经合组织国家使用DRG系统对重症监护病房服务进行成本核算

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Australian Health Review Pub Date : 2022-12-31 DOI:10.54042/hr631hhsma
Maria Mastrogianni, P. Galanis, D. Kaitelidou, T. Katsoulas
{"title":"经合组织国家使用DRG系统对重症监护病房服务进行成本核算","authors":"Maria Mastrogianni, P. Galanis, D. Kaitelidou, T. Katsoulas","doi":"10.54042/hr631hhsma","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The trend for quality, efficient, and productive financing of health service providers, especially Intensive Care Units (ICUs), has become increasingly evident in recent decades. In this study, we investigate the prospective reimburse- ment method, per case of hospitalization in the ICU, according to the Diagnostic Related Groups (DRGs), in the OECD countries, as well as the appropriateness of using the method, in the particular environment of the ICU. A systematic review of papers published up until July 2022 was conducted. The search was performed on PubMed, Medline, Scopus, ScienceDirect, and Google Scholar. The criteria for inclusion in this review were the calculation by researchers of the appropriateness of using DRGs in the ICU, as a method of reimbursement, through comparison with the actual cost of hospitalization of patients in the ICU. Only sixteen(16) of the scientific papers retrieved met the criteria for inclusion in this review. Ten(10) studies assessed the appropriateness of applying DRGs as a reim- bursement method in adult ICUs and six(6) assessed the appropriateness of applying DRGs as a reimbursement method in Neonatal Intensive Care Units and pediatric ICUs. Discrepancies were observed between the actual cost of hospitalization and the reimbursement amount in all categories of ICUs. Finding the right DRG system, combined with other financing methods, would be a useful policy tool to help manage finances, contain costs, and provide quality health services.","PeriodicalId":55425,"journal":{"name":"Australian Health Review","volume":"6 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Costing of Services in Intensive Care Unit by using DRG system in OECD countries\",\"authors\":\"Maria Mastrogianni, P. Galanis, D. Kaitelidou, T. Katsoulas\",\"doi\":\"10.54042/hr631hhsma\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The trend for quality, efficient, and productive financing of health service providers, especially Intensive Care Units (ICUs), has become increasingly evident in recent decades. In this study, we investigate the prospective reimburse- ment method, per case of hospitalization in the ICU, according to the Diagnostic Related Groups (DRGs), in the OECD countries, as well as the appropriateness of using the method, in the particular environment of the ICU. A systematic review of papers published up until July 2022 was conducted. The search was performed on PubMed, Medline, Scopus, ScienceDirect, and Google Scholar. The criteria for inclusion in this review were the calculation by researchers of the appropriateness of using DRGs in the ICU, as a method of reimbursement, through comparison with the actual cost of hospitalization of patients in the ICU. Only sixteen(16) of the scientific papers retrieved met the criteria for inclusion in this review. Ten(10) studies assessed the appropriateness of applying DRGs as a reim- bursement method in adult ICUs and six(6) assessed the appropriateness of applying DRGs as a reimbursement method in Neonatal Intensive Care Units and pediatric ICUs. Discrepancies were observed between the actual cost of hospitalization and the reimbursement amount in all categories of ICUs. Finding the right DRG system, combined with other financing methods, would be a useful policy tool to help manage finances, contain costs, and provide quality health services.\",\"PeriodicalId\":55425,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australian Health Review\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australian Health Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.54042/hr631hhsma\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Health Review","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54042/hr631hhsma","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

近几十年来,向卫生服务提供者,特别是重症监护病房(icu)提供优质、高效和富有成效的融资的趋势日益明显。在本研究中,我们根据经合组织国家的诊断相关组(DRGs)调查了在ICU住院的每个病例的前瞻性报销方法,以及在ICU的特定环境中使用该方法的适当性。对截止到2022年7月发表的论文进行了系统评价。搜索在PubMed, Medline, Scopus, ScienceDirect和Google Scholar上进行。纳入本综述的标准是研究人员通过比较ICU患者的实际住院费用,计算在ICU使用DRGs作为一种报销方法的适宜性。检索到的科学论文中只有16篇符合纳入本综述的标准。10项研究评估了将DRGs作为成人重症监护病房报销方式的适宜性,6项研究评估了将DRGs作为新生儿重症监护病房和儿科重症监护病房报销方式的适宜性。在所有类别的icu中,实际住院费用与报销金额之间存在差异。找到合适的DRG制度,结合其他融资方法,将是一个有用的政策工具,有助于管理财务、控制成本和提供高质量的卫生服务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Costing of Services in Intensive Care Unit by using DRG system in OECD countries
The trend for quality, efficient, and productive financing of health service providers, especially Intensive Care Units (ICUs), has become increasingly evident in recent decades. In this study, we investigate the prospective reimburse- ment method, per case of hospitalization in the ICU, according to the Diagnostic Related Groups (DRGs), in the OECD countries, as well as the appropriateness of using the method, in the particular environment of the ICU. A systematic review of papers published up until July 2022 was conducted. The search was performed on PubMed, Medline, Scopus, ScienceDirect, and Google Scholar. The criteria for inclusion in this review were the calculation by researchers of the appropriateness of using DRGs in the ICU, as a method of reimbursement, through comparison with the actual cost of hospitalization of patients in the ICU. Only sixteen(16) of the scientific papers retrieved met the criteria for inclusion in this review. Ten(10) studies assessed the appropriateness of applying DRGs as a reim- bursement method in adult ICUs and six(6) assessed the appropriateness of applying DRGs as a reimbursement method in Neonatal Intensive Care Units and pediatric ICUs. Discrepancies were observed between the actual cost of hospitalization and the reimbursement amount in all categories of ICUs. Finding the right DRG system, combined with other financing methods, would be a useful policy tool to help manage finances, contain costs, and provide quality health services.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Australian Health Review
Australian Health Review 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
5.60%
发文量
134
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Australian Health Review is an international, peer-reviewed journal that publishes contributions on all aspects of health policy, management and governance; healthcare delivery systems; workforce; health financing; and other matters of interest to those working in health care. In addition to analyses and commentary, the journal publishes original research from practitioners – managers and clinicians – and reports of breakthrough projects that demonstrate better ways of delivering care. Australian Health Review explores major national and international health issues and questions, enabling health professionals to keep their fingers on the pulse of the nation’s health decisions and to know what the most influential commentators and decision makers are thinking. Australian Health Review is a valuable resource for managers, policy makers and clinical staff in health organisations, including government departments, hospitals, community centres and aged-care facilities, as well as anyone with an interest in the health industry. Australian Health Review is published by CSIRO Publishing on behalf of the Australian Healthcare and Hospitals Association.
期刊最新文献
Implementation of physiotherapy-led lung ultrasound in the intensive care unit. Clinical governance implications of a Victorian coronial finding regarding contrast-related anaphylaxis for health services and private providers of radiology services. Implementation of an in-reach rehabilitation program can increase the rate of discharge home from acute hospital care. Establishment of the first Australian public and health-professional palliative care advice service: exploring caller needs and gaps in care. Evaluating an implementation of the Australian National Guidelines for the On-Screen Display of Discharge Summaries.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1