书评:武汉封锁

IF 3.2 2区 文学 Q1 COMMUNICATION Global Media and China Pub Date : 2023-02-07 DOI:10.1177/20594364231152317
Jeroen de Kloet
{"title":"书评:武汉封锁","authors":"Jeroen de Kloet","doi":"10.1177/20594364231152317","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It was in 1919, more than 100 years ago, that the Irish poet W.B. Yeats wrote ‘The second coming’, of which the most quoted lines are probably Things fall apart; the centre cannot hold. Today, a century later, somehow, these words seem to resonate uncomfortably well the times we are living in. War, climate change, geopolitical tensions, a pandemic: life has become saturated with uncertainty and instability. How to make sense of our current times? What task is left for us, academics? In my reading of Guobin Yang’s new book on the Wuhan lockdown, the answer is that we need now – maybe more urgently than before – detailed, empirical, site-specific studies to grasp what is going on. Or, at least, to try our utmost to grasp the current conjuncture. Such works steer away from easy generalisations; instead, they present us with ambivalences, contradictions, if not paradoxes, and as such refuse to give convenient answers. Yang’s study is a well-researched analysis of the Wuhan lockdown, drawing on an elaborate online ethnography that includes diaries, WeChat groups, WeChat moments, news reports, poems, interviews, Sina Weibo postings, policy documents, press conferences, and so on. While circumstances forced such an approach – the author could not enter China for obvious reasons – the result is both an exemplary study of the possibilities of online research methodologies as well as an empirically and theoretically rich account of the starting months of the pandemic. Building on his previous work, Yang convincingly draws on ample case studies to guide us through the start of the pandemic, roughly from December 2019 to April 2020, zooming in on one city, Wuhan. Allow me a very brief, and therefore incomplete, overview of its nine chapters, with some more reflection on the conclusion of the book. The first chapter focuses on the month before the lockdown, showing how formalism (xingshi zhuyi 形式主义) perpetuates official culture in China. This results in an obsession with appearance, an image management that in the end led to a delayed response to the outbreak. Chapter 2 looks back onto internet culture in China over the past decade, in conjunction with the change in leadership. It shows how platformisation in China has a distinct logic in which ‘[t]he dialectics of party-line domination and bottom-up practices are intricate’, (p. 38) dampening the contentious landscape of the Chinese internet. Chapter 3 zooms in on the mobilization of resources by the state to implement its policies, including the use of loudspeakers, reminiscent of older times, but also blunt force and the pivotal role played by community","PeriodicalId":42637,"journal":{"name":"Global Media and China","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Book Review: The Wuhan lockdown\",\"authors\":\"Jeroen de Kloet\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/20594364231152317\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"It was in 1919, more than 100 years ago, that the Irish poet W.B. Yeats wrote ‘The second coming’, of which the most quoted lines are probably Things fall apart; the centre cannot hold. Today, a century later, somehow, these words seem to resonate uncomfortably well the times we are living in. War, climate change, geopolitical tensions, a pandemic: life has become saturated with uncertainty and instability. How to make sense of our current times? What task is left for us, academics? In my reading of Guobin Yang’s new book on the Wuhan lockdown, the answer is that we need now – maybe more urgently than before – detailed, empirical, site-specific studies to grasp what is going on. Or, at least, to try our utmost to grasp the current conjuncture. Such works steer away from easy generalisations; instead, they present us with ambivalences, contradictions, if not paradoxes, and as such refuse to give convenient answers. Yang’s study is a well-researched analysis of the Wuhan lockdown, drawing on an elaborate online ethnography that includes diaries, WeChat groups, WeChat moments, news reports, poems, interviews, Sina Weibo postings, policy documents, press conferences, and so on. While circumstances forced such an approach – the author could not enter China for obvious reasons – the result is both an exemplary study of the possibilities of online research methodologies as well as an empirically and theoretically rich account of the starting months of the pandemic. Building on his previous work, Yang convincingly draws on ample case studies to guide us through the start of the pandemic, roughly from December 2019 to April 2020, zooming in on one city, Wuhan. Allow me a very brief, and therefore incomplete, overview of its nine chapters, with some more reflection on the conclusion of the book. The first chapter focuses on the month before the lockdown, showing how formalism (xingshi zhuyi 形式主义) perpetuates official culture in China. This results in an obsession with appearance, an image management that in the end led to a delayed response to the outbreak. Chapter 2 looks