed in the paper with regard to the science of family law. Researchers use the concept of the abuse of parental rights in works on family law, the legislator – when referring to measures of family law protection and the extreme form of responsibility. Meanwhile, the content of the interrelated concept of the limits of the exercise of family rights has not yet been researched in detail as distinguished from other concepts. There are no works providing insight into the scope of this concept determined by its belonging to family law, no studies discussing the common and distinctive features of the concept in relation to other branches (in particular, in relation to civil law, where the abovementioned categories have been developed sufficiently). The existence of concepts that do not have a well-developed comprehensive definition negatively affects both social relations and law enforcement. Purpose: to define the concept of ‘the limits of the exercise of family rights’, to identify the attributes of the limits of the exercise of family rights, the meaning of the formation of the term. Methods: historical, comparative-legal, structural-functional. Results: the paper provides a study of the category ‘limits of the exercise of the right’ from a historical perspective; identifies the attributes of the definition of this concept, thus distinguishing it from other similar concepts; provides understanding of the limits of the exercise of family rights and fulfilment of obligations as presented in the science of family law; offers the term ‘limits of the exercise of family rights and fulfilment of obligations’. Conclusions: the conclusions drawn as a result of the research conducted can be applied in the development of scientific knowledge about the exercise of family rights and fulfillment of obligations.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
50.00%
发文量
7
期刊最新文献
THE AMALFI CODE (TABULA AMALFITANA): PUBLIC LAW PROVISIONS OF PRIVATE LAW ORIGIN BEHAVIORAL STANDARDS IN THE SYSTEM OF PRIVATE LAW RELATIONS RUSSIAN CONSTITUTIONALISM. A RETURN TO SACREDNESS THE AMALFI CODE (TABULA AMALFITANA): PUBLIC LAW PROVISIONS OF PRIVATE LAW ORIGIN DIVISION OF SUBJECTS OF JURISDICTION AND POWERS BETWEEN THE CENTER, REGIONS AND MUNICIPALITIES IN CONSTITUTIONS OF FEDERAL AND DECENTRALIZED COUNTRIES
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1