临床研究消费者的确认偏误证明了实施科学的必要性

J. Meza
{"title":"临床研究消费者的确认偏误证明了实施科学的必要性","authors":"J. Meza","doi":"10.22237/CRP/1549411620","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Journal's Editor holds that, although Evidence-based medicine typically only looks for bias of the research design, still evidence-based practice must also include the biases of those using the research evidence and how it is deployed in clinical practice.","PeriodicalId":10422,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Research In Practice: The Journal of Team Hippocrates","volume":"49 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Confirmation bias by consumers of clinical research demonstrates the need for implementation science\",\"authors\":\"J. Meza\",\"doi\":\"10.22237/CRP/1549411620\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The Journal's Editor holds that, although Evidence-based medicine typically only looks for bias of the research design, still evidence-based practice must also include the biases of those using the research evidence and how it is deployed in clinical practice.\",\"PeriodicalId\":10422,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Research In Practice: The Journal of Team Hippocrates\",\"volume\":\"49 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-02-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Research In Practice: The Journal of Team Hippocrates\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22237/CRP/1549411620\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Research In Practice: The Journal of Team Hippocrates","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22237/CRP/1549411620","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

《华尔街日报》的编辑认为,尽管循证医学通常只寻找研究设计的偏见,但循证实践也必须包括那些使用研究证据的人的偏见,以及它如何在临床实践中应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Confirmation bias by consumers of clinical research demonstrates the need for implementation science
The Journal's Editor holds that, although Evidence-based medicine typically only looks for bias of the research design, still evidence-based practice must also include the biases of those using the research evidence and how it is deployed in clinical practice.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Operative versus nonoperative management for diverticulitis complicated by abscess Simplifying treatment from double-inhaler to single-inhaler triple therapy in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease Buprenorphine for pain management vs. chronic hydrocodone-acetaminophen therapy when comorbidities increase the risk of opioid-related side effects Safety and cost effectiveness of immediate sequential bilateral cataracts surgery Radiofreqency device as an alternative therapy for refractory nasal valve collapse
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1