诡辩、政治与哲学

Q4 Social Sciences Socialism and Democracy Pub Date : 2021-09-02 DOI:10.1080/08854300.2021.2110522
M. Callahan, H. Sheehan
{"title":"诡辩、政治与哲学","authors":"M. Callahan, H. Sheehan","doi":"10.1080/08854300.2021.2110522","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Social disintegration and immiseration continue apace with a corresponding intellectual disarray. Reasons to abolish capitalism multiply daily, while Reason is treated as if it were a devious plot. How did we arrive at this juncture and what tools do we have to both apprehend reality and organize collectively to change it? Since the late 1970s, as the last waves of revolution receded, poststructuralism, postmodernism, and identity-based radicalism positioned themselves not only as the best means by which to challenge authority and bring about change, but more specifically, to criticize Marx and Engels and the presumed failures of the revolutions of the last century. It is no accident that philosophy, science and rational thought have also been targeted since they were the very means these revolutions employed to achieve their ends. Meanwhile, the capitalist juggernaut advances unimpeded by such critical theory, indeed capitalism appears to thrive on it. The resulting confusion nonetheless provides an opportunity to re-examine fundamental premises and definitions. I asked Helena Sheehan for this interview because her formal training in philosophy combines with her years of active political engagement to offer a perspective from which to assess our current dilemmas. Mat Callahan: Often, today, I hear philosophy used as if it was the same as “opinion”. Everyone has their own philosophy and can mean by that whatever they wish. At the same time, science is often said to have made philosophy obsolete or has taken over its function as a method for apprehending reality. What then is the philosophy of science? Helena Sheehan: Different people, including different philosophers, define philosophy in different ways. I use it to mean world view, a set of underlying beliefs about the world centred on the core questions of the centuries, such as: the question of whether phenomena can be explained in terms of natural forces alone or whether appeal to supernatural forces can be justified (typically the question of belief in the existence of God) or the question of whether phenomena are interconnected in a web of causality or events are disconnected and Socialism and Democracy, 2021 Vol. 35, Nos. 2–3, 38–48, https://doi.org/10.1080/08854300.2021.2110522","PeriodicalId":40061,"journal":{"name":"Socialism and Democracy","volume":"15 1","pages":"38 - 48"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sophistry, Politics and Philosophy\",\"authors\":\"M. Callahan, H. Sheehan\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/08854300.2021.2110522\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Social disintegration and immiseration continue apace with a corresponding intellectual disarray. Reasons to abolish capitalism multiply daily, while Reason is treated as if it were a devious plot. How did we arrive at this juncture and what tools do we have to both apprehend reality and organize collectively to change it? Since the late 1970s, as the last waves of revolution receded, poststructuralism, postmodernism, and identity-based radicalism positioned themselves not only as the best means by which to challenge authority and bring about change, but more specifically, to criticize Marx and Engels and the presumed failures of the revolutions of the last century. It is no accident that philosophy, science and rational thought have also been targeted since they were the very means these revolutions employed to achieve their ends. Meanwhile, the capitalist juggernaut advances unimpeded by such critical theory, indeed capitalism appears to thrive on it. The resulting confusion nonetheless provides an opportunity to re-examine fundamental premises and definitions. I asked Helena Sheehan for this interview because her formal training in philosophy combines with her years of active political engagement to offer a perspective from which to assess our current dilemmas. Mat Callahan: Often, today, I hear philosophy used as if it was the same as “opinion”. Everyone has their own philosophy and can mean by that whatever they wish. At the same time, science is often said to have made philosophy obsolete or has taken over its function as a method for apprehending reality. What then is the philosophy of science? Helena Sheehan: Different people, including different philosophers, define philosophy in different ways. I use it to mean world view, a set of underlying beliefs about the world centred on the core questions of the centuries, such as: the question of whether phenomena can be explained in terms of natural forces alone or whether appeal to supernatural forces can be justified (typically the question of belief in the existence of God) or the question of whether phenomena are interconnected in a web of causality or events are disconnected and Socialism and Democracy, 2021 Vol. 35, Nos. 2–3, 38–48, https://doi.org/10.1080/08854300.2021.2110522\",\"PeriodicalId\":40061,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Socialism and Democracy\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"38 - 48\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Socialism and Democracy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/08854300.2021.2110522\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Socialism and Democracy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08854300.2021.2110522","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

