{"title":"墨西哥的科学娱乐工作坊团体:一个新兴社区的研究","authors":"Miguel García-Guerrero, B. Lewenstein","doi":"10.1080/21548455.2020.1719293","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The main goal for Science Recreation Workshops (SRWs) is to build communities that create meaningful experiences, while participants engage with science in a practical manner. This triggers processes where acting and knowing go hand-in-hand to involve each person as a whole. This requires physical, intellectual and emotional interaction to recreate various science aspects, such as knowledge, history, challenges and controversies. Just as SRWs are collective efforts, as public activities, they are usually promoted by groups as well. But, to the contrary of what happens in SRW with the public, it is common that the group efforts are more geared towards practice than theory. They prioritize working with the public rather than discussing the theoretical and methodological foundations for SRW, or their main challenges as they seek to train new members, evaluate their performance or create new activities. Groups interact with each other, however, this has only led to collaboration on projects rather than to a significant formal discussion. This article focuses specifically on SRW groups in Mexico, as a case study of an emerging community of practice. Data from active organizations were collected in 2009 and 2019, allowing us to compare the situation in these two periods of time and provides perspective on the community’s evolution.","PeriodicalId":45375,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Science Education Part B-Communication and Public Engagement","volume":"16 1","pages":"133 - 148"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2020-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Science recreation workshops groups in Mexico: a study on an emergent community\",\"authors\":\"Miguel García-Guerrero, B. Lewenstein\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/21548455.2020.1719293\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT The main goal for Science Recreation Workshops (SRWs) is to build communities that create meaningful experiences, while participants engage with science in a practical manner. This triggers processes where acting and knowing go hand-in-hand to involve each person as a whole. This requires physical, intellectual and emotional interaction to recreate various science aspects, such as knowledge, history, challenges and controversies. Just as SRWs are collective efforts, as public activities, they are usually promoted by groups as well. But, to the contrary of what happens in SRW with the public, it is common that the group efforts are more geared towards practice than theory. They prioritize working with the public rather than discussing the theoretical and methodological foundations for SRW, or their main challenges as they seek to train new members, evaluate their performance or create new activities. Groups interact with each other, however, this has only led to collaboration on projects rather than to a significant formal discussion. This article focuses specifically on SRW groups in Mexico, as a case study of an emerging community of practice. Data from active organizations were collected in 2009 and 2019, allowing us to compare the situation in these two periods of time and provides perspective on the community’s evolution.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45375,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Science Education Part B-Communication and Public Engagement\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"133 - 148\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-02-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Science Education Part B-Communication and Public Engagement\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/21548455.2020.1719293\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Science Education Part B-Communication and Public Engagement","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21548455.2020.1719293","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
Science recreation workshops groups in Mexico: a study on an emergent community
ABSTRACT The main goal for Science Recreation Workshops (SRWs) is to build communities that create meaningful experiences, while participants engage with science in a practical manner. This triggers processes where acting and knowing go hand-in-hand to involve each person as a whole. This requires physical, intellectual and emotional interaction to recreate various science aspects, such as knowledge, history, challenges and controversies. Just as SRWs are collective efforts, as public activities, they are usually promoted by groups as well. But, to the contrary of what happens in SRW with the public, it is common that the group efforts are more geared towards practice than theory. They prioritize working with the public rather than discussing the theoretical and methodological foundations for SRW, or their main challenges as they seek to train new members, evaluate their performance or create new activities. Groups interact with each other, however, this has only led to collaboration on projects rather than to a significant formal discussion. This article focuses specifically on SRW groups in Mexico, as a case study of an emerging community of practice. Data from active organizations were collected in 2009 and 2019, allowing us to compare the situation in these two periods of time and provides perspective on the community’s evolution.
期刊介绍:
International Journal of Science Education Part B: Communication and Public Engagement will address the communication between and the engagement by individuals and groups concerning evidence-based information about the nature, outcomes, and social consequences, of science and technology. The journal will aim: -To bridge the gap between theory and practice concerning the communication of evidence-based information about the nature, outcomes, and social consequences of science and technology; -To address the perspectives on communication about science and technology of individuals and groups of citizens of all ages, scientists and engineers, media persons, industrialists, policy makers, from countries throughout the world; -To promote rational discourse about the role of communication concerning science and technology in private, social, economic and cultural aspects of life