低估儿童自行车车把刺穿伤的后果。

Carmen T. Ramos-Irizarry, Shakeva Swain, Samantha Troncoso-Munoz, Malvina Duncan
{"title":"低估儿童自行车车把刺穿伤的后果。","authors":"Carmen T. Ramos-Irizarry, Shakeva Swain, Samantha Troncoso-Munoz, Malvina Duncan","doi":"10.1097/JTN.0000000000000258","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Impalement bicycle handlebar trauma injuries are rare; however, on initial assessment, they have the potential of being underestimated. We reviewed our prospective trauma database of 3,894 patients for all bicycle injuries from January 2010 to May 2015. Isolated pedal bike injuries were reported in 2.6% (N = 101) of the patients who were admitted to the trauma service. Fifteen patients suffered direct handlebar trauma. Patients were grouped into blunt trauma (n = 12) and impalement trauma (n = 3). We examined gender, age, injury severity score (ISS), Glasgow Coma Scale score, use of protective devices, need for surgical intervention, need for intensive care (ICU), and hospital length of stay. Mean age was 9.6 years. All children with penetrating injuries were males. Mean ISS was less than 9 in both groups. None of the children were wearing bicycle helmets. Three patients who sustained blunt injuries required ICU care due to associated injuries. All of the children with impalement injuries required several surgical interventions. These injuries included a traumatic direct inguinal hernia, a medial groin and thigh laceration with resultant femoral hernia, and a lateral deep thigh laceration. Impalement bicycle handlebar injuries must be thoroughly evaluated, with a similar importance given to blunt injuries. A high index of suspicion must be maintained when examining children with handlebar impalement injuries, as they are at risk for missed or underestimation of their injuries.","PeriodicalId":79423,"journal":{"name":"STN's journal of trauma nursing : the official journal of the Society of Trauma Nurses","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Consequences of Underestimating Impalement Bicycle Handlebar Injuries in Children.\",\"authors\":\"Carmen T. Ramos-Irizarry, Shakeva Swain, Samantha Troncoso-Munoz, Malvina Duncan\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/JTN.0000000000000258\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Impalement bicycle handlebar trauma injuries are rare; however, on initial assessment, they have the potential of being underestimated. We reviewed our prospective trauma database of 3,894 patients for all bicycle injuries from January 2010 to May 2015. Isolated pedal bike injuries were reported in 2.6% (N = 101) of the patients who were admitted to the trauma service. Fifteen patients suffered direct handlebar trauma. Patients were grouped into blunt trauma (n = 12) and impalement trauma (n = 3). We examined gender, age, injury severity score (ISS), Glasgow Coma Scale score, use of protective devices, need for surgical intervention, need for intensive care (ICU), and hospital length of stay. Mean age was 9.6 years. All children with penetrating injuries were males. Mean ISS was less than 9 in both groups. None of the children were wearing bicycle helmets. Three patients who sustained blunt injuries required ICU care due to associated injuries. All of the children with impalement injuries required several surgical interventions. These injuries included a traumatic direct inguinal hernia, a medial groin and thigh laceration with resultant femoral hernia, and a lateral deep thigh laceration. Impalement bicycle handlebar injuries must be thoroughly evaluated, with a similar importance given to blunt injuries. A high index of suspicion must be maintained when examining children with handlebar impalement injuries, as they are at risk for missed or underestimation of their injuries.\",\"PeriodicalId\":79423,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"STN's journal of trauma nursing : the official journal of the Society of Trauma Nurses\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"STN's journal of trauma nursing : the official journal of the Society of Trauma Nurses\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/JTN.0000000000000258\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"STN's journal of trauma nursing : the official journal of the Society of Trauma Nurses","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JTN.0000000000000258","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

刺穿自行车车把外伤少见;然而,根据初步评估,它们有可能被低估。我们回顾了2010年1月至2015年5月3,894例自行车损伤患者的前瞻性创伤数据库。在接受创伤服务的患者中,有2.6% (N = 101)报告了孤立的脚踏自行车损伤。15例患者直接受到车把损伤。患者被分为钝性创伤(n = 12)和穿刺创伤(n = 3)。我们检查了性别、年龄、损伤严重程度评分(ISS)、格拉斯哥昏迷量表评分、使用保护装置、是否需要手术干预、是否需要重症监护(ICU)和住院时间。平均年龄9.6岁。所有穿透伤儿童均为男性。两组平均ISS均小于9。孩子们都没有戴自行车头盔。3例钝性损伤患者因相关损伤需要ICU护理。所有有穿刺伤的儿童都需要多次手术干预。这些损伤包括外伤性腹股沟直接疝,腹股沟内侧和大腿撕裂伤合并股疝,以及外侧大腿深撕裂伤。刺穿自行车车把损伤必须彻底评估,与钝器损伤同样重要。在检查有车把刺穿伤的儿童时,必须保持高度的怀疑,因为他们有被遗漏或低估伤害的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Consequences of Underestimating Impalement Bicycle Handlebar Injuries in Children.
Impalement bicycle handlebar trauma injuries are rare; however, on initial assessment, they have the potential of being underestimated. We reviewed our prospective trauma database of 3,894 patients for all bicycle injuries from January 2010 to May 2015. Isolated pedal bike injuries were reported in 2.6% (N = 101) of the patients who were admitted to the trauma service. Fifteen patients suffered direct handlebar trauma. Patients were grouped into blunt trauma (n = 12) and impalement trauma (n = 3). We examined gender, age, injury severity score (ISS), Glasgow Coma Scale score, use of protective devices, need for surgical intervention, need for intensive care (ICU), and hospital length of stay. Mean age was 9.6 years. All children with penetrating injuries were males. Mean ISS was less than 9 in both groups. None of the children were wearing bicycle helmets. Three patients who sustained blunt injuries required ICU care due to associated injuries. All of the children with impalement injuries required several surgical interventions. These injuries included a traumatic direct inguinal hernia, a medial groin and thigh laceration with resultant femoral hernia, and a lateral deep thigh laceration. Impalement bicycle handlebar injuries must be thoroughly evaluated, with a similar importance given to blunt injuries. A high index of suspicion must be maintained when examining children with handlebar impalement injuries, as they are at risk for missed or underestimation of their injuries.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Sanguine. A Dream Come True. Implementation of a Novel Home Visiting Nurse Pilot Program for Victims of Violent Penetrating Injury. Geriatric Falls: A Registry-Based Study in the Netherlands. Showing Up for Trauma-Advocacy Versus Lobbying for the Trauma Nurse.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1