back onto internet culture in China over the past decade, in conjunction with the change in leadership. It shows how platformisation in China has a distinct logic in which ‘[t]he dialectics of party-line domination and bottom-up practices are intricate’, (p. 38) dampening the contentious landscape of the Chinese internet. Chapter 3 zooms in on the mobilization of resources by the state to implement its policies, including the use of loudspeakers, reminiscent of older times, but also blunt force and the pivotal role played by community\",\"PeriodicalId\":42637,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global Media and China\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global Media and China\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/20594364231152317\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"COMMUNICATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Media and China","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20594364231152317","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

100多年前的1919年,爱尔兰诗人叶芝(W.B. Yeats)写下了《再来》(the second coming),其中被引用最多的几句话可能是:万物分崩离析;中心站不住了。一个世纪后的今天,不知何故,这些话似乎在我们生活的时代产生了令人不安的共鸣。战争、气候变化、地缘政治紧张局势、流行病:生活充满了不确定性和不稳定性。如何理解我们当前的时代?学者们,留给我们的任务是什么?在我阅读杨国斌关于武汉封锁的新书时,答案是,我们现在——也许比以前更迫切——需要详细的、经验性的、具体地点的研究,以掌握正在发生的事情。或者,至少,尽我们最大的努力把握当前的形势。这样的作品避免了简单的概括;相反,它们呈现给我们的是矛盾、矛盾(如果不是悖论的话),并因此拒绝给出方便的答案。杨的研究是对武汉封锁进行了深入研究的分析,借鉴了一个精心制作的在线民族志,包括日记、微信群、微信朋友圈、新闻报道、诗歌、采访、新浪微博帖子、政策文件、新闻发布会等。虽然环境迫使作者采用这种方法——作者由于显而易见的原因无法进入中国——但其结果既是对在线研究方法可能性的典范研究,也是对大流行开始几个月的经验和理论的丰富描述。在他之前工作的基础上,杨令人信服地利用了大量的案例研究来指导我们度过大流行的开始,大约从2019年12月到2020年4月,放大了一个城市,武汉。请允许我对它的九章作一个非常简短的、因此是不完整的概述,并对本书的结论作一些更多的思考。第一章聚焦于封城前的一个月,展示了形式主义是如何在中国延续官方文化的。这导致了对外表的痴迷,一种形象管理,最终导致了对疫情的反应延迟。第二章回顾了过去十年中国的互联网文化,并结合领导层的变化。它显示了中国的平台化如何具有独特的逻辑,其中“政党路线统治和自下而上实践的辩证法是复杂的”(第38页),抑制了中国互联网的争议景观。第三章聚焦于国家为执行其政策而调动资源,包括使用扩音器,这让人想起旧时代,但也有生硬的力量和社区发挥的关键作用
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Book Review: The Wuhan lockdown
It was in 1919, more than 100 years ago, that the Irish poet W.B. Yeats wrote ‘The second coming’, of which the most quoted lines are probably Things fall apart; the centre cannot hold. Today, a century later, somehow, these words seem to resonate uncomfortably well the times we are living in. War, climate change, geopolitical tensions, a pandemic: life has become saturated with uncertainty and instability. How to make sense of our current times? What task is left for us, academics? In my reading of Guobin Yang’s new book on the Wuhan lockdown, the answer is that we need now – maybe more urgently than before – detailed, empirical, site-specific studies to grasp what is going on. Or, at least, to try our utmost to grasp the current conjuncture. Such works steer away from easy generalisations; instead, they present us with ambivalences, contradictions, if not paradoxes, and as such refuse to give convenient answers. Yang’s study is a well-researched analysis of the Wuhan lockdown, drawing on an elaborate online ethnography that includes diaries, WeChat groups, WeChat moments, news reports, poems, interviews, Sina Weibo postings, policy documents, press conferences, and so on. While circumstances forced such an approach – the author could not enter China for obvious reasons – the result is both an exemplary study of the possibilities of online research methodologies as well as an empirically and theoretically rich account of the starting months of the pandemic. Building on his previous work, Yang convincingly draws on ample case studies to guide us through the start of the pandemic, roughly from December 2019 to April 2020, zooming in on one city, Wuhan. Allow me a very brief, and therefore incomplete, overview of its nine chapters, with some more reflection on the conclusion of the book. The first chapter focuses on the month before the lockdown, showing how formalism (xingshi zhuyi 形式主义) perpetuates official culture in China. This results in an obsession with appearance, an image management that in the end led to a delayed response to the outbreak. Chapter 2 looks back onto internet culture in China over the past decade, in conjunction with the change in leadership. It shows how platformisation in China has a distinct logic in which ‘[t]he dialectics of party-line domination and bottom-up practices are intricate’, (p. 38) dampening the contentious landscape of the Chinese internet. Chapter 3 zooms in on the mobilization of resources by the state to implement its policies, including the use of loudspeakers, reminiscent of older times, but also blunt force and the pivotal role played by community
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Global Media and China
Global Media and China COMMUNICATION-
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
14.30%
发文量
29
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊最新文献
Book Review: Psychophysiological Measurement and Meaning: Cognitive and Emotional Processing of Media Performing fear in television production: Practices of an illiberal democracy Analyzing drivers of attitudes toward machine video news: A Xinhua Zhiyun case study The history of Huawei in Italy through the lens of corporate nationality The gilded cage: Technology, Development, and State Capitalism in China
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1