{"title":"如何建立相变模型?1937-1970年不断变化的方法","authors":"Martin Niss","doi":"10.1140/epjh/s13129-021-00024-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The paper aims at characterising and documenting a fundamental change in how phase transitions were modelled microscopically in the period 1937–1970. At first, physicists took what will be called <i>a naturalistic approach</i> to phase transitions such as the condensation of gases and the Curie point of ferromagnets. Here the purpose was to explain the phenomenon in question, i.e., to show that a model exhibits the same features as the phenomenon. The scope of this approach was broad, as the goal was to account for several aspects of the phenomenon. The employed model should be very realistic and close to the foundational theory, be it classical or quantum mechanics. In the 1960s, the physicists used an alternative approach that they termed <i>a caricature approach. </i>This approach not only required explanation in the above sense but also understanding of the physical phenomenon, i.e. insights into why the phenomenon behaves as it does. The scope was limited to certain aspects of the phenomenon, such as the behaviour near the critical point. The caricature approach used a hierarchy of models, ranging from realistic ones over more simplified models to models that were mere caricatures of the system in question. Hence, the two approaches represent very different orientations when it comes to the purpose and scope, the organisation of the resulting theories, and what models are acceptable.\n</p></div>","PeriodicalId":791,"journal":{"name":"The European Physical Journal H","volume":"46 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How to model phase transitions? The changing approaches 1937–1970\",\"authors\":\"Martin Niss\",\"doi\":\"10.1140/epjh/s13129-021-00024-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The paper aims at characterising and documenting a fundamental change in how phase transitions were modelled microscopically in the period 1937–1970. At first, physicists took what will be called <i>a naturalistic approach</i> to phase transitions such as the condensation of gases and the Curie point of ferromagnets. Here the purpose was to explain the phenomenon in question, i.e., to show that a model exhibits the same features as the phenomenon. The scope of this approach was broad, as the goal was to account for several aspects of the phenomenon. The employed model should be very realistic and close to the foundational theory, be it classical or quantum mechanics. In the 1960s, the physicists used an alternative approach that they termed <i>a caricature approach. </i>This approach not only required explanation in the above sense but also understanding of the physical phenomenon, i.e. insights into why the phenomenon behaves as it does. The scope was limited to certain aspects of the phenomenon, such as the behaviour near the critical point. The caricature approach used a hierarchy of models, ranging from realistic ones over more simplified models to models that were mere caricatures of the system in question. Hence, the two approaches represent very different orientations when it comes to the purpose and scope, the organisation of the resulting theories, and what models are acceptable.\\n</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":791,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The European Physical Journal H\",\"volume\":\"46 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The European Physical Journal H\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"4\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1140/epjh/s13129-021-00024-7\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"物理与天体物理\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The European Physical Journal H","FirstCategoryId":"4","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1140/epjh/s13129-021-00024-7","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
How to model phase transitions? The changing approaches 1937–1970
The paper aims at characterising and documenting a fundamental change in how phase transitions were modelled microscopically in the period 1937–1970. At first, physicists took what will be called a naturalistic approach to phase transitions such as the condensation of gases and the Curie point of ferromagnets. Here the purpose was to explain the phenomenon in question, i.e., to show that a model exhibits the same features as the phenomenon. The scope of this approach was broad, as the goal was to account for several aspects of the phenomenon. The employed model should be very realistic and close to the foundational theory, be it classical or quantum mechanics. In the 1960s, the physicists used an alternative approach that they termed a caricature approach. This approach not only required explanation in the above sense but also understanding of the physical phenomenon, i.e. insights into why the phenomenon behaves as it does. The scope was limited to certain aspects of the phenomenon, such as the behaviour near the critical point. The caricature approach used a hierarchy of models, ranging from realistic ones over more simplified models to models that were mere caricatures of the system in question. Hence, the two approaches represent very different orientations when it comes to the purpose and scope, the organisation of the resulting theories, and what models are acceptable.
期刊介绍:
The purpose of this journal is to catalyse, foster, and disseminate an awareness and understanding of the historical development of ideas in contemporary physics, and more generally, ideas about how Nature works.
The scope explicitly includes:
- Contributions addressing the history of physics and of physical ideas and concepts, the interplay of physics and mathematics as well as the natural sciences, and the history and philosophy of sciences, together with discussions of experimental ideas and designs - inasmuch as they clearly relate, and preferably add, to the understanding of modern physics.
- Annotated and/or contextual translations of relevant foreign-language texts.
- Careful characterisations of old and/or abandoned ideas including past mistakes and false leads, thereby helping working physicists to assess how compelling contemporary ideas may turn out to be in future, i.e. with hindsight.