利用统计学习技术筛选储层动态行为的地质不确定性

Marco Barbiero, F. Turri, P. Anastasi, E. D. Rossa
{"title":"利用统计学习技术筛选储层动态行为的地质不确定性","authors":"Marco Barbiero, F. Turri, P. Anastasi, E. D. Rossa","doi":"10.2118/196712-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n A statistical screening methodology is presented to address uncertainty related to main geological assumptions in green field modeling. The goals are the identification of the entire range of uncertainty on production, learning which are the most impacting geological uncertain inputs and understanding the relationships between geological scenarios and classes of dynamic behavior.\n The paper presents the methodology and an example application to a green field case study. The method is applied on an ensemble of reservoir models created by combining geological parameters across their range of uncertainty. The ensemble of models is then simulated with a selected development strategy and dynamic responses are grouped in classes of outcome through clustering algorithms. Ensemble responses are visualized on a multidimensional stacking plot, as a function of the geological input, and the most influential parameters are identified by axes sorting on the plot. Geological scenarios are then classified on dynamic responses through classification tree algorithms. Finally, a representative set of models is selected from the geological scenarios.\n The example study application shows a final oil recovery uncertainty range of 4:1, which is reasonable for a green field in lack of data. Such high range of uncertainty could hardly be found by common risk assessment based on fixed geological assumptions, which often tend to underestimate uncertainty on forecasts. Ensemble outcomes are grouped in four classes by oil recovery, plateau strength, produced water, and breakthrough time. The adoption of such clustering features gives a broad understanding of the reservoir dynamic response. The most influential geological inputs among the examined structural and sedimentological parameters in the example application result to be the fault orientation and channel fraction. This screening result highlights the main drivers of geological uncertainty and is useful for the following scenario classification phase. Classification of the geological scenarios leads to five classes of geological parameter sets, each linked to a main class of dynamic behavior, and finally to five representative models. These five models constitute an effective sampling of the geological uncertainty space which also captures the different types of dynamic response.\n This paper will contribute to widen the engineering experience on the use of machine learning for risk analysis by presenting an application on a real field case study to explore the relationship between geological uncertainty and reservoir dynamic behavior.","PeriodicalId":11098,"journal":{"name":"Day 2 Wed, September 18, 2019","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Screening of Geological Uncertainty on Reservoir Dynamic Behavior with Statistical Learning Techniques\",\"authors\":\"Marco Barbiero, F. Turri, P. Anastasi, E. D. Rossa\",\"doi\":\"10.2118/196712-ms\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n A statistical screening methodology is presented to address uncertainty related to main geological assumptions in green field modeling. The goals are the identification of the entire range of uncertainty on production, learning which are the most impacting geological uncertain inputs and understanding the relationships between geological scenarios and classes of dynamic behavior.\\n The paper presents the methodology and an example application to a green field case study. The method is applied on an ensemble of reservoir models created by combining geological parameters across their range of uncertainty. The ensemble of models is then simulated with a selected development strategy and dynamic responses are grouped in classes of outcome through clustering algorithms. Ensemble responses are visualized on a multidimensional stacking plot, as a function of the geological input, and the most influential parameters are identified by axes sorting on the plot. Geological scenarios are then classified on dynamic responses through classification tree algorithms. Finally, a representative set of models is selected from the geological scenarios.\\n The example study application shows a final oil recovery uncertainty range of 4:1, which is reasonable for a green field in lack of data. Such high range of uncertainty could hardly be found by common risk assessment based on fixed geological assumptions, which often tend to underestimate uncertainty on forecasts. Ensemble outcomes are grouped in four classes by oil recovery, plateau strength, produced water, and breakthrough time. The adoption of such clustering features gives a broad understanding of the reservoir dynamic response. The most influential geological inputs among the examined structural and sedimentological parameters in the example application result to be the fault orientation and channel fraction. This screening result highlights the main drivers of geological uncertainty and is useful for the following scenario classification phase. Classification of the geological scenarios leads to five classes of geological parameter sets, each linked to a main class of dynamic behavior, and finally to five representative models. These five models constitute an effective sampling of the geological uncertainty space which also captures the different types of dynamic response.