在cesar Aira、Mario Levrero和Ricardo Pigia的一些作品中,机器作为文学的外意识

Q4 Arts and Humanities Humanidades Pub Date : 2019-01-01 DOI:10.25185/6.3
V. Mora
{"title":"在cesar Aira、Mario Levrero和Ricardo Pigia的一些作品中,机器作为文学的外意识","authors":"V. Mora","doi":"10.25185/6.3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"From the very beginning of Literature, there’s a deep link between human beings and imaginary androids. The presence of this ancient topic in nowadays literature should by no means be regarded as extraordinary, insofar those machines in current times are involved in worldwide scientific and philosophical discussions about the ethical limits of Artificial Intelligence and the trueness and scales of their cognition and awareness. The main idea of this paper is that there are good grounds to suppose that our perceiving and reasoning skills are indeed reproductible and developable by machines, not only in the view of neuroscientific theories that maintain expanded or distributed cognition, but also in the imagination of some Latin-American writers, such as Mario Levrero (La maquina de pensar en Gladys), Cesar Aira (in many books, especially in El pequeno monje budista) and Ricardo Piglia (La ciudad ausente). Those authors seem to explore the possibility of a fictious exoconsciousness.","PeriodicalId":52962,"journal":{"name":"Humanidades","volume":"3 4 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"La máquina como exoconciencia literaria en algunas obras de César Aira, Mario Levrero y Ricardo Pigia\",\"authors\":\"V. Mora\",\"doi\":\"10.25185/6.3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"From the very beginning of Literature, there’s a deep link between human beings and imaginary androids. The presence of this ancient topic in nowadays literature should by no means be regarded as extraordinary, insofar those machines in current times are involved in worldwide scientific and philosophical discussions about the ethical limits of Artificial Intelligence and the trueness and scales of their cognition and awareness. The main idea of this paper is that there are good grounds to suppose that our perceiving and reasoning skills are indeed reproductible and developable by machines, not only in the view of neuroscientific theories that maintain expanded or distributed cognition, but also in the imagination of some Latin-American writers, such as Mario Levrero (La maquina de pensar en Gladys), Cesar Aira (in many books, especially in El pequeno monje budista) and Ricardo Piglia (La ciudad ausente). Those authors seem to explore the possibility of a fictious exoconsciousness.\",\"PeriodicalId\":52962,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Humanidades\",\"volume\":\"3 4 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Humanidades\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.25185/6.3\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Humanidades","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25185/6.3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

从文学的一开始,人类和想象中的机器人就有着很深的联系。这个古老的话题出现在当今的文学作品中,绝不应该被认为是非同寻常的,因为在当今时代,这些机器参与了关于人工智能的伦理限制以及它们的认知和意识的真实性和规模的全球科学和哲学讨论。本文的主要观点是,我们有充分的理由假设我们的感知和推理技能确实可以被机器复制和发展,不仅在维持扩展或分布式认知的神经科学理论的观点中,而且在一些拉丁美洲作家的想象中,如马里奥·莱维罗(La maquina de pensar en Gladys),凯撒·艾拉(在许多书中,特别是在El pequeno monje budista)和里卡多·皮格里亚(La ciudad ausente)。这些作者似乎在探索一种虚构的外意识的可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
La máquina como exoconciencia literaria en algunas obras de César Aira, Mario Levrero y Ricardo Pigia
From the very beginning of Literature, there’s a deep link between human beings and imaginary androids. The presence of this ancient topic in nowadays literature should by no means be regarded as extraordinary, insofar those machines in current times are involved in worldwide scientific and philosophical discussions about the ethical limits of Artificial Intelligence and the trueness and scales of their cognition and awareness. The main idea of this paper is that there are good grounds to suppose that our perceiving and reasoning skills are indeed reproductible and developable by machines, not only in the view of neuroscientific theories that maintain expanded or distributed cognition, but also in the imagination of some Latin-American writers, such as Mario Levrero (La maquina de pensar en Gladys), Cesar Aira (in many books, especially in El pequeno monje budista) and Ricardo Piglia (La ciudad ausente). Those authors seem to explore the possibility of a fictious exoconsciousness.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
Aprender de la bio-eco-crítica en el centro de las humanidades ambientales entrevista a Gisela Heffes. Entrevista por Sofía Rosa y Azucena Castro Demandas socioambientales y visualidad en América Latina el caso de Agitazo por los humedales (Argentina) Diálogos interdisciplinarios sobre las relaciones de poder que hay entre los tecnócratas del Proyecto de navegabilidad del río Meta y los Achaguas Teoría para la caída libre con ejercicios acompañantes “Proyecto “Arte en riesgo” una experiencia interdisciplinar”
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1