利用工具耳虫了解积极和消极无意识认知之间的重叠

IF 0.6 0 MUSIC Psychomusicology Pub Date : 2018-07-01 DOI:10.1037/pmu0000217
Ella K. Moeck, I. Hyman, Melanie K. T. Takarangi
{"title":"利用工具耳虫了解积极和消极无意识认知之间的重叠","authors":"Ella K. Moeck, I. Hyman, Melanie K. T. Takarangi","doi":"10.1037/pmu0000217","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Involuntary cognitions—thoughts that arise spontaneously without conscious effort—are an everyday phenomenon. These cognitions include future thoughts, autobiographical memories, and, perhaps most commonly, earworms. Earworms—the experience of having a song stuck in your head—provide a window into the mind. We used earworms of instrumental music to investigate whether the likelihood of music returning involuntarily depends on the music’s emotional valence. We generalize these findings to understand the possible similarities and differences between positive and negative involuntary cognitions. We also assessed whether the music’s familiarity influences the likelihood of it returning involuntarily. We exposed participants (n = 143) to positive or negative instrumental film music that was low versus high in familiarity, and measured subsequent frequency, duration, and characteristics of earworms inside and outside the lab. We effectively induced earworms; 94% of participants experienced earworms inside the lab and 62% over the subsequent 8 hr. All participants experienced a similar number of earworms, regardless of the music’s emotional valence, but these earworms differed in quality. Participants reported earworms for negative music as more distressing and subjectively less frequent than earworms for positive music. Contrary to existing earworm research, the music’s familiarity had no effect on the presence or qualitative experience of earworms. Our findings suggest that involuntary cognitions for positive and negative content are similar in their frequency, but distinctive in how they are experienced (e.g., distress ratings).","PeriodicalId":29942,"journal":{"name":"Psychomusicology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"13","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Understanding the Overlap Between Positive and Negative Involuntary Cognitions Using Instrumental Earworms\",\"authors\":\"Ella K. Moeck, I. Hyman, Melanie K. T. Takarangi\",\"doi\":\"10.1037/pmu0000217\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Involuntary cognitions—thoughts that arise spontaneously without conscious effort—are an everyday phenomenon. These cognitions include future thoughts, autobiographical memories, and, perhaps most commonly, earworms. Earworms—the experience of having a song stuck in your head—provide a window into the mind. We used earworms of instrumental music to investigate whether the likelihood of music returning involuntarily depends on the music’s emotional valence. We generalize these findings to understand the possible similarities and differences between positive and negative involuntary cognitions. We also assessed whether the music’s familiarity influences the likelihood of it returning involuntarily. We exposed participants (n = 143) to positive or negative instrumental film music that was low versus high in familiarity, and measured subsequent frequency, duration, and characteristics of earworms inside and outside the lab. We effectively induced earworms; 94% of participants experienced earworms inside the lab and 62% over the subsequent 8 hr. All participants experienced a similar number of earworms, regardless of the music’s emotional valence, but these earworms differed in quality. Participants reported earworms for negative music as more distressing and subjectively less frequent than earworms for positive music. Contrary to existing earworm research, the music’s familiarity had no effect on the presence or qualitative experience of earworms. Our findings suggest that involuntary cognitions for positive and negative content are similar in their frequency, but distinctive in how they are experienced (e.g., distress ratings).\",\"PeriodicalId\":29942,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychomusicology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"13\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychomusicology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1037/pmu0000217\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"MUSIC\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychomusicology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/pmu0000217","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"MUSIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

摘要

不自觉的认知——不需要有意识的努力而自发产生的想法——是一种日常现象。这些认知包括未来的想法,自传式记忆,也许最常见的是,耳朵虫。耳朵虫——一种歌曲在你脑海中萦绕的体验——为你打开了一扇通往心灵的窗户。我们使用器乐的耳虫来研究音乐不自觉回归的可能性是否取决于音乐的情感效价。我们总结这些发现,以了解积极和消极无意识认知之间可能的异同。我们还评估了对音乐的熟悉程度是否会影响它不自觉地返回的可能性。我们将参与者(n = 143)暴露在熟悉程度高低的积极或消极的器乐电影音乐中,并测量了实验室内和室外耳虫的频率、持续时间和特征。我们有效地诱导了耳虫;94%的参与者在实验室里经历了耳虫,62%的参与者在接下来的8小时里经历了耳虫。不管音乐的情感价值如何,所有参与者都经历了相似数量的耳虫,但这些耳虫的质量不同。参与者报告说,消极音乐的耳虫比积极音乐的耳虫更令人痛苦,主观上也更少。与现有的耳虫研究相反,对音乐的熟悉程度对耳虫的存在或定性体验没有影响。我们的研究结果表明,积极和消极内容的非自愿认知在频率上是相似的,但在体验方式上是不同的(例如,痛苦等级)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Understanding the Overlap Between Positive and Negative Involuntary Cognitions Using Instrumental Earworms
Involuntary cognitions—thoughts that arise spontaneously without conscious effort—are an everyday phenomenon. These cognitions include future thoughts, autobiographical memories, and, perhaps most commonly, earworms. Earworms—the experience of having a song stuck in your head—provide a window into the mind. We used earworms of instrumental music to investigate whether the likelihood of music returning involuntarily depends on the music’s emotional valence. We generalize these findings to understand the possible similarities and differences between positive and negative involuntary cognitions. We also assessed whether the music’s familiarity influences the likelihood of it returning involuntarily. We exposed participants (n = 143) to positive or negative instrumental film music that was low versus high in familiarity, and measured subsequent frequency, duration, and characteristics of earworms inside and outside the lab. We effectively induced earworms; 94% of participants experienced earworms inside the lab and 62% over the subsequent 8 hr. All participants experienced a similar number of earworms, regardless of the music’s emotional valence, but these earworms differed in quality. Participants reported earworms for negative music as more distressing and subjectively less frequent than earworms for positive music. Contrary to existing earworm research, the music’s familiarity had no effect on the presence or qualitative experience of earworms. Our findings suggest that involuntary cognitions for positive and negative content are similar in their frequency, but distinctive in how they are experienced (e.g., distress ratings).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Psychomusicology
Psychomusicology Multiple-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
期刊最新文献
Supplemental Material for Preferred Music Listening Does Not Affect Cognitive Inhibition in Young and Older Adults Preferred music listening does not affect cognitive inhibition in young and older adults. Capturing coordination and intentionality in joint musical improvisation. Supplemental Material for Capturing Coordination and Intentionality in Joint Musical Improvisation Absolute pitch: A literature review of underlying factors, with special regard to music pedagogy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1