金融科技抵押贷款机构能否填补信贷缺口?来自自然灾害的证据

Linda Allen, Y. Shan, Yaokan Shen
{"title":"金融科技抵押贷款机构能否填补信贷缺口?来自自然灾害的证据","authors":"Linda Allen, Y. Shan, Yaokan Shen","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3625325","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"After exogenous shocks caused by natural disasters, FinTech lenders satisfy the surge in demand for reconstruction mortgages more than traditional banks and non-FinTech shadow banks. Although both FinTech and traditional bank lenders increase mortgage availability, FinTech lenders relax underwriting standards without raising interest rates or delinquency rates. Comparing lending supply channels, traditional banks respond to regulatory incentives to lend to damaged areas, whereas FinTech lenders exploit bank reliance on balance sheet lending to expand supply. FinTech lenders relax underwriting standards when under competitive pressure from traditional banks, but traditional banks do not use underwriting standards to compete with FinTech lenders.","PeriodicalId":21047,"journal":{"name":"Real Estate eJournal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Do FinTech Mortgage Lenders Fill the Credit Gap? Evidence from Natural Disasters\",\"authors\":\"Linda Allen, Y. Shan, Yaokan Shen\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3625325\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"After exogenous shocks caused by natural disasters, FinTech lenders satisfy the surge in demand for reconstruction mortgages more than traditional banks and non-FinTech shadow banks. Although both FinTech and traditional bank lenders increase mortgage availability, FinTech lenders relax underwriting standards without raising interest rates or delinquency rates. Comparing lending supply channels, traditional banks respond to regulatory incentives to lend to damaged areas, whereas FinTech lenders exploit bank reliance on balance sheet lending to expand supply. FinTech lenders relax underwriting standards when under competitive pressure from traditional banks, but traditional banks do not use underwriting standards to compete with FinTech lenders.\",\"PeriodicalId\":21047,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Real Estate eJournal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-06-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Real Estate eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3625325\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Real Estate eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3625325","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

摘要

在自然灾害造成的外生冲击之后,金融科技贷款机构比传统银行和非金融科技影子银行更能满足激增的重建抵押贷款需求。尽管金融科技和传统银行贷款机构都增加了抵押贷款的可用性,但金融科技贷款机构在不提高利率或拖欠率的情况下放宽了承销标准。与贷款供应渠道相比,传统银行会根据监管激励向受损地区放贷,而金融科技贷款机构则利用银行对资产负债表贷款的依赖来扩大供应。在传统银行的竞争压力下,金融科技贷款机构放宽了承销标准,但传统银行并不使用承销标准与金融科技贷款机构竞争。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Do FinTech Mortgage Lenders Fill the Credit Gap? Evidence from Natural Disasters
After exogenous shocks caused by natural disasters, FinTech lenders satisfy the surge in demand for reconstruction mortgages more than traditional banks and non-FinTech shadow banks. Although both FinTech and traditional bank lenders increase mortgage availability, FinTech lenders relax underwriting standards without raising interest rates or delinquency rates. Comparing lending supply channels, traditional banks respond to regulatory incentives to lend to damaged areas, whereas FinTech lenders exploit bank reliance on balance sheet lending to expand supply. FinTech lenders relax underwriting standards when under competitive pressure from traditional banks, but traditional banks do not use underwriting standards to compete with FinTech lenders.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Financial Cycles Across G7 Economies: A View from Wavelet Analysis Assessing Lithuanian housing market for bubble Household Income, Asset Location and Real Estate Value: Evidence from REITs Household Debt and Labour Supply Decomposing Industry Leverage in the U.S.: the REIT Debt Puzzle
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1