亨特地区:一家社区医院在技术创新方面处于领先地位

{"title":"亨特地区:一家社区医院在技术创新方面处于领先地位","authors":"","doi":"10.1097/01.ORN.0000429405.68531.11","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AA patient presents at the hospital for his scheduled abdominal surgery: A resection of the colon. A surgical time out is conducted, general anesthesia is administered, and the patient is intubated and placed on a mechanical ventilator. Sponges are counted by the circulating RN and the scrub person. The surgeon makes an incision, and blood vessels are clamped. The surgery progresses normally but extends through a shift change for the scrub person. At the arrival of the second shift, sudden blood loss occurs, and packs of sponges are rapidly counted into the surgery. As the surgeons focus on identifying the cause of the blood loss, the nurses are also called to order backup blood supply. Once a clamp malfunction is identified, surgery proceeds and is completed. The surgeon is ready for close and is already suturing the patient’s incision. The only problem now is an unreconciled sponge count. The surgery resulted in twice the normal number of sponges, and one is missing. Where is it? Deep within the patient’s abdominal cavity? Was it discarded with the linens? Was the sponge count incorrect? Conducting another count yields the same result. How does the staff know that the in-count was correct? Isn’t that the responsibility of the earlier shift? An X-ray to rule out sponge location in the patient’s abdomen is ordered. While waiting for an update from the radiology department, the nurses search the surgical area, the trash, and the kick-bucket for the missing sponge. Every minute the surgical site stays open is an increased infection risk. The surgeon is aware of this and presses the nurses to call the radiology department again. Due to the blood loss complications, the OR schedule is already off by half an hour. The surgeon and nurses know that OR delays will be brought up by hospital administration during the next OR efficiency meeting. With healthcare costs rising and the added pressures of healthcare reform, every extra minute used in the OR is under scrutiny. The X-ray doesn’t show a sponge. Staff members are confident that the radio-opaque thread would have appeared if the sponge was inside the patient, so the patient is sutured and heals normally. Because the patient doesn’t present to the hospital again with infection or other complications, it’s determined that the sponge wasn’t in the body, but it’s never found. The surgical team discusses the incident at the next patient safety meeting. The question remains: What can be done about this problem?","PeriodicalId":76746,"journal":{"name":"Today's OR nurse","volume":"22 4 1","pages":"1–4"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Hunt Regional: A community hospital leads the way in technological innovation\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/01.ORN.0000429405.68531.11\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"AA patient presents at the hospital for his scheduled abdominal surgery: A resection of the colon. A surgical time out is conducted, general anesthesia is administered, and the patient is intubated and placed on a mechanical ventilator. Sponges are counted by the circulating RN and the scrub person. The surgeon makes an incision, and blood vessels are clamped. The surgery progresses normally but extends through a shift change for the scrub person. At the arrival of the second shift, sudden blood loss occurs, and packs of sponges are rapidly counted into the surgery. As the surgeons focus on identifying the cause of the blood loss, the nurses are also called to order backup blood supply. Once a clamp malfunction is identified, surgery proceeds and is completed. The surgeon is ready for close and is already suturing the patient’s incision. The only problem now is an unreconciled sponge count. The surgery resulted in twice the normal number of sponges, and one is missing. Where is it? Deep within the patient’s abdominal cavity? Was it discarded with the linens? Was the sponge count incorrect? Conducting another count yields the same result. How does the staff know that the in-count was correct? Isn’t that the responsibility of the earlier shift? An X-ray to rule out sponge location in the patient’s abdomen is ordered. While waiting for an update from the radiology department, the nurses search the surgical area, the trash, and the kick-bucket for the missing sponge. Every minute the surgical site stays open is an increased infection risk. The surgeon is aware of this and presses the nurses to call the radiology department again. Due to the blood loss complications, the OR schedule is already off by half an hour. The surgeon and nurses know that OR delays will be brought up by hospital administration during the next OR efficiency meeting. With healthcare costs rising and the added pressures of healthcare reform, every extra minute used in the OR is under scrutiny. The X-ray doesn’t show a sponge. Staff members are confident that the radio-opaque thread would have appeared if the sponge was inside the patient, so the patient is sutured and heals normally. Because the patient doesn’t present to the hospital again with infection or other complications, it’s determined that the sponge wasn’t in the body, but it’s never found. The surgical team discusses the incident at the next patient safety meeting. The question remains: What can be done about this problem?