谁在收盘时交易?对价格发现和流动性的影响

Vincent Bogousslavsky, Dmitriy Muravyev
{"title":"谁在收盘时交易?对价格发现和流动性的影响","authors":"Vincent Bogousslavsky, Dmitriy Muravyev","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3485840","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Closing auctions set daily closing prices for U.S. stocks and account for a striking 7.5% of daily volume in 2018, up from 3.1% in 2010. We study the causes and implications of this major trend. Difference-in-difference analyses suggest that closing volume is fueled directly and indirectly by the growth of indexing and ETFs. Auctions usually match large volume cheaply. However, we identify several concerns. The auction price almost never settles within the bid-ask spread, mostly due to the binding tick size. Auction price deviations revert quickly and completely. Finally, as trading migrates to the close, liquidity at the open worsens.","PeriodicalId":18611,"journal":{"name":"Microeconomics: General Equilibrium & Disequilibrium Models of Financial Markets eJournal","volume":"18 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Who Trades at the Close? Implications for Price Discovery and Liquidity\",\"authors\":\"Vincent Bogousslavsky, Dmitriy Muravyev\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3485840\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Closing auctions set daily closing prices for U.S. stocks and account for a striking 7.5% of daily volume in 2018, up from 3.1% in 2010. We study the causes and implications of this major trend. Difference-in-difference analyses suggest that closing volume is fueled directly and indirectly by the growth of indexing and ETFs. Auctions usually match large volume cheaply. However, we identify several concerns. The auction price almost never settles within the bid-ask spread, mostly due to the binding tick size. Auction price deviations revert quickly and completely. Finally, as trading migrates to the close, liquidity at the open worsens.\",\"PeriodicalId\":18611,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Microeconomics: General Equilibrium & Disequilibrium Models of Financial Markets eJournal\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Microeconomics: General Equilibrium & Disequilibrium Models of Financial Markets eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3485840\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Microeconomics: General Equilibrium & Disequilibrium Models of Financial Markets eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3485840","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

收盘拍卖决定了美国股市的每日收盘价,占2018年日交易量的7.5%,高于2010年的3.1%。我们研究这一主要趋势的原因和影响。差异分析表明,指数和etf的增长直接或间接推动了收盘成交量。拍卖通常以低廉的价格匹配大宗交易。然而,我们确定了几个问题。拍卖价格几乎从未在买卖价差内结算,这主要是由于具有约束力的波动幅度。拍卖价格偏差恢复迅速和完全。最后,随着交易转向收盘,开盘时的流动性恶化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Who Trades at the Close? Implications for Price Discovery and Liquidity
Closing auctions set daily closing prices for U.S. stocks and account for a striking 7.5% of daily volume in 2018, up from 3.1% in 2010. We study the causes and implications of this major trend. Difference-in-difference analyses suggest that closing volume is fueled directly and indirectly by the growth of indexing and ETFs. Auctions usually match large volume cheaply. However, we identify several concerns. The auction price almost never settles within the bid-ask spread, mostly due to the binding tick size. Auction price deviations revert quickly and completely. Finally, as trading migrates to the close, liquidity at the open worsens.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Framework for Investing with Altruism The Inviolable Law of Demand How Much Does the Market Know? Who Trades at the Close? Implications for Price Discovery and Liquidity Trade and the Rise of Ancient Greek City-States
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1