{"title":"《来自神话的怪物，以及对科学原理的探索，或者，科学记者对神话动物的看法》。探索马特·卡普兰的《怪物科学》，探讨美杜莎的病因和文化用途","authors":"E. Nissan","doi":"10.5209/AMAL.58836","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We consider some of the chapters in Matt Kaplan’s The Science of Monsters and his rationalising conjectures (some of them rooted in hypotheses by Adrienne Mayor), and discuss or provide supplementary data, including concerning occurrence in modern art or literature.","PeriodicalId":40412,"journal":{"name":"Amaltea-Revista de MitocrItica","volume":"36 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Monsters from Myth, and Quests for a Scientific Rationale, Or, a Science Journalist’s Take on Mythological Animals. An Exploration of Matt Kaplan’s The Science of Monsters, with a Foray into Aetiologies and Cultural Uses of Medusa\",\"authors\":\"E. Nissan\",\"doi\":\"10.5209/AMAL.58836\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We consider some of the chapters in Matt Kaplan’s The Science of Monsters and his rationalising conjectures (some of them rooted in hypotheses by Adrienne Mayor), and discuss or provide supplementary data, including concerning occurrence in modern art or literature.\",\"PeriodicalId\":40412,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Amaltea-Revista de MitocrItica\",\"volume\":\"36 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-06-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Amaltea-Revista de MitocrItica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5209/AMAL.58836\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Amaltea-Revista de MitocrItica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5209/AMAL.58836","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Monsters from Myth, and Quests for a Scientific Rationale, Or, a Science Journalist’s Take on Mythological Animals. An Exploration of Matt Kaplan’s The Science of Monsters, with a Foray into Aetiologies and Cultural Uses of Medusa
We consider some of the chapters in Matt Kaplan’s The Science of Monsters and his rationalising conjectures (some of them rooted in hypotheses by Adrienne Mayor), and discuss or provide supplementary data, including concerning occurrence in modern art or literature.
期刊介绍：
Founded in 2008 by José Manuel Losada, Amaltea (ISSN-e 1989-1709) is a journal of myth criticism with intimate connections to Asteria, the International Association of Myth Criticism, and the Universidad Complutense de Madrid. Its object of study is the way ancient, medieval and modern myths are perceived and adapted in literature and the arts from 1900 to the present day.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