\",\"PeriodicalId\":76746,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Today's OR nurse\",\"volume\":\"22 4 1\",\"pages\":\"1–4\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-05-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Today's OR nurse\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ORN.0000429405.68531.11\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Today's OR nurse","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ORN.0000429405.68531.11","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

一位病人来到医院接受腹部手术:结肠切除术。手术暂停,全身麻醉,患者插管并使用机械呼吸机。海绵由循环注册护士和擦洗员进行计数。外科医生切开一个切口,夹住血管。手术正常进行,但会因手术人员换班而延长。在第二班到来的时候,突然发生失血,一包的海绵很快就被计算到手术中。当外科医生集中精力查明失血的原因时,护士们也被要求订购备用血液供应。一旦确定钳位故障,手术进行并完成。外科医生已经做好缝合的准备,并且已经在缝合病人的切口。现在唯一的问题是不一致的海绵数量。手术产生的海绵是正常数量的两倍,而且少了一块。它在哪里?在病人腹腔深处?它和床单一起被丢弃了吗?是海绵数错了吗?进行另一次计数得到相同的结果。员工如何知道入账是正确的?这不是上早班的责任吗?要求进行x光检查以排除海绵在患者腹部的位置。在等待放射科的最新消息时,护士们在手术区、垃圾桶和水桶里寻找丢失的海绵。手术部位开放的每一分钟都增加了感染的风险。外科医生意识到了这一点,催促护士再给放射科打电话。由于失血并发症,手术时间已经推迟了半小时。外科医生和护士知道,在下次手术室效率会议上,医院管理部门会提出手术室延误的问题。随着医疗成本的上升和医疗改革的压力增加,在手术室里使用的每一分钟都受到严格审查。x光片没有显示海绵。工作人员相信,如果海绵在病人体内,就会出现不透明的线,所以病人会被缝合并正常愈合。由于患者没有再次出现感染或其他并发症,因此确定海绵不在体内,但从未找到过。手术小组在下次患者安全会议上讨论了这一事件。问题仍然是:对于这个问题我们能做些什么?
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Hunt Regional: A community hospital leads the way in technological innovation
AA patient presents at the hospital for his scheduled abdominal surgery: A resection of the colon. A surgical time out is conducted, general anesthesia is administered, and the patient is intubated and placed on a mechanical ventilator. Sponges are counted by the circulating RN and the scrub person. The surgeon makes an incision, and blood vessels are clamped. The surgery progresses normally but extends through a shift change for the scrub person. At the arrival of the second shift, sudden blood loss occurs, and packs of sponges are rapidly counted into the surgery. As the surgeons focus on identifying the cause of the blood loss, the nurses are also called to order backup blood supply. Once a clamp malfunction is identified, surgery proceeds and is completed. The surgeon is ready for close and is already suturing the patient’s incision. The only problem now is an unreconciled sponge count. The surgery resulted in twice the normal number of sponges, and one is missing. Where is it? Deep within the patient’s abdominal cavity? Was it discarded with the linens? Was the sponge count incorrect? Conducting another count yields the same result. How does the staff know that the in-count was correct? Isn’t that the responsibility of the earlier shift? An X-ray to rule out sponge location in the patient’s abdomen is ordered. While waiting for an update from the radiology department, the nurses search the surgical area, the trash, and the kick-bucket for the missing sponge. Every minute the surgical site stays open is an increased infection risk. The surgeon is aware of this and presses the nurses to call the radiology department again. Due to the blood loss complications, the OR schedule is already off by half an hour. The surgeon and nurses know that OR delays will be brought up by hospital administration during the next OR efficiency meeting. With healthcare costs rising and the added pressures of healthcare reform, every extra minute used in the OR is under scrutiny. The X-ray doesn’t show a sponge. Staff members are confident that the radio-opaque thread would have appeared if the sponge was inside the patient, so the patient is sutured and heals normally. Because the patient doesn’t present to the hospital again with infection or other complications, it’s determined that the sponge wasn’t in the body, but it’s never found. The surgical team discusses the incident at the next patient safety meeting. The question remains: What can be done about this problem?
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Implementing enhanced recovery after surgery Having the fire safety talk Avoiding surgical site infections in neurosurgical procedures Complications of perioperative hypothermia: The temperature of I.V. fluids and the OR can lead to hypothermia An innovative case management: Gatekeeper model for Medicare surgeries
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1