约翰·海恩斯的模棱两可:坐在巴文克的左边还是右边?

E. Conradie
{"title":"约翰·海恩斯的模棱两可:坐在巴文克的左边还是右边?","authors":"E. Conradie","doi":"10.5952/54-3-4-396","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Following some biographic introductory comments, the argument of this contribution proceeds in two steps. First, the distinction between Herman Bavinck’s left and right hand is clarified, amongst others with reference to the distinction between fides qua and fides quae , and illustrated with examples from the subsequent Reformed tradition. second, an analysis of Heyns’ own related theological choices is offered on this basis.","PeriodicalId":18902,"journal":{"name":"Nederduitse Gereformeerde Teologiese Tydskrif","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The ambiguity of Johan Heyns: Sitting at Bavinck’s left or right hand?\",\"authors\":\"E. Conradie\",\"doi\":\"10.5952/54-3-4-396\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Following some biographic introductory comments, the argument of this contribution proceeds in two steps. First, the distinction between Herman Bavinck’s left and right hand is clarified, amongst others with reference to the distinction between fides qua and fides quae , and illustrated with examples from the subsequent Reformed tradition. second, an analysis of Heyns’ own related theological choices is offered on this basis.\",\"PeriodicalId\":18902,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nederduitse Gereformeerde Teologiese Tydskrif\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-12-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nederduitse Gereformeerde Teologiese Tydskrif\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5952/54-3-4-396\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nederduitse Gereformeerde Teologiese Tydskrif","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5952/54-3-4-396","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

在一些传记式的介绍性评论之后,对这一贡献的论证分两个步骤进行。首先,Herman Bavinck的左手和右手之间的区别被澄清,在其他参考中,对必要信仰和必要信仰之间的区别进行了区分,并从随后的改革宗传统中举例说明。其次,在此基础上分析了海恩斯本人的相关神学选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The ambiguity of Johan Heyns: Sitting at Bavinck’s left or right hand?
Following some biographic introductory comments, the argument of this contribution proceeds in two steps. First, the distinction between Herman Bavinck’s left and right hand is clarified, amongst others with reference to the distinction between fides qua and fides quae , and illustrated with examples from the subsequent Reformed tradition. second, an analysis of Heyns’ own related theological choices is offered on this basis.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Power games: Using Foucault to shed light on the inherent power dynamics of intercultural Bible study groups. Discussion of a qualitative research project The rising prominence of John Owen: A research article of “The Ashgate Research Companion to John Owen’s Theology” Alle kaarte op die preek “Rise up and walk” : tracing the trajectory of the Carnegie discourse and plotting a way forward The relevance of Galatians 5:16-26 in the modern "spiritual intelligence" debate
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1