探讨企业对可持续发展目标的优先排序过程

Sara Kaffashi, D. Grayson
{"title":"探讨企业对可持续发展目标的优先排序过程","authors":"Sara Kaffashi, D. Grayson","doi":"10.47556/j.wjemsd.18.1.2022.4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PURPOSE: This study aims to investigate emergent working practices in terms of how individual businesses determine which SDGs are most relevant to them and therefore which ones to prioritise for their business. DESIGN/METHODOLOGY/APPROACH: A questionnaire-based method was applied to enhance corporate sustainability experts’ opinion on the specific subject of the SDG prioritisation process. FINDINGS: The results of this study suggest that board and CEO involvement in the process of decision-making for SDGs is lacking. Interestingly, the existence of current policies in place to reduce negative impacts together with commercial reasons were found to be the main motivation for prioritisation. In addition, many respondents indicated drawing a materiality matrix for the prioritisation process. Further investigations into the data indicated a lack of active research, ambition, and inaccurate reporting systems on SDGs for many of the studied companies. PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS: The results imply the need for regulatory policies for a quantitative reporting scheme. This will document both negative and positive impacts that can be measured clearly with KPIs, together with their financial implications. Another policy implication is for the government to introduce additional legislation and actively engage with industry to ensure that SDGs that are agreed by the global international community are adequately mandated. ORIGINALITY/VALUE: This study adds to businesses’ wealth of information on SDG prioritisation steps by combining different variables that are significant determinants of the SDG selection process. It also provides an essential piece of CITATION: Kaffashi, S. and Grayson, D. (2022): Exploring the Prioritisation Process of the Sustainable Development Goals by Business. World Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Sustainable Development, Vol. 18, No. 1, pp. 63–85. RECEIVED: 30 October 2020 / REVISED: 14 March 2021 / ACCEPTED: 20 March 2021 / PUBLISHED: 30 October 2021 COPYRIGHT: © 2022 by all the authors of the article above. The article is published as an open access article by WASD under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Exploring the Prioritisation Process of the Sustainable Development Goals by Business WJEMSD V18 N1 2022 © 2022 World Association for Sustainable Development (WASD) 65 information for businesses, sustainability leaders, policy-makers, and broader society to consider “who”, “why” and “how” the SDG prioritisation decisions are being made.","PeriodicalId":45381,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Entrepreneurship Management and Sustainable Development","volume":"18 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring the Prioritisation Process of the Sustainable Development Goals by Business\",\"authors\":\"Sara Kaffashi, D. Grayson\",\"doi\":\"10.47556/j.wjemsd.18.1.2022.4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"PURPOSE: This study aims to investigate emergent working practices in terms of how individual businesses determine which SDGs are most relevant to them and therefore which ones to prioritise for their business. DESIGN/METHODOLOGY/APPROACH: A questionnaire-based method was applied to enhance corporate sustainability experts’ opinion on the specific subject of the SDG prioritisation process. FINDINGS: The results of this study suggest that board and CEO involvement in the process of decision-making for SDGs is lacking. Interestingly, the existence of current policies in place to reduce negative impacts together with commercial reasons were found to be the main motivation for prioritisation. In addition, many respondents indicated drawing a materiality matrix for the prioritisation process. Further investigations into the data indicated a lack of active research, ambition, and inaccurate reporting systems on SDGs for many of the studied companies. PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS: The results imply the need for regulatory policies for a quantitative reporting scheme. This will document both negative and positive impacts that can be measured clearly with KPIs, together with their financial implications. Another policy implication is for the government to introduce additional legislation and actively engage with industry to ensure that SDGs that are agreed by the global international community are adequately mandated. ORIGINALITY/VALUE: This study adds to businesses’ wealth of information on SDG prioritisation steps by combining different variables that are significant determinants of the SDG selection process. It also provides an essential piece of CITATION: Kaffashi, S. and Grayson, D. (2022): Exploring the Prioritisation Process of the Sustainable Development Goals by Business. World Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Sustainable Development, Vol. 18, No. 1, pp. 63–85. RECEIVED: 30 October 2020 / REVISED: 14 March 2021 / ACCEPTED: 20 March 2021 / PUBLISHED: 30 October 2021 COPYRIGHT: © 2022 by all the authors of the article above. The article is published as an open access article by WASD under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Exploring the Prioritisation Process of the Sustainable Development Goals by Business WJEMSD V18 N1 2022 © 2022 World Association for Sustainable Development (WASD) 65 information for businesses, sustainability leaders, policy-makers, and broader society to consider “who”, “why” and “how” the SDG prioritisation decisions are being made.