子宫内膜癌的手术治疗:如果我们不进行术中活检会发生什么?

María Cuadra, Nagore Ceberio, María Rodríguez, José Luis Mendizabal, Javier Gorostiaga, Iñaki Lete
{"title":"子宫内膜癌的手术治疗:如果我们不进行术中活检会发生什么?","authors":"María Cuadra,&nbsp;Nagore Ceberio,&nbsp;María Rodríguez,&nbsp;José Luis Mendizabal,&nbsp;Javier Gorostiaga,&nbsp;Iñaki Lete","doi":"10.1016/j.pog.2015.05.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>To analyse differences between preoperative and postoperative staging in a series of patients with endometrial cancer who underwent surgery in our department.</p></div><div><h3>Material and methods</h3><p>We conducted a retrospective study of malignant endometrial tumours treated by laparoscopic surgery between January 1<sup>st</sup> 2005 and August 31<sup>st</sup> 2014. We calculated the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of magnetic resonance imaging and biopsy performed before the intervention. We estimated the percentage of women at risk of over- and under-treatment if intraoperative biopsy had not been performed.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>We included 174 malignant endometrial tumours. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of magnetic resonance imaging was 95.09, 63.33, 93.37 and 70.37%, respectively. For preoperative biopsy, the results were sensitivity (90.91%), specificity (65.38%), positive predictive value (74.77%) and negative predictive value. (86.44%). If intraoperative biopsy had not been performed, 12 of 166 (12.65%) women in stage 1 would have been undertreated and 3.61% would have been overtreated.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Intraoperative biopsy should be mandatory in the early the stages of endometrial cancer to avoid under- and over-treatment.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":35677,"journal":{"name":"Progresos en Obstetricia y Ginecologia","volume":"58 10","pages":"Pages 446-451"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.pog.2015.05.007","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Tratamiento quirúrgico del cáncer de endometrio: ¿qué pasaría si no realizamos biopsia intraoperatoria?\",\"authors\":\"María Cuadra,&nbsp;Nagore Ceberio,&nbsp;María Rodríguez,&nbsp;José Luis Mendizabal,&nbsp;Javier Gorostiaga,&nbsp;Iñaki Lete\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.pog.2015.05.007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>To analyse differences between preoperative and postoperative staging in a series of patients with endometrial cancer who underwent surgery in our department.</p></div><div><h3>Material and methods</h3><p>We conducted a retrospective study of malignant endometrial tumours treated by laparoscopic surgery between January 1<sup>st</sup> 2005 and August 31<sup>st</sup> 2014. We calculated the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of magnetic resonance imaging and biopsy performed before the intervention. We estimated the percentage of women at risk of over- and under-treatment if intraoperative biopsy had not been performed.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>We included 174 malignant endometrial tumours. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of magnetic resonance imaging was 95.09, 63.33, 93.37 and 70.37%, respectively. For preoperative biopsy, the results were sensitivity (90.91%), specificity (65.38%), positive predictive value (74.77%) and negative predictive value. (86.44%). If intraoperative biopsy had not been performed, 12 of 166 (12.65%) women in stage 1 would have been undertreated and 3.61% would have been overtreated.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Intraoperative biopsy should be mandatory in the early the stages of endometrial cancer to avoid under- and over-treatment.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":35677,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Progresos en Obstetricia y Ginecologia\",\"volume\":\"58 10\",\"pages\":\"Pages 446-451\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.pog.2015.05.007\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Progresos en Obstetricia y Ginecologia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304501315001557\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Progresos en Obstetricia y Ginecologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304501315001557","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

目的分析我科子宫内膜癌手术患者术前、术后分期的差异。材料与方法回顾性分析2005年1月1日至2014年8月31日腹腔镜手术治疗的恶性子宫内膜肿瘤。计算干预前磁共振成像和活检的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值和阴性预测值。如果术中未进行活检,我们估计了存在治疗过度和治疗不足风险的妇女的百分比。结果纳入子宫内膜恶性肿瘤174例。磁共振成像的敏感性为95.09,特异性为63.33,阳性预测值为93.37,阴性预测值为70.37%。术前活检结果敏感性(90.91%)、特异性(65.38%)、阳性预测值(74.77%)、阴性预测值。(86.44%)。如果术中不进行活检,166例1期患者中有12例(12.65%)治疗不足,3.61%治疗过度。结论子宫内膜癌早期应强制术中活检,以避免治疗不足和过度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Tratamiento quirúrgico del cáncer de endometrio: ¿qué pasaría si no realizamos biopsia intraoperatoria?

Objectives

To analyse differences between preoperative and postoperative staging in a series of patients with endometrial cancer who underwent surgery in our department.

Material and methods

We conducted a retrospective study of malignant endometrial tumours treated by laparoscopic surgery between January 1st 2005 and August 31st 2014. We calculated the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of magnetic resonance imaging and biopsy performed before the intervention. We estimated the percentage of women at risk of over- and under-treatment if intraoperative biopsy had not been performed.

Results

We included 174 malignant endometrial tumours. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of magnetic resonance imaging was 95.09, 63.33, 93.37 and 70.37%, respectively. For preoperative biopsy, the results were sensitivity (90.91%), specificity (65.38%), positive predictive value (74.77%) and negative predictive value. (86.44%). If intraoperative biopsy had not been performed, 12 of 166 (12.65%) women in stage 1 would have been undertreated and 3.61% would have been overtreated.

Conclusion

Intraoperative biopsy should be mandatory in the early the stages of endometrial cancer to avoid under- and over-treatment.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Progresos en Obstetricia y Ginecologia
Progresos en Obstetricia y Ginecologia Medicine-Obstetrics and Gynecology
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Es la Revista Oficial de la Sociedad Española de Ginecología y Obstetricia, y está presente en los más prestigiosos índices de referencia en medicina. Sus contenidos, clasificados en función de 4 grandes áreas (reproducción y endocrinología, perinatología, oncología y ginecología general) resultan de máxima utilidad para el especialista.
期刊最新文献
Evolución de los síntomas de vejiga hiperactiva tras la cirugía de prolapso genital Protocolo de prevención de sinequias genitales en pacientes con síndrome de Stevens Johnson y necrólisis epidérmica tóxica (síndrome de Lyell) Aborto farmacológico en el primer trimestre de la gestación: ¿dónde estamos en el año 2018? Embarazo ectópico sobre cicatriz de cesárea Proteína C reactiva y doppler de arterias uterinas en preeclámpticas
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1