{"title":"无限概率数据库","authors":"Martin Grohe, P. Lindner","doi":"10.46298/lmcs-18(1:34)2022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Probabilistic databases (PDBs) model uncertainty in data in a quantitative\nway. In the established formal framework, probabilistic (relational) databases\nare finite probability spaces over relational database instances. This\nfiniteness can clash with intuitive query behavior (Ceylan et al., KR 2016),\nand with application scenarios that are better modeled by continuous\nprobability distributions (Dalvi et al., CACM 2009).\n We formally introduced infinite PDBs in (Grohe and Lindner, PODS 2019) with a\nprimary focus on countably infinite spaces. However, an extension beyond\ncountable probability spaces raises nontrivial foundational issues concerned\nwith the measurability of events and queries and ultimately with the question\nwhether queries have a well-defined semantics.\n We argue that finite point processes are an appropriate model from\nprobability theory for dealing with general probabilistic databases. This\nallows us to construct suitable (uncountable) probability spaces of database\ninstances in a systematic way. Our main technical results are measurability\nstatements for relational algebra queries as well as aggregate queries and\nDatalog queries.","PeriodicalId":90482,"journal":{"name":"Database theory-- ICDT : International Conference ... proceedings. International Conference on Database Theory","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"14","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Infinite Probabilistic Databases\",\"authors\":\"Martin Grohe, P. Lindner\",\"doi\":\"10.46298/lmcs-18(1:34)2022\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Probabilistic databases (PDBs) model uncertainty in data in a quantitative\\nway. In the established formal framework, probabilistic (relational) databases\\nare finite probability spaces over relational database instances. This\\nfiniteness can clash with intuitive query behavior (Ceylan et al., KR 2016),\\nand with application scenarios that are better modeled by continuous\\nprobability distributions (Dalvi et al., CACM 2009).\\n We formally introduced infinite PDBs in (Grohe and Lindner, PODS 2019) with a\\nprimary focus on countably infinite spaces. However, an extension beyond\\ncountable probability spaces raises nontrivial foundational issues concerned\\nwith the measurability of events and queries and ultimately with the question\\nwhether queries have a well-defined semantics.\\n We argue that finite point processes are an appropriate model from\\nprobability theory for dealing with general probabilistic databases. This\\nallows us to construct suitable (uncountable) probability spaces of database\\ninstances in a systematic way. Our main technical results are measurability\\nstatements for relational algebra queries as well as aggregate queries and\\nDatalog queries.\",\"PeriodicalId\":90482,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Database theory-- ICDT : International Conference ... proceedings. International Conference on Database Theory\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-04-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"14\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Database theory-- ICDT : International Conference ... proceedings. International Conference on Database Theory\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.46298/lmcs-18(1:34)2022\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Database theory-- ICDT : International Conference ... proceedings. International Conference on Database Theory","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46298/lmcs-18(1:34)2022","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

摘要

概率数据库(PDBs)以定量的方式对数据中的不确定性进行建模。在已建立的正式框架中,概率(关系)数据库是关系数据库实例上的有限概率空间。这种有限性可能与直观的查询行为(Ceylan et al., KR 2016)以及通过连续概率分布更好地建模的应用场景(Dalvi et al., ccm 2009)相冲突。我们在(Grohe and Lindner, PODS 2019)中正式引入了无限pdb,主要关注可数无限空间。然而,超越可数概率空间的扩展引发了与事件和查询的可度量性有关的重要基础问题,并最终引发了查询是否具有良好定义的语义的问题。本文认为,有限点过程是概率论中处理一般概率数据库的合适模型。这允许我们以系统的方式构建数据库实例的合适(不可数)概率空间。我们的主要技术成果是关系代数查询以及聚合查询和数据查询的可度量语句。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Infinite Probabilistic Databases
Probabilistic databases (PDBs) model uncertainty in data in a quantitative way. In the established formal framework, probabilistic (relational) databases are finite probability spaces over relational database instances. This finiteness can clash with intuitive query behavior (Ceylan et al., KR 2016), and with application scenarios that are better modeled by continuous probability distributions (Dalvi et al., CACM 2009). We formally introduced infinite PDBs in (Grohe and Lindner, PODS 2019) with a primary focus on countably infinite spaces. However, an extension beyond countable probability spaces raises nontrivial foundational issues concerned with the measurability of events and queries and ultimately with the question whether queries have a well-defined semantics. We argue that finite point processes are an appropriate model from probability theory for dealing with general probabilistic databases. This allows us to construct suitable (uncountable) probability spaces of database instances in a systematic way. Our main technical results are measurability statements for relational algebra queries as well as aggregate queries and Datalog queries.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Generalizing Greenwald-Khanna Streaming Quantile Summaries for Weighted Inputs A Simple Algorithm for Consistent Query Answering under Primary Keys Size Bounds and Algorithms for Conjunctive Regular Path Queries Compact Data Structures Meet Databases (Invited Talk) Enumerating Subgraphs of Constant Sizes in External Memory
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1