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45381,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"World Journal of Entrepreneurship Management and Sustainable Development\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"World Journal of Entrepreneurship Management and Sustainable Development\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.47556/j.wjemsd.18.1.2022.4\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MANAGEMENT\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Entrepreneurship Management and Sustainable Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47556/j.wjemsd.18.1.2022.4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在调查个别企业如何确定哪些可持续发展目标与他们最相关,从而确定哪些可持续发展目标是他们业务的优先事项。设计/方法/方法:采用基于问卷的方法,以增强企业可持续发展专家对可持续发展目标优先排序过程具体主题的意见。研究结果:本研究结果表明,董事会和CEO在可持续发展目标决策过程中的参与度不足。有趣的是,目前存在的减少负面影响的政策以及商业原因被认为是优先考虑的主要动机。此外,许多答复者表示为优先排序过程绘制重要性矩阵。对数据的进一步调查表明,许多被研究的公司缺乏积极的研究、雄心和不准确的可持续发展目标报告系统。实际意义:研究结果表明需要制定定量报告制度的监管政策。这将记录负面和积极的影响,这些影响可以用kpi清楚地衡量,以及它们的财务影响。另一个政策含义是政府引入额外的立法,并积极与行业合作,以确保全球国际社会商定的可持续发展目标得到充分授权。独创性/价值:本研究结合了可持续发展目标选择过程中重要决定因素的不同变量,为企业增加了关于可持续发展目标优先级步骤的丰富信息。它还提供了引文的重要部分:Kaffashi, S.和Grayson, D.(2022):探索企业可持续发展目标的优先顺序过程。《世界企业家精神、管理和可持续发展杂志》,第18卷,第1期,第63-85页。收稿日期:2020年10月30日/修订日期:2021年3月14日/接受日期:2021年3月20日/发布日期:2021年10月30日版权所有:©2022以上文章的所有作者。本文由WASD在知识共享署名(CC by)许可(https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)的条款和条件下作为开放获取文章发布。企业探索可持续发展目标的优先排序过程WJEMSD V18 N1 2022©2022世界可持续发展协会(WASD) 65为企业,可持续发展领导者,政策制定者和更广泛的社会提供的信息,以考虑“谁”,“为什么”和“如何”做出可持续发展目标优先排序决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Exploring the Prioritisation Process of the Sustainable Development Goals by Business
PURPOSE: This study aims to investigate emergent working practices in terms of how individual businesses determine which SDGs are most relevant to them and therefore which ones to prioritise for their business. DESIGN/METHODOLOGY/APPROACH: A questionnaire-based method was applied to enhance corporate sustainability experts’ opinion on the specific subject of the SDG prioritisation process. FINDINGS: The results of this study suggest that board and CEO involvement in the process of decision-making for SDGs is lacking. Interestingly, the existence of current policies in place to reduce negative impacts together with commercial reasons were found to be the main motivation for prioritisation. In addition, many respondents indicated drawing a materiality matrix for the prioritisation process. Further investigations into the data indicated a lack of active research, ambition, and inaccurate reporting systems on SDGs for many of the studied companies. PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS: The results imply the need for regulatory policies for a quantitative reporting scheme. This will document both negative and positive impacts that can be measured clearly with KPIs, together with their financial implications. Another policy implication is for the government to introduce additional legislation and actively engage with industry to ensure that SDGs that are agreed by the global international community are adequately mandated. ORIGINALITY/VALUE: This study adds to businesses’ wealth of information on SDG prioritisation steps by combining different variables that are significant determinants of the SDG selection process. It also provides an essential piece of CITATION: Kaffashi, S. and Grayson, D. (2022): Exploring the Prioritisation Process of the Sustainable Development Goals by Business. World Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Sustainable Development, Vol. 18, No. 1, pp. 63–85. RECEIVED: 30 October 2020 / REVISED: 14 March 2021 / ACCEPTED: 20 March 2021 / PUBLISHED: 30 October 2021 COPYRIGHT: © 2022 by all the authors of the article above. The article is published as an open access article by WASD under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Exploring the Prioritisation Process of the Sustainable Development Goals by Business WJEMSD V18 N1 2022 © 2022 World Association for Sustainable Development (WASD) 65 information for businesses, sustainability leaders, policy-makers, and broader society to consider “who”, “why” and “how” the SDG prioritisation decisions are being made.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
期刊最新文献
A NEW PHILOSOPHY FOR SUSTAINABLE CONSUMERISM THE ROLE OF UNIVERSITY IN SPREADING ENVIRONMENTAL AWARENESS AMONG STUDENTS TO ACHIEVE ENVIRONMENTAL CITIZENSHIP SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT CONTRIBUTION TO ORGANISATIONAL SUSTAINABILITY HARNESSING PSYCHOLOGICAL CAPITAL TO AUGMENT EMPLOYEE ENGAGEMENT IN THE MICRO-FINANCE SME SECTOR JOURNEY THROUGH THE PAST: A CONTINUITY OF ECOLOGICAL CHALLENGES
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1