芒果、香蕉、木瓜混合果皮的质量评价及贮存稳定性

R. Jahan, F. Akter, Abida Hossain, M. Islam, M. Mazumder
{"title":"芒果、香蕉、木瓜混合果皮的质量评价及贮存稳定性","authors":"R. Jahan, F. Akter, Abida Hossain, M. Islam, M. Mazumder","doi":"10.5455/jbau.52077","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aimed to elucidate the formulation and quality evaluation of fruit leather prepared from Mango, Banana and Papaya, and analyzes shelf life of developed samples at different storage conditions. Three samples of fruit leather (F1=50% mango pulp+20% banana pulp+19% papaya pulp, F2= 70% mango pulp+10% banana pulp+9% papaya pulp, F3=60% mango pulp+15% banana pulp+14% papaya pulp) were developed. The analysis of different composition such as moisture, ash, TSS (Total soluble solids), total sugar, acidity, crude fiber and ascorbic acid of all fresh fruit pulps and developed fruit leathers were taken place. The moisture, ash, and total sugar content of fruit leathers were in the range of 10.99 to 11.69%, 1.13-1.36%, and 54.08-55.38%, respectively. The fiber content ranged from 1.13 to 1.5% and sample F2 contained the highest amount (1.50%). The vitamin C content was highest in F2 (17.49 mg/ 100 g), while F3 gave the lowest (7mg/100g). The acidity of F3 was highest (0.21%), followed by F2 (0.16%) and F1 (0.12%). The sensory properties like color, texture, flavor and overall acceptability of mixed fruit leather of sample F2 (mango 70%, banana 10%, papaya 9%) was more acceptable than sample F1 and F3 which indicates mango rich leathers were much better than Papaya and banana rich leathers. The mixed fruit leathers were packed in sealed low-density and high-density polyethylene, and stored both at room temperature (25±1°C) and refrigerated temperature (4±1°C). Products were acceptable up to 4 months of storage and remained better in high-density polyethylene at room temperature than other conditions.","PeriodicalId":15283,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Bangladesh Agricultural University","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quality evaluation and storage stability of mixed fruit leather prepared from mango, banana and papaya\",\"authors\":\"R. Jahan, F. Akter, Abida Hossain, M. Islam, M. Mazumder\",\"doi\":\"10.5455/jbau.52077\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study aimed to elucidate the formulation and quality evaluation of fruit leather prepared from Mango, Banana and Papaya, and analyzes shelf life of developed samples at different storage conditions. Three samples of fruit leather (F1=50% mango pulp+20% banana pulp+19% papaya pulp, F2= 70% mango pulp+10% banana pulp+9% papaya pulp, F3=60% mango pulp+15% banana pulp+14% papaya pulp) were developed. The analysis of different composition such as moisture, ash, TSS (Total soluble solids), total sugar, acidity, crude fiber and ascorbic acid of all fresh fruit pulps and developed fruit leathers were taken place. The moisture, ash, and total sugar content of fruit leathers were in the range of 10.99 to 11.69%, 1.13-1.36%, and 54.08-55.38%, respectively. The fiber content ranged from 1.13 to 1.5% and sample F2 contained the highest amount (1.50%). The vitamin C content was highest in F2 (17.49 mg/ 100 g), while F3 gave the lowest (7mg/100g). The acidity of F3 was highest (0.21%), followed by F2 (0.16%) and F1 (0.12%). The sensory properties like color, texture, flavor and overall acceptability of mixed fruit leather of sample F2 (mango 70%, banana 10%, papaya 9%) was more acceptable than sample F1 and F3 which indicates mango rich leathers were much better than Papaya and banana rich leathers. The mixed fruit leathers were packed in sealed low-density and high-density polyethylene, and stored both at room temperature (25±1°C) and refrigerated temperature (4±1°C). Products were acceptable up to 4 months of storage and remained better in high-density polyethylene at room temperature than other conditions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":15283,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Bangladesh Agricultural University\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Bangladesh Agricultural University\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5455/jbau.52077\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Bangladesh Agricultural University","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5455/jbau.52077","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本研究旨在阐明芒果、香蕉和木瓜果皮的配方和质量评价,并分析开发样品在不同储存条件下的保质期。制备了3种果皮样品(F1=50%芒果浆+20%香蕉浆+19%木瓜浆,F2= 70%芒果浆+10%香蕉浆+9%木瓜浆,F3=60%芒果浆+15%香蕉浆+14%木瓜浆)。对鲜果果肉和成熟果皮的水分、灰分、总可溶性固形物、总糖、酸度、粗纤维和抗坏血酸等成分进行了分析。果皮的水分、灰分和总糖含量分别为10.99 ~ 11.69%、1.13 ~ 1.36%和54.08 ~ 55.38%。纤维含量为1.13% ~ 1.5%,样品F2含量最高(1.50%)。F2的维生素C含量最高(17.49 mg/100g), F3最低(7mg/100g)。酸度最高的是F3(0.21%),其次是F2(0.16%)和F1(0.12%)。样品F2(芒果70%,香蕉10%,木瓜9%)混合果皮的颜色、质地、风味等感官性能和总体可接受度均优于样品F1和样品F3,说明富含芒果的果皮比富含木瓜和香蕉的果皮要好得多。混合果皮采用密封的低密度聚乙烯和高密度聚乙烯包装,室温(25±1℃)和冷藏温度(4±1℃)保存。产品可接受长达4个月的储存,在室温下高密度聚乙烯比在其他条件下保持更好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Quality evaluation and storage stability of mixed fruit leather prepared from mango, banana and papaya
This study aimed to elucidate the formulation and quality evaluation of fruit leather prepared from Mango, Banana and Papaya, and analyzes shelf life of developed samples at different storage conditions. Three samples of fruit leather (F1=50% mango pulp+20% banana pulp+19% papaya pulp, F2= 70% mango pulp+10% banana pulp+9% papaya pulp, F3=60% mango pulp+15% banana pulp+14% papaya pulp) were developed. The analysis of different composition such as moisture, ash, TSS (Total soluble solids), total sugar, acidity, crude fiber and ascorbic acid of all fresh fruit pulps and developed fruit leathers were taken place. The moisture, ash, and total sugar content of fruit leathers were in the range of 10.99 to 11.69%, 1.13-1.36%, and 54.08-55.38%, respectively. The fiber content ranged from 1.13 to 1.5% and sample F2 contained the highest amount (1.50%). The vitamin C content was highest in F2 (17.49 mg/ 100 g), while F3 gave the lowest (7mg/100g). The acidity of F3 was highest (0.21%), followed by F2 (0.16%) and F1 (0.12%). The sensory properties like color, texture, flavor and overall acceptability of mixed fruit leather of sample F2 (mango 70%, banana 10%, papaya 9%) was more acceptable than sample F1 and F3 which indicates mango rich leathers were much better than Papaya and banana rich leathers. The mixed fruit leathers were packed in sealed low-density and high-density polyethylene, and stored both at room temperature (25±1°C) and refrigerated temperature (4±1°C). Products were acceptable up to 4 months of storage and remained better in high-density polyethylene at room temperature than other conditions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Adoption of Innovative Extension Advisory Services for Management of Problematic Soil (Acidic Soil) in Niger State Characterization of wheat genotypes for terminal heat stress tolerance in Bangladesh Use of Urban Open-waterbody to Enhance Fish Production through Cage Culture Evaluation of the allelopathic effect of some cruciferous plants on germination and growth of Johnsongrass Effects of Plasma transfusion on various hematological and biochemical parameters in goats
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1