随着时间的推移,在马来西亚沙捞越,一个以山地水稻轮作为基础的农业系统发生了变化

J.R. Best
{"title":"随着时间的推移,在马来西亚沙捞越,一个以山地水稻轮作为基础的农业系统发生了变化","authors":"J.R. Best","doi":"10.1016/0269-7475(88)90024-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Shifting cultivation is, for around half of Sarawak's farm households, the traditional means of growing a subsistence crop of rice. It is, however, widely regarded as damaging to the environment and unsustainable in its present form, given high rates of rural population increase.</p><p>The second of these conclusions was confirmed by a socio-economic survey in 1973/74 of three villages practising a farming system based on shifting cultivation. The report on this survey forecast that farmers would turn increasingly from shifting cultivation to cash-crop production, even though this involved their entering commodity markets under uncertain if not unfavourable terms of trade.</p><p>A re-survey of the same villages in 1982 showed this forecast to be seriously inaccurate. The area under shifting cultivation had increased to absorb a sizeable population increase while cash-crop production had decreased. In one land-scarce village, mature rubber gardens had been felled in order to plant rice. Income from non-agricultural employment (mainly in the form of migrant remittances) had largely replaced the income previously earned from cash crops.</p><p>Levels of living were judged not to have declined between 1973/74 and 1982 and possibly to be more secure in the short term since they were less dependent on commodity prices. However, in the longer term the breakdown of shifting cultivation can still be foreseen, as even in relatively land-abundant villages fallow periods are approaching the critical minimum. Some technologies which use land less extravagantly have recently appeared (one an indigenous technology) and are being promoted by a Government extension service which has recently devoted more resources to work in poor and isolated regions of the State.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100060,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural Administration and Extension","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1988-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0269-7475(88)90024-4","citationCount":"18","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Change over time in a farming system based on shifting cultivation of hill rice in Sarawak, Malaysia\",\"authors\":\"J.R. Best\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/0269-7475(88)90024-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Shifting cultivation is, for around half of Sarawak's farm households, the traditional means of growing a subsistence crop of rice. It is, however, widely regarded as damaging to the environment and unsustainable in its present form, given high rates of rural population increase.</p><p>The second of these conclusions was confirmed by a socio-economic survey in 1973/74 of three villages practising a farming system based on shifting cultivation. The report on this survey forecast that farmers would turn increasingly from shifting cultivation to cash-crop production, even though this involved their entering commodity markets under uncertain if not unfavourable terms of trade.</p><p>A re-survey of the same villages in 1982 showed this forecast to be seriously inaccurate. The area under shifting cultivation had increased to absorb a sizeable population increase while cash-crop production had decreased. In one land-scarce village, mature rubber gardens had been felled in order to plant rice. Income from non-agricultural employment (mainly in the form of migrant remittances) had largely replaced the income previously earned from cash crops.</p><p>Levels of living were judged not to have declined between 1973/74 and 1982 and possibly to be more secure in the short term since they were less dependent on commodity prices. However, in the longer term the breakdown of shifting cultivation can still be foreseen, as even in relatively land-abundant villages fallow periods are approaching the critical minimum. Some technologies which use land less extravagantly have recently appeared (one an indigenous technology) and are being promoted by a Government extension service which has recently devoted more resources to work in poor and isolated regions of the State.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100060,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Agricultural Administration and Extension\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1988-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0269-7475(88)90024-4\",\"citationCount\":\"18\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Agricultural Administration and Extension\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0269747588900244\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agricultural Administration and Extension","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0269747588900244","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 18

摘要

对于沙捞越大约一半的农户来说,轮作是种植自给自足的水稻作物的传统方式。然而,人们普遍认为,鉴于农村人口的高增长率,这种方式对环境是有害的,而且是不可持续的。第二个结论得到了1973/74年对实行轮作耕作制度的三个村庄进行的社会经济调查的证实。关于这项调查的报告预测,农民将越来越多地从轮作种植转向经济作物生产,尽管这意味着他们将在不确定(如果不是不利的话)的贸易条件下进入商品市场。1982年对同一村庄的重新调查表明,这一预测严重不准确。轮作耕地面积增加,以吸收大量增加的人口,而经济作物产量却减少了。在一个土地稀缺的村庄,为了种植水稻,成熟的橡胶园被砍伐了。非农业就业的收入(主要以移徙者汇款的形式)已在很大程度上取代了以前从经济作物获得的收入。据判断,生活水平在1973/74年至1982年期间没有下降,而且可能在短期内更有保障,因为它们较少依赖商品价格。但是,从较长期来看,仍然可以预见轮作耕作的中断,因为即使在土地相对丰富的村庄,休耕期也接近最低限度。最近出现了一些使用土地较少的技术(一种是土著技术),并得到政府推广服务部门的推广,该部门最近将更多的资源用于该国贫穷和偏远地区的工作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Change over time in a farming system based on shifting cultivation of hill rice in Sarawak, Malaysia

Shifting cultivation is, for around half of Sarawak's farm households, the traditional means of growing a subsistence crop of rice. It is, however, widely regarded as damaging to the environment and unsustainable in its present form, given high rates of rural population increase.

The second of these conclusions was confirmed by a socio-economic survey in 1973/74 of three villages practising a farming system based on shifting cultivation. The report on this survey forecast that farmers would turn increasingly from shifting cultivation to cash-crop production, even though this involved their entering commodity markets under uncertain if not unfavourable terms of trade.

A re-survey of the same villages in 1982 showed this forecast to be seriously inaccurate. The area under shifting cultivation had increased to absorb a sizeable population increase while cash-crop production had decreased. In one land-scarce village, mature rubber gardens had been felled in order to plant rice. Income from non-agricultural employment (mainly in the form of migrant remittances) had largely replaced the income previously earned from cash crops.

Levels of living were judged not to have declined between 1973/74 and 1982 and possibly to be more secure in the short term since they were less dependent on commodity prices. However, in the longer term the breakdown of shifting cultivation can still be foreseen, as even in relatively land-abundant villages fallow periods are approaching the critical minimum. Some technologies which use land less extravagantly have recently appeared (one an indigenous technology) and are being promoted by a Government extension service which has recently devoted more resources to work in poor and isolated regions of the State.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Editorial Editorial Board Guest editorial Editorial
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1