鹰嘴豆品种对绿蛾的抗性研究(鳞翅目:夜蛾科)

IF 1.2 4区 农林科学 Q3 AGRONOMY Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy. Pub Date : 2022-05-24 DOI:10.4025/actasciagron.v44i1.54619
Célio Borella Júnior, F. Corrêa, Anderson Rodrigo da Silva, A. Siqueira, W. M. Nascimento, A. C. S. Almeida, F. G. Jesus
{"title":"鹰嘴豆品种对绿蛾的抗性研究(鳞翅目:夜蛾科)","authors":"Célio Borella Júnior, F. Corrêa, Anderson Rodrigo da Silva, A. Siqueira, W. M. Nascimento, A. C. S. Almeida, F. G. Jesus","doi":"10.4025/actasciagron.v44i1.54619","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Chickpea is a legume with nutrient-rich grains important for human feeding. Tobacco budworm, Chloridea virescens (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae), is one of the most major pests of chickpea (Cicer arietinum) in Brazil. This pest damages leaves, flowers, pods, and grains. Plant resistance to insects is an important tactic of pest management, which usually facilitates and reduce costs of implementing an Integrated Pest Management for farmers. Thus, this study aimed to evaluate the resistance in chickpea cultivars to C. virescens. Six chickpea cultivars were evaluated for antixenosis, initial antibiotic parameters, and behavior under field conditions. The cultivars BRS Kalifa and BRS Cícero were less attractive in a free-choice test, while Jamu 96 and BRS Kalifa were less attractive in a no-choice test. BRS Kalifa and BRS Toro leaves had a higher trichome density. Jamu 96 and BRS Toro had higher contents of oxalic and malic acids. C. virescens larvae in BRS Cícero, BRS Toro, and BRS Kalifa showed the lowest weights. Jamu 96 pods were the least damaged, and BRS Aleppo and Jamu 96 had the highest yields. The chickpea cultivars Jamu 96 and BRS Aleppo, which had resistance levels and mechanisms, can be used in integrated pest management programs to control C. virescens.","PeriodicalId":56373,"journal":{"name":"Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy.","volume":"20 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Resistance of chickpea cultivars to Chloridea virescens (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae)\",\"authors\":\"Célio Borella Júnior, F. Corrêa, Anderson Rodrigo da Silva, A. Siqueira, W. M. Nascimento, A. C. S. Almeida, F. G. Jesus\",\"doi\":\"10.4025/actasciagron.v44i1.54619\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Chickpea is a legume with nutrient-rich grains important for human feeding. Tobacco budworm, Chloridea virescens (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae), is one of the most major pests of chickpea (Cicer arietinum) in Brazil. This pest damages leaves, flowers, pods, and grains. Plant resistance to insects is an important tactic of pest management, which usually facilitates and reduce costs of implementing an Integrated Pest Management for farmers. Thus, this study aimed to evaluate the resistance in chickpea cultivars to C. virescens. Six chickpea cultivars were evaluated for antixenosis, initial antibiotic parameters, and behavior under field conditions. The cultivars BRS Kalifa and BRS Cícero were less attractive in a free-choice test, while Jamu 96 and BRS Kalifa were less attractive in a no-choice test. BRS Kalifa and BRS Toro leaves had a higher trichome density. Jamu 96 and BRS Toro had higher contents of oxalic and malic acids. C. virescens larvae in BRS Cícero, BRS Toro, and BRS Kalifa showed the lowest weights. Jamu 96 pods were the least damaged, and BRS Aleppo and Jamu 96 had the highest yields. The chickpea cultivars Jamu 96 and BRS Aleppo, which had resistance levels and mechanisms, can be used in integrated pest management programs to control C. virescens.\",\"PeriodicalId\":56373,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy.\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy.\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4025/actasciagron.v44i1.54619\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRONOMY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy.","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4025/actasciagron.v44i1.54619","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

鹰嘴豆是一种富含营养的豆类,对人类的喂养很重要。烟草budworm, Chloridea virescens(鳞翅目:夜蛾科)是巴西鹰嘴豆(Cicer arietinum)的主要害虫之一。这种害虫损害叶子、花、豆荚和谷物。植物抗虫性是病虫害防治的一项重要策略,通常有助于降低农民实施病虫害综合防治的成本。因此,本研究旨在评价鹰嘴豆品种对绿豆病的抗性。对6个鹰嘴豆品种的抗蛇毒、初始抗生素参数和田间条件下的行为进行了评价。品种BRS Kalifa和BRS Cícero在自由选择试验中吸引力较低,而Jamu 96和BRS Kalifa在非选择试验中吸引力较低。BRS Kalifa和BRS Toro叶片毛状体密度较高。Jamu 96和BRS Toro的草酸和苹果酸含量较高。绿纹夜蛾幼虫在BRS Cícero、BRS Toro和BRS Kalifa的体重最低。Jamu 96豆荚受损最少,而BRS Aleppo和Jamu 96的产量最高。鹰嘴豆品种“Jamu 96”和“BRS Aleppo”具有抗性水平和抗性机制,可用于综合防治。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Resistance of chickpea cultivars to Chloridea virescens (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae)
Chickpea is a legume with nutrient-rich grains important for human feeding. Tobacco budworm, Chloridea virescens (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae), is one of the most major pests of chickpea (Cicer arietinum) in Brazil. This pest damages leaves, flowers, pods, and grains. Plant resistance to insects is an important tactic of pest management, which usually facilitates and reduce costs of implementing an Integrated Pest Management for farmers. Thus, this study aimed to evaluate the resistance in chickpea cultivars to C. virescens. Six chickpea cultivars were evaluated for antixenosis, initial antibiotic parameters, and behavior under field conditions. The cultivars BRS Kalifa and BRS Cícero were less attractive in a free-choice test, while Jamu 96 and BRS Kalifa were less attractive in a no-choice test. BRS Kalifa and BRS Toro leaves had a higher trichome density. Jamu 96 and BRS Toro had higher contents of oxalic and malic acids. C. virescens larvae in BRS Cícero, BRS Toro, and BRS Kalifa showed the lowest weights. Jamu 96 pods were the least damaged, and BRS Aleppo and Jamu 96 had the highest yields. The chickpea cultivars Jamu 96 and BRS Aleppo, which had resistance levels and mechanisms, can be used in integrated pest management programs to control C. virescens.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy.
Acta Scientiarum. Agronomy. Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Agronomy and Crop Science
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
45
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal publishes original articles in all areas of Agronomy, including soil sciences, agricultural entomology, soil fertility and manuring, soil physics, physiology of cultivated plants, phytopathology, phyto-health, phytotechny, genesis, morphology and soil classification, management and conservation of soil, integrated management of plant pests, vegetal improvement, agricultural microbiology, agricultural parasitology, production and processing of seeds.
期刊最新文献
A novel fuzzy approach to identify the phenotypic adaptability of common bean lines Genetic improvement of black oats: a scientometric review New evidence for in vitro conservation of nodal segments of the passion fruit ‘UENF Rio Dourado’ (Passiflora edulis Sims) Morphophysiological changes in black pepper under different water supplies Bacillus amyloliquefaciens PKM16 acts as an antagonist of white mold and an inducer of defense enzymes in tomato plants
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1