\\n This paper will contribute to widen the engineering experience on the use of machine learning for risk analysis by presenting an application on a real field case study to explore the relationship between geological uncertainty and reservoir dynamic behavior.\",\"PeriodicalId\":11098,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Day 2 Wed, September 18, 2019\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-09-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Day 2 Wed, September 18, 2019\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2118/196712-ms\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 2 Wed, September 18, 2019","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/196712-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

提出了一种统计筛选方法,以解决与绿场建模中主要地质假设相关的不确定性。目标是识别生产的整个不确定性范围,了解哪些是最具影响的地质不确定性输入,并理解地质情景与动力行为类别之间的关系。本文介绍了该方法及其在绿地案例研究中的应用实例。该方法应用于通过组合地质参数在其不确定范围内创建的油藏模型的集合。然后用选定的开发策略模拟模型集合,并通过聚类算法将动态响应分组为结果类。集合响应作为地质输入的函数在多维叠加图上可视化,并通过在图上的轴排序来识别最具影响的参数。然后通过分类树算法对地质情景的动态响应进行分类。最后,从地质情景中选取了一组具有代表性的模型。示例研究应用表明,最终采收率不确定度范围为4:1,这对于缺乏数据的新油田来说是合理的。基于固定地质假设的常见风险评估很难发现如此高的不确定性范围,这往往倾向于低估预测的不确定性。综合结果根据采收率、平台强度、产出水和突破时间分为四类。这种聚类特征的采用使人们对储层的动态响应有了更广泛的了解。在实例应用中检验的构造和沉积参数中,影响最大的地质输入是断层走向和河道比例。该筛选结果突出了地质不确定性的主要驱动因素,对接下来的情景分类阶段很有用。地质情景的分类导致了五类地质参数集,每一类与动力行为的主要类别相关联,最后产生了五种代表性模型。这五种模型构成了地质不确定性空间的有效抽样,并捕获了不同类型的动力响应。本文将通过在实际现场案例研究中探讨地质不确定性与储层动态行为之间的关系,有助于扩大机器学习用于风险分析的工程经验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Screening of Geological Uncertainty on Reservoir Dynamic Behavior with Statistical Learning Techniques
A statistical screening methodology is presented to address uncertainty related to main geological assumptions in green field modeling. The goals are the identification of the entire range of uncertainty on production, learning which are the most impacting geological uncertain inputs and understanding the relationships between geological scenarios and classes of dynamic behavior. The paper presents the methodology and an example application to a green field case study. The method is applied on an ensemble of reservoir models created by combining geological parameters across their range of uncertainty. The ensemble of models is then simulated with a selected development strategy and dynamic responses are grouped in classes of outcome through clustering algorithms. Ensemble responses are visualized on a multidimensional stacking plot, as a function of the geological input, and the most influential parameters are identified by axes sorting on the plot. Geological scenarios are then classified on dynamic responses through classification tree algorithms. Finally, a representative set of models is selected from the geological scenarios. The example study application shows a final oil recovery uncertainty range of 4:1, which is reasonable for a green field in lack of data. Such high range of uncertainty could hardly be found by common risk assessment based on fixed geological assumptions, which often tend to underestimate uncertainty on forecasts. Ensemble outcomes are grouped in four classes by oil recovery, plateau strength, produced water, and breakthrough time. The adoption of such clustering features gives a broad understanding of the reservoir dynamic response. The most influential geological inputs among the examined structural and sedimentological parameters in the example application result to be the fault orientation and channel fraction. This screening result highlights the main drivers of geological uncertainty and is useful for the following scenario classification phase. Classification of the geological scenarios leads to five classes of geological parameter sets, each linked to a main class of dynamic behavior, and finally to five representative models. These five models constitute an effective sampling of the geological uncertainty space which also captures the different types of dynamic response. This paper will contribute to widen the engineering experience on the use of machine learning for risk analysis by presenting an application on a real field case study to explore the relationship between geological uncertainty and reservoir dynamic behavior.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Dynamically Conditioned Modeling to Address Development Challenges in a Highly Complex Fractured Basement Reservoir, Yemen Rejuvenating a Depleted Reservoir by Capitalizing Existing Facilities for Secondary Recovery in a Brownfield: A Case Study in Offshore Field Giant Field Development Optimisation with the Consideration of Regional Voidage Replacement Ratio EOR Technologies and Applications Towards 70% Recovery Factor Aspiration in Giant Carbonate Middle East Reservoirs Pitfalls of 3D Saturation Modelling in the Middle East
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1