[创伤患者血糖水平及其变异性与预后的相关性分析]。

Zhaohui Liu, L. Su, Jingjing Wu, Jianfeng Tan, Y. Liao, Zhi-Feng Liu
{"title":"[创伤患者血糖水平及其变异性与预后的相关性分析]。","authors":"Zhaohui Liu, L. Su, Jingjing Wu, Jianfeng Tan, Y. Liao, Zhi-Feng Liu","doi":"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1003-0603.2012.11.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVE\nTo investigate the effect of glucose level, variability on the prognosis of traumatic patients.\n\n\nMETHODS\nA retrospective study involving 300 traumatic patients admitted to intensive care unit (ICU) was performed. The average glucose (GluAve), glucose standard deviation (GluSD) and glucose coefficient of variation (GluCV) during the first 72 hours were calculated. Patients were divided into survivor group (n=249) and non-survivor group (n=51) based on outcomes. The GluAve, GluSD and GluCV were compared between the two groups. Patients were allocated into five subgroups based on GluAve (3.9-5.5, 5.6-6.6, 6.7-7.7, 7.8-9.9, ≥10.0 mmol/L) as well as four subgroups on GluCV (<15%, 15%-30%, 30%-50%, >50%). The mortality in hospital was compared among the different subgroups and the different GluCV in the same level of GluAve subgroups, respectively. Multifactor logistic regression was used to determine the risk factor of hospital death.\n\n\nRESULTS\nThe levels of GluAve, GIuSD, GluCV of non-survivor group were higher than those of survivor group [11.31±4.38 mmol/L vs. 8.50±3.40 mmol/L, 2.85±1.94 mmol/L vs. 1.87±1.67 mmol/L, (28.30±23.08)% vs. (20.90±13.70)%, all P<0.05]. With the gradual increment of GluAve and GluCV level, the mortality was raised accordingly (χ (2)(1)=26.332, P=0.000; χ (2)(2)=65.522, P=0.000). In the subgroup of GluAve 7.8-9.9 mmol/L, the mortality was 9.09% (3/33) with GluCV <15% versus 46.15% (6/13) with GluCV >50% (P<0.01) respectively, and in the subgroup of GluAve ≥10.0 mmol/L, the mortality corresponding rates were 21.05% (4/19) with GluCV < 15% and 61.54% (8/13) with GluCV > 50% (P<0.05). The multivariable logistic regression analysis demonstrated that GluAve and GluCV were risk factors of mortality[GluAve odds ratio (OR)=1.150, 95% confidence interval (95%CI) was 1.042 to 1.270, P=0.006; GluCV OR=1.022, 95%CI was 0.999 to 1.040, P=0.040], GluSD had no effect on mortality.\n\n\nCONCLUSIONS\nThe increase in GluAve and GluCV in traumatic patients are significantly correlated with mortality. Control the level and the variability of blood glucose might be an important aspect of the multiple trauma death reduction.","PeriodicalId":23992,"journal":{"name":"Zhongguo wei zhong bing ji jiu yi xue = Chinese critical care medicine = Zhongguo weizhongbing jijiuyixue","volume":"27 1","pages":"643-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[The correlation analysis between glucose level and its variability and prognosis in traumatic patients].\",\"authors\":\"Zhaohui Liu, L. Su, Jingjing Wu, Jianfeng Tan, Y. Liao, Zhi-Feng Liu\",\"doi\":\"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1003-0603.2012.11.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"OBJECTIVE\\nTo investigate the effect of glucose level, variability on the prognosis of traumatic patients.