{"title":"独占版权的理想分享:乌托邦还是现实?","authors":"N. V. Shcherbak","doi":"10.24031/1992-2043-2021-21-5-166-192","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article discusses the problem of allocating ideal shares in exclusive copyright. The legal and dogmatic design of exclusive rights allows you to establish not only a joint, but also share right and this is fully consistent with the stimulating function of exclusive rights. The paper analyzes various theoretical models of exclusive right, and concludes that the lack of ideal shares in exclusive right becomes a stumbling block for commercializing the results of intellectual activity and leads to paralysis of civil turnover.","PeriodicalId":35992,"journal":{"name":"Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review","volume":"210 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"IDEAL SHARE IN EXCLUSIVE COPYRIGHT: UTOPIA OR REALITY?\",\"authors\":\"N. V. Shcherbak\",\"doi\":\"10.24031/1992-2043-2021-21-5-166-192\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The article discusses the problem of allocating ideal shares in exclusive copyright. The legal and dogmatic design of exclusive rights allows you to establish not only a joint, but also share right and this is fully consistent with the stimulating function of exclusive rights. The paper analyzes various theoretical models of exclusive right, and concludes that the lack of ideal shares in exclusive right becomes a stumbling block for commercializing the results of intellectual activity and leads to paralysis of civil turnover.\",\"PeriodicalId\":35992,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review\",\"volume\":\"210 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24031/1992-2043-2021-21-5-166-192\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24031/1992-2043-2021-21-5-166-192","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
IDEAL SHARE IN EXCLUSIVE COPYRIGHT: UTOPIA OR REALITY?
The article discusses the problem of allocating ideal shares in exclusive copyright. The legal and dogmatic design of exclusive rights allows you to establish not only a joint, but also share right and this is fully consistent with the stimulating function of exclusive rights. The paper analyzes various theoretical models of exclusive right, and concludes that the lack of ideal shares in exclusive right becomes a stumbling block for commercializing the results of intellectual activity and leads to paralysis of civil turnover.
期刊介绍：
The Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review (CR-CL) is the nation’s leading progressive law journal. Founded in 1966 as an instrument to advance personal freedoms and human dignities, CR-CL seeks to catalyze progressive thought and dialogue through publishing innovative legal scholarship and from various perspectives and in diverse fields of study.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
