Christopher Sutton, Andrew S. Pooley, Kevin D. Jones, Richard W. Dover, Patricia Haines
{"title":"一项前瞻性,随机,双盲对照试验腹腔镜子宫神经消融术治疗盆腔疼痛与子宫内膜异位症","authors":"Christopher Sutton, Andrew S. Pooley, Kevin D. Jones, Richard W. Dover, Patricia Haines","doi":"10.1046/j.1365-2508.2001.00451.x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>To determine the value of laparoscopic uterine nerve ablation (LUNA) as part of the laparoscopic laser treatment of painful endometriosis.</p><p>A prospective randomized double-blind controlled trial.</p><p>A referral centre for the treatment of endometriosis.</p><p>51 women with pelvic pain and pelvic endometriosis.</p><p>All patients underwent laparoscopic laser ablation of their endometriosis and were then randomly allocated to receive LUNA or no further treatment.</p><p>Dysmenorrhoea, dyspareunia and chronic non-menstrual pelvic pain were assessed using visual analogue scales and structured questionnaires, preoperatively and at 3 and 6 months postoperatively.</p><p>24 patients were randomly allocated to receive laser vaporization alone, and 27 to receive a LUNA procedure in addition. The mean age of the patients involved was 28 years (range 20–41), with no differences between the groups for stage of endometriosis. Comparisons were made between the two treatment groups at 3 and 6 months. Significant differences in favour of the non-LUNA group were found at 3 months (<i>P</i> = 0.003), and at 6 months (<i>P</i> = 0.022) for dysmenorrhoea. A significant difference in favour of the non-LUNA group also occurred at 6 months for chronic non-menstrual pain (<i>P</i> = 0.323). There were no significant differences recorded for dyspareunia. Bonferroni's adjustment was applied, and the only difference which remained significant was for dysmenorrhoea at 3 months (<i>P</i> = 0.033) in favour of the non-LUNA group. The preoperative and 6-month pain scores for all the patients were combined. There was a significant improvement in the pain scores recorded at 6 months (<i>P</i> < 0.0001).</p><p>Laparoscopic laser ablation of endometriosis is confirmed as an effective treatment, to which uterine nerve ablation adds no benefit.</p>","PeriodicalId":100599,"journal":{"name":"Gynaecological Endoscopy","volume":"10 4","pages":"217-222"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1046/j.1365-2508.2001.00451.x","citationCount":"55","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A prospective, randomized, double-blind controlled trial of laparoscopic uterine nerve ablation in the treatment of pelvic pain associated with endometriosis\",\"authors\":\"Christopher Sutton, Andrew S. Pooley, Kevin D. Jones, Richard W. Dover, Patricia Haines\",\"doi\":\"10.1046/j.1365-2508.2001.00451.x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>To determine the value of laparoscopic uterine nerve ablation (LUNA) as part of the laparoscopic laser treatment of painful endometriosis.</p><p>A prospective randomized double-blind controlled trial.</p><p>A referral centre for the treatment of endometriosis.</p><p>51 women with pelvic pain and pelvic endometriosis.</p><p>All patients underwent laparoscopic laser ablation of their endometriosis and were then randomly allocated to receive LUNA or no further treatment.</p><p>Dysmenorrhoea, dyspareunia and chronic non-menstrual pelvic pain were assessed using visual analogue scales and structured questionnaires, preoperatively and at 3 and 6 months postoperatively.</p><p>24 patients were randomly allocated to receive laser vaporization alone, and 27 to receive a LUNA procedure in addition. The mean age of the patients involved was 28 years (range 20–41), with no differences between the groups for stage of endometriosis. Comparisons were made between the two treatment groups at 3 and 6 months. Significant differences in favour of the non-LUNA group were found at 3 months (<i>P</i> = 0.003), and at 6 months (<i>P</i> = 0.022) for dysmenorrhoea. A significant difference in favour of the non-LUNA group also occurred at 6 months for chronic non-menstrual pain (<i>P</i> = 0.323). There were no significant differences recorded for dyspareunia. Bonferroni's adjustment was applied, and the only difference which remained significant was for dysmenorrhoea at 3 months (<i>P</i> = 0.033) in favour of the non-LUNA group. The preoperative and 6-month pain scores for all the patients were combined. There was a significant improvement in the pain scores recorded at 6 months (<i>P</i> < 0.0001).</p><p>Laparoscopic laser ablation of endometriosis is confirmed as an effective treatment, to which uterine nerve ablation adds no benefit.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100599,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Gynaecological Endoscopy\",\"volume\":\"10 4\",\"pages\":\"217-222\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2008-06-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1046/j.1365-2508.2001.00451.x\",\"citationCount\":\"55\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Gynaecological Endoscopy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1046/j.1365-2508.2001.00451.x\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gynaecological Endoscopy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1046/j.1365-2508.2001.00451.x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
A prospective, randomized, double-blind controlled trial of laparoscopic uterine nerve ablation in the treatment of pelvic pain associated with endometriosis
To determine the value of laparoscopic uterine nerve ablation (LUNA) as part of the laparoscopic laser treatment of painful endometriosis.
A prospective randomized double-blind controlled trial.
A referral centre for the treatment of endometriosis.
51 women with pelvic pain and pelvic endometriosis.
All patients underwent laparoscopic laser ablation of their endometriosis and were then randomly allocated to receive LUNA or no further treatment.
Dysmenorrhoea, dyspareunia and chronic non-menstrual pelvic pain were assessed using visual analogue scales and structured questionnaires, preoperatively and at 3 and 6 months postoperatively.
24 patients were randomly allocated to receive laser vaporization alone, and 27 to receive a LUNA procedure in addition. The mean age of the patients involved was 28 years (range 20–41), with no differences between the groups for stage of endometriosis. Comparisons were made between the two treatment groups at 3 and 6 months. Significant differences in favour of the non-LUNA group were found at 3 months (P = 0.003), and at 6 months (P = 0.022) for dysmenorrhoea. A significant difference in favour of the non-LUNA group also occurred at 6 months for chronic non-menstrual pain (P = 0.323). There were no significant differences recorded for dyspareunia. Bonferroni's adjustment was applied, and the only difference which remained significant was for dysmenorrhoea at 3 months (P = 0.033) in favour of the non-LUNA group. The preoperative and 6-month pain scores for all the patients were combined. There was a significant improvement in the pain scores recorded at 6 months (P < 0.0001).
Laparoscopic laser ablation of endometriosis is confirmed as an effective treatment, to which uterine nerve ablation adds no benefit.