\\n\\n\\nMETHODS\\nA retrospective study involving 300 traumatic patients admitted to intensive care unit (ICU) was performed. The average glucose (GluAve), glucose standard deviation (GluSD) and glucose coefficient of variation (GluCV) during the first 72 hours were calculated. Patients were divided into survivor group (n=249) and non-survivor group (n=51) based on outcomes. The GluAve, GluSD and GluCV were compared between the two groups. Patients were allocated into five subgroups based on GluAve (3.9-5.5, 5.6-6.6, 6.7-7.7, 7.8-9.9, ≥10.0 mmol/L) as well as four subgroups on GluCV (<15%, 15%-30%, 30%-50%, >50%). The mortality in hospital was compared among the different subgroups and the different GluCV in the same level of GluAve subgroups, respectively. Multifactor logistic regression was used to determine the risk factor of hospital death.\\n\\n\\nRESULTS\\nThe levels of GluAve, GIuSD, GluCV of non-survivor group were higher than those of survivor group [11.31±4.38 mmol/L vs. 8.50±3.40 mmol/L, 2.85±1.94 mmol/L vs. 1.87±1.67 mmol/L, (28.30±23.08)% vs. (20.90±13.70)%, all P<0.05]. With the gradual increment of GluAve and GluCV level, the mortality was raised accordingly (χ (2)(1)=26.332, P=0.000; χ (2)(2)=65.522, P=0.000). In the subgroup of GluAve 7.8-9.9 mmol/L, the mortality was 9.09% (3/33) with GluCV <15% versus 46.15% (6/13) with GluCV >50% (P<0.01) respectively, and in the subgroup of GluAve ≥10.0 mmol/L, the mortality corresponding rates were 21.05% (4/19) with GluCV < 15% and 61.54% (8/13) with GluCV > 50% (P<0.05). The multivariable logistic regression analysis demonstrated that GluAve and GluCV were risk factors of mortality[GluAve odds ratio (OR)=1.150, 95% confidence interval (95%CI) was 1.042 to 1.270, P=0.006; GluCV OR=1.022, 95%CI was 0.999 to 1.040, P=0.040], GluSD had no effect on mortality.\\n\\n\\nCONCLUSIONS\\nThe increase in GluAve and GluCV in traumatic patients are significantly correlated with mortality. Control the level and the variability of blood glucose might be an important aspect of the multiple trauma death reduction.\",\"PeriodicalId\":23992,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Zhongguo wei zhong bing ji jiu yi xue = Chinese critical care medicine = Zhongguo weizhongbing jijiuyixue\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"643-6\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Zhongguo wei zhong bing ji jiu yi xue = Chinese critical care medicine = Zhongguo weizhongbing jijiuyixue\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1003-0603.2012.11.002\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zhongguo wei zhong bing ji jiu yi xue = Chinese critical care medicine = Zhongguo weizhongbing jijiuyixue","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1003-0603.2012.11.002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

目的探讨血糖水平、变异性对创伤患者预后的影响。方法对300例重症监护病房(ICU)外伤患者进行回顾性研究。计算前72 h的平均葡萄糖(GluAve)、葡萄糖标准差(GluSD)和葡萄糖变异系数(GluCV)。根据预后将患者分为生存组(249例)和非生存组(51例)。比较两组间GluAve、GluSD、GluCV的差异。根据GluAve分为5个亚组(3.9-5.5、5.6-6.6、6.7-7.7、7.8-9.9、≥10.0 mmol/L),根据GluCV分为4个亚组(50%)。比较不同亚组间的住院死亡率和同一水平GluAve亚组内不同葡糖苷含量的住院死亡率。采用多因素logistic回归分析确定医院死亡的危险因素。结果未存活组GluAve、GIuSD、GluCV水平均高于存活组[11.31±4.38 mmol/L vs. 8.50±3.40 mmol/L, 2.85±1.94 mmol/L vs. 1.87±1.67 mmol/L,(28.30±23.08)% vs.(20.90±13.70)%,均为P50% (P<0.05)。多变量logistic回归分析显示,GluAve和GluCV是死亡率的危险因素[GluAve优势比(OR)=1.150, 95%可信区间(95% ci)为1.042 ~ 1.270,P=0.006;glv OR=1.022, 95%CI为0.999 ~ 1.040,P=0.040], GluSD对死亡率无影响。结论创伤患者GluAve和GluCV的升高与死亡率显著相关。控制血糖水平和变异性可能是减少多重创伤死亡的一个重要方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[The correlation analysis between glucose level and its variability and prognosis in traumatic patients].
OBJECTIVE To investigate the effect of glucose level, variability on the prognosis of traumatic patients. METHODS A retrospective study involving 300 traumatic patients admitted