{"title":"《圣训》的方法与《可兰经》在纳克德·阿尔-马德法典》中的方法一致","authors":"Muhammad Qomarullah","doi":"10.29240/alquds.v6i3.4041","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Matan Hadith Criticism Method With the Qur'anic Approach in the Rules of Naqd Al-Matan ScienceThis article discusses how the position of al-Qur’ān in analyzing the prophet's hadith in studying the contents of the hadith of the Prophet Muhammad. The method of criticism of this hadith with the interpretation of the al-Qur'ān is not new, because starting from among the Companions like Āishah have already done it, then it becomes a reference for the next scholars. Hadith, which is seen as a source of reference for understanding the Qur'an, is a normative basis in determining legal arguments or statements, because the Prophet has full authority to explain the Koran, the provider of legal statements, and the Messenger of Allah also need to be obeyed and emulated as an ideal human being in applying the contents of al-Qur'ān. However, the hadiths that come from the Messenger of Allah need to be examined a lot because of the varying quality of hadiths so that it becomes a debate about the authenticity of the Messenger of Allah because the problem of the hadiths being different from the contents of the Qur'an, while the Messenger of Allah is unlikely to differ from the Qur'an. Therefore, the Naqd al-Matan method, 'Ilm Mukhtalaf al-Ḥadīṡ and textual contradiction analysis (‘Ilm ta'āraḍ az-Żāhirī) are the methods for analyzing the contradiction. So, the approach of al-Jamu' wa at-Taufīq (compromise), Nāsikh wa Mansūkh, and at-Tarjīḥ as a tool of analysis to find out the location of the problem from the hadith which contradicts al-Qur'ān and to take a common ground in accordance with the absolute truth of Allah from Rasulullah","PeriodicalId":52891,"journal":{"name":"Al Quds Jurnal Studi Alquran dan Hadis","volume":"1143 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Metode Kritik Matan Hadis Dengan Pendekatan Alquran Dalam Kaidah Ilmu Naqd Al-Matan\",\"authors\":\"Muhammad Qomarullah\",\"doi\":\"10.29240/alquds.v6i3.4041\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The Matan Hadith Criticism Method With the Qur'anic Approach in the Rules of Naqd Al-Matan ScienceThis article discusses how the position of al-Qur’ān in analyzing the prophet's hadith in studying the contents of the hadith of the Prophet Muhammad. The method of criticism of this hadith with the interpretation of the al-Qur'ān is not new, because starting from among the Companions like Āishah have already done it, then it becomes a reference for the next scholars. Hadith, which is seen as a source of reference for understanding the Qur'an, is a normative basis in determining legal arguments or statements, because the Prophet has full authority to explain the Koran, the provider of legal statements, and the Messenger of Allah also need to be obeyed and emulated as an ideal human being in applying the contents of al-Qur'ān. However, the hadiths that come from the Messenger of Allah need to be examined a lot because of the varying quality of hadiths so that it becomes a debate about the authenticity of the Messenger of Allah because the problem of the hadiths being different from the contents of the Qur'an, while the Messenger of Allah is unlikely to differ from the Qur'an. Therefore, the Naqd al-Matan method, 'Ilm Mukhtalaf al-Ḥadīṡ and textual contradiction analysis (‘Ilm ta'āraḍ az-Żāhirī) are the methods for analyzing the contradiction. So, the approach of al-Jamu' wa at-Taufīq (compromise), Nāsikh wa Mansūkh, and at-Tarjīḥ as a tool of analysis to find out the location of the problem from the hadith which contradicts al-Qur'ān and to take a common ground in accordance with the absolute truth of Allah from Rasulullah\",\"PeriodicalId\":52891,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Al Quds Jurnal Studi Alquran dan Hadis\",\"volume\":\"1143 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Al Quds Jurnal Studi Alquran dan Hadis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.29240/alquds.v6i3.4041\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Al Quds Jurnal Studi Alquran dan Hadis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29240/alquds.v6i3.4041","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
《圣训科学规则》中《古兰经》的解读方法本文在研究先知穆罕默德圣训的内容中,探讨了《古兰经》ān在先知圣训分析中的地位。用对古兰经ān的解释来批评这段圣训的方法并不新鲜,因为从像Āishah这样的同伴开始,它就成为了下一批学者的参考。圣训被视为理解《古兰经》的参考来源,是确定法律论点或陈述的规范基础,因为先知有充分的权力解释《古兰经》,法律陈述的提供者,安拉的使者在应用《古兰经ān》的内容时也需要被服从和效仿,作为一个理想的人。然而,来自安拉使者的圣训需要进行大量的研究,因为圣训的质量各不相同,所以这就成为了关于安拉使者的真实性的争论,因为圣训的问题与古兰经的内容不同,而安拉的使者不太可能与古兰经不同。因此,Naqd al- matan方法、Ilm Mukhtalaf al-Ḥadīṡ和文本矛盾分析(Ilm ta āraḍ az-Żāhirī)是分析矛盾的方法。因此,al-Jamu' wa at- tauf q(妥协)、Nāsikh wa Mansūkh和at- tarjj ā z作为分析工具,从与《古兰经》ān相矛盾的圣训中找出问题的根源,并根据拉苏鲁拉的真主的绝对真理采取共同立场
Metode Kritik Matan Hadis Dengan Pendekatan Alquran Dalam Kaidah Ilmu Naqd Al-Matan
The Matan Hadith Criticism Method With the Qur'anic Approach in the Rules of Naqd Al-Matan ScienceThis article discusses how the position of al-Qur’ān in analyzing the prophet's hadith in studying the contents of the hadith of the Prophet Muhammad. The method of criticism of this hadith with the interpretation of the al-Qur'ān is not new, because starting from among the Companions like Āishah have already done it, then it becomes a reference for the next scholars. Hadith, which is seen as a source of reference for understanding the Qur'an, is a normative basis in determining legal arguments or statements, because the Prophet has full authority to explain the Koran, the provider of legal statements, and the Messenger of Allah also need to be obeyed and emulated as an ideal human being in applying the contents of al-Qur'ān. However, the hadiths that come from the Messenger of Allah need to be examined a lot because of the varying quality of hadiths so that it becomes a debate about the authenticity of the Messenger of Allah because the problem of the hadiths being different from the contents of the Qur'an, while the Messenger of Allah is unlikely to differ from the Qur'an. Therefore, the Naqd al-Matan method, 'Ilm Mukhtalaf al-Ḥadīṡ and textual contradiction analysis (‘Ilm ta'āraḍ az-Żāhirī) are the methods for analyzing the contradiction. So, the approach of al-Jamu' wa at-Taufīq (compromise), Nāsikh wa Mansūkh, and at-Tarjīḥ as a tool of analysis to find out the location of the problem from the hadith which contradicts al-Qur'ān and to take a common ground in accordance with the absolute truth of Allah from Rasulullah