社会解体和贫困继续迅速发展,随之而来的是智力混乱。废除资本主义的理由每天都在增加,而理性却被当作一个狡猾的阴谋来对待。我们是如何到达这个关键时刻的?我们有什么工具来理解现实并集体组织起来改变它?自20世纪70年代末以来,随着最后一波革命浪潮的消退,后结构主义、后现代主义和基于身份的激进主义不仅将自己定位为挑战权威和带来变革的最佳手段,而且更具体地说,是批评马克思和恩格斯以及上世纪革命的假定失败。哲学、科学和理性思维也成为攻击目标,这并非偶然,因为它们正是这些革命用来实现其目的的手段。与此同时,资本主义的霸主在这样的批判理论的阻碍下前进,事实上,资本主义似乎在此基础上茁壮成长。尽管如此,由此产生的混乱为重新审视基本前提和定义提供了机会。我邀请海伦娜·希恩接受这次采访,是因为她在哲学方面的正式培训,加上她多年来积极参与政治活动,为我们评估当前的困境提供了一个视角。Mat Callahan:今天,我经常听到人们把“哲学”当作“意见”来使用。每个人都有自己的哲学,可以通过他们想要的意思。同时,人们常说科学使哲学过时了,或者取代了哲学作为认识实在的方法的作用。那么什么是科学哲学呢?海伦娜·希恩:不同的人,包括不同的哲学家,以不同的方式定义哲学。我用它来表示世界观,一套关于世界的基本信念,围绕几个世纪以来的核心问题,例如:现象是否可以单独用自然力来解释的问题,或者诉诸超自然力量是否可以被证明是合理的(典型的问题是相信上帝存在的问题),或者现象是否在因果关系的网络中相互联系,或者事件是分开的问题,社会主义与民主,2021年第35卷,第2-3期,38-48期,https://doi.org/10.1080/08854300.2021.2110522
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Sophistry, Politics and Philosophy
Social disintegration and immiseration continue apace with a corresponding intellectual disarray. Reasons to abolish capitalism multiply daily, while Reason is treated as if it were a devious plot. How did we arrive at this juncture and what tools do we have to both apprehend reality and organize collectively to change it? Since the late 1970s, as the last waves of revolution receded, poststructuralism, postmodernism, and identity-based radicalism positioned themselves not only as the best means by which to challenge authority and bring about change, but more specifically, to criticize Marx and Engels and the presumed failures of the revolutions of the last century. It is no accident that philosophy, science and rational thought have also been targeted since they were the very means these revolutions employed to achieve their ends. Meanwhile, the capitalist juggernaut advances unimpeded by such critical theory, indeed capitalism appears to thrive on it. The resulting confusion nonetheless provides an opportunity to re-examine fundamental premises and definitions. I asked Helena Sheehan for this interview because her formal training in philosophy combines with her years of active political engagement to offer a perspective from which to assess our current dilemmas. Mat Callahan: Often, today, I hear philosophy used as if it was the same as “opinion”. Everyone has their own philosophy and can mean by that whatever they wish. At the same time, science is often said to have made philosophy obsolete or has taken over its function as a method for apprehending reality. What then is the philosophy of science? Helena Sheehan: Different people, including different philosophers, define philosophy in different ways. I use it to mean world view, a set of underlying beliefs about the world centred on the core questions of the centuries, such as: the question of whether phenomena can be explained in terms of natural forces alone or whether appeal to supernatural forces can be justified (typically the question of belief in the existence of God) or the question of whether phenomena are interconnected in a web of causality or events are disconnected and Socialism and Democracy, 2021 Vol. 35, Nos. 2–3, 38–48, https://doi.org/10.1080/08854300.2021.2110522
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Socialism and Democracy
Socialism and Democracy Social Sciences-Sociology and Political Science
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
34
期刊介绍: Socialism and Democracy is committed to showing the continuing relevance of socialist politics and vision. Socialism and Democracy brings together the worlds of scholarship and activism, theory and practice, to examine in depth the core issues and popular movements of our time. The perspective is broadly Marxist, encouraging not only critique of the status quo, but also informed analysis of the many different approaches to bringing about fundamental change, and seeking to integrate issues of race, gender, sexuality, ethnicity and nationality with the traditional focus on class. Articles reflect many disciplines; our geographical scope is global; authors include activists and independent scholars as well as academics.
期刊最新文献
Communism, Poetry: Communicating Vessels (Some Insubordinate Essays, 1999–2018)Darko Suvin, Communism, Poetry: Communicating Vessels (Some Insubordinate Essays, 1999–2018) (Toronto: Political Animal Press, 2020, 280 pp., $29.99) The Old Mole and the New Democratic Party: Why the NDP is an Impediment to Social Progress in Canada On N. K. Jemisin and Speculative Fiction as a Liberatory Space The Impact of Censorship on COVID-19 Policy Formation in the United States Tracing Homelands: Israel, Palestine, and the Claims of BelongingLinda Dittmar, Tracing Homelands: Israel, Palestine, and the Claims of Belonging (Northampton, MA: Olive Branch Press, 2023, 240 pp., $20)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1