安全法案:受益人去世后的退休计划分配

IF 0.9 Q2 LAW EJournal of Tax Research Pub Date : 2020-11-28 DOI:10.2139/ssrn.3739180
Vorris J. Blankenship
{"title":"安全法案:受益人去世后的退休计划分配","authors":"Vorris J. Blankenship","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3739180","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Setting Every Community Up for Retirement Enhancement Act (SECURE Act) of 2019 made very significant changes to required minimum distributions (RMDs) paid to beneficiaries of defined contribution retirement plans, including IRAs. The Act generally applies to beneficiaries of a defined contribution plans if the plan participant dies after 2019. The most significant provisions of the Act limit RMDs that are life or life expectancy distributions. Life-expectancy RMDs are now available only for eligible designated beneficiaries (EDBs). EDBs are defined as (1) the surviving spouse of a plan participant, (2) a minor child of the participant, (3) a disabled individual, (4) a chronically ill individual, or (5) an individual who is not more than ten years younger than the participant. The Act also replaced the alternative five-year distribution rule with a comparable ten-year rule. Under the new ten-year rule, a plan is required to distribute the participant’s entire benefit before the end of the tenth calendar year after the participant’s death. The Act also generally requires a plan to distribute all the plan’s remaining benefit before the end of the tenth calendar year following the death of an EDB who was receiving distributions over his or her life expectancy. The Act imposes a similar rule on the post-2019 death of a designated beneficiary in a plan that otherwise would not be subject to the Act because the participant died before 2020. These distributions required after the death of an EDB (or a designated beneficiary in a pre-2020 plan) are referred to in this Article as successor ten-year distributions. They are the focus of the Article. A major problem may occur on the death of an EDB in a plan with multiple EDBs. In addition to applying the successor ten-year rule to the benefit of the deceased EDB, the SECURE Act will also generally apply the rule to the interests of the other living EDBs. The underlying theory is that a plan is allowed only one method for payment of RMDs, and the SECURE Act imposes that method upon the death of an EDB. Solutions to the problem of multi-beneficiary plans lie in the ability of a participant or trustee to divide a plan into separate accounts for each beneficiary. If such a separation is timely, the death of an EDB in one separate account should not affect the method or period under which RMDs are being made from the separate accounts of other EDBs. Unfortunately, the separate account solution generally does not work for multiple EDBs who are beneficiaries in a “see-through” trust. The interest of a see-through trust in a plan cannot be divided into separate accounts for trust beneficiaries. Instead, the solution lies in the proper creation of separate subtrusts for each beneficiary that insulate the plan interests of living EDBs from the successor ten-year rule applicable to the interest of a deceased EDB. Note though that, in some unique circumstances, a special type of trust allowed by the SECURE Act, an “applicable multi-beneficiary trust” (AMBT) may provide a more convenient way to divide a trust into separate subtrusts. Similar solutions that limit the effect of the successor ten-year rule may also be available for designated beneficiaries in a pre-2020 plan that is otherwise not subject to the SECURE Act.","PeriodicalId":54058,"journal":{"name":"EJournal of Tax Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The SECURE Act: Retirement Plan Distributions after the Death of a Beneficiary\",\"authors\":\"Vorris J. Blankenship\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3739180\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The Setting Every Community Up for Retirement Enhancement Act (SECURE Act) of 2019 made very significant changes to required minimum distributions (RMDs) paid to beneficiaries of defined contribution retirement plans, including IRAs. The Act generally applies to beneficiaries of a defined contribution plans if the plan participant dies after 2019. The most significant provisions of the Act limit RMDs that are life or life expectancy distributions. Life-expectancy RMDs are now available only for eligible designated beneficiaries (EDBs). EDBs are defined as (1) the surviving spouse of a plan participant, (2) a minor child of the participant, (3) a disabled individual, (4) a chronically ill individual, or (5) an individual who is not more than ten years younger than the participant. The Act also replaced the alternative five-year distribution rule with a comparable ten-year rule. Under the new ten-year rule, a plan is required to distribute the participant’s entire benefit before the end of the tenth calendar year after the participant’s death. The Act also generally requires a plan to distribute all the plan’s remaining benefit before the end of the tenth calendar year following the death of an EDB who was receiving distributions over his or her life expectancy. The Act imposes a similar rule on the post-2019 death of a designated beneficiary in a plan that otherwise would not be subject to the Act because the participant died before 2020. These distributions required after the death of an EDB (or a designated beneficiary in a pre-2020 plan) are referred to in this Article as successor ten-year distributions. They are the focus of the Article. A major problem may occur on the death of an EDB in a plan with multiple EDBs. In addition to applying the successor ten-year rule to the benefit of the deceased EDB, the SECURE Act will also generally apply the rule to the interests of the other living EDBs. The underlying theory is that a plan is allowed only one method for payment of RMDs, and the SECURE Act imposes that method upon the death of an EDB. Solutions to the problem of multi-beneficiary plans lie in the ability of a participant or trustee to divide a plan into separate accounts for each beneficiary. If such a separation is timely, the death of an EDB in one separate account should not affect the method or period under which RMDs are being made from the separate accounts of other EDBs. Unfortunately, the separate account solution generally does not work for multiple EDBs who are beneficiaries in a “see-through” trust. The interest of a see-through trust in a plan cannot be divided into separate accounts for trust beneficiaries. Instead, the solution lies in the proper creation of separate subtrusts for each beneficiary that insulate the plan interests of living EDBs from the successor ten-year rule applicable to the interest of a deceased EDB. Note though that, in some unique circumstances, a special type of trust allowed by the SECURE Act, an “applicable multi-beneficiary trust” (AMBT) may provide a more convenient way to divide a trust into separate subtrusts. Similar solutions that limit the effect of the successor ten-year rule may also be available for designated beneficiaries in a pre-2020 plan that is otherwise not subject to the SECURE Act.\",\"PeriodicalId\":54058,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"EJournal of Tax Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-11-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"EJournal of Tax Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3739180\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EJournal of Tax Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3739180","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

2019年的《建立每个社区退休增强法案》(SECURE Act)对支付给包括ira在内的固定缴款退休计划受益人的最低分配额(rmd)进行了非常重大的修改。该法案通常适用于固定缴款计划的受益人,如果计划参与者在2019年之后去世。该法案最重要的条款限制rmd,即寿命或预期寿命分布。预期寿命rmd现在只适用于符合条件的指定受益人(edb)。edb的定义为(1)计划参与者的未亡配偶,(2)参与者的未成年子女,(3)残疾人士,(4)长期病患者,或(5)比参与者小不超过10岁的个人。该法案还以可比的十年分配规则取代了可选的五年分配规则。根据新的十年规则,计划必须在参与人死亡后的第10个日历年结束之前分配参与人的全部养恤金。该法案还一般要求在领取超过其预期寿命的补助金的教育局雇员死亡后的第10个日历年结束之前,制定一项计划,分配该计划的所有剩余补助金。该法案对计划中指定受益人在2019年之后死亡的情况也规定了类似的规则,否则由于参与者在2020年之前死亡,该计划将不受该法案的约束。在EDB(或2020年前计划中的指定受益人)去世后所需的分配在本条中称为后续十年分配。它们是本文的重点。在包含多个EDB的计划中,如果一个EDB死亡,可能会出现重大问题。除了将继承十年规则适用于已故的教育局之外,《安全法案》通常也将该规则适用于其他在世的教育局的利益。潜在的理论是,一个计划只允许一种支付rmd的方法,而《安全法案》规定,在EDB去世时,这种方法是有效的。多受益人计划问题的解决方案在于参与者或受托人能够为每个受益人将计划划分为单独的账户。如上述分拆是适时的,在一个单独帐目内的某一教育局的死亡,不应影响从其他教育局的单独帐目作出rmd的方法或期间。不幸的是,独立账户解决方案通常不适用于作为“透明”信托受益人的多个edb。透明信托在计划中的权益,不得为信托受益人单独划分账户。相反,解决方案在于为每个受益人适当地创建单独的子信托,将在世的EDB的计划权益与适用于已故EDB权益的继承十年规则隔离开来。但请注意,在某些特殊情况下,《安全法案》允许的一种特殊类型的信托,“适用的多受益人信托”(AMBT)可能提供一种更方便的方式,将信托划分为单独的子信托。限制后续十年规则影响的类似解决方案也可能适用于2020年前计划的指定受益人,否则不受《安全法案》的约束。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The SECURE Act: Retirement Plan Distributions after the Death of a Beneficiary
The Setting Every Community Up for Retirement Enhancement Act (SECURE Act) of 2019 made very significant changes to required minimum distributions (RMDs) paid to beneficiaries of defined contribution retirement plans, including IRAs. The Act generally applies to beneficiaries of a defined contribution plans if the plan participant dies after 2019. The most significant provisions of the Act limit RMDs that are life or life expectancy distributions. Life-expectancy RMDs are now available only for eligible designated beneficiaries (EDBs). EDBs are defined as (1) the surviving spouse of a plan participant, (2) a minor child of the participant, (3) a disabled individual, (4) a chronically ill individual, or (5) an individual who is not more than ten years younger than the participant. The Act also replaced the alternative five-year distribution rule with a comparable ten-year rule. Under the new ten-year rule, a plan is required to distribute the participant’s entire benefit before the end of the tenth calendar year after the participant’s death. The Act also generally requires a plan to distribute all the plan’s remaining benefit before the end of the tenth calendar year following the death of an EDB who was receiving distributions over his or her life expectancy. The Act imposes a similar rule on the post-2019 death of a designated beneficiary in a plan that otherwise would not be subject to the Act because the participant died before 2020. These distributions required after the death of an EDB (or a designated beneficiary in a pre-2020 plan) are referred to in this Article as successor ten-year distributions. They are the focus of the Article. A major problem may occur on the death of an EDB in a plan with multiple EDBs. In addition to applying the successor ten-year rule to the benefit of the deceased EDB, the SECURE Act will also generally apply the rule to the interests of the other living EDBs. The underlying theory is that a plan is allowed only one method for payment of RMDs, and the SECURE Act imposes that method upon the death of an EDB. Solutions to the problem of multi-beneficiary plans lie in the ability of a participant or trustee to divide a plan into separate accounts for each beneficiary. If such a separation is timely, the death of an EDB in one separate account should not affect the method or period under which RMDs are being made from the separate accounts of other EDBs. Unfortunately, the separate account solution generally does not work for multiple EDBs who are beneficiaries in a “see-through” trust. The interest of a see-through trust in a plan cannot be divided into separate accounts for trust beneficiaries. Instead, the solution lies in the proper creation of separate subtrusts for each beneficiary that insulate the plan interests of living EDBs from the successor ten-year rule applicable to the interest of a deceased EDB. Note though that, in some unique circumstances, a special type of trust allowed by the SECURE Act, an “applicable multi-beneficiary trust” (AMBT) may provide a more convenient way to divide a trust into separate subtrusts. Similar solutions that limit the effect of the successor ten-year rule may also be available for designated beneficiaries in a pre-2020 plan that is otherwise not subject to the SECURE Act.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Democracy Avoidance in Tax Lawmaking Recent Administrative and Judicial Developments in IRS Appeals Policy Forum: Promoting Tax Compliance by Regulating the Digital Economy - Quebec's Uber Initiative Supporting Small Businesses in Place Thinking Like a Source State in a Digital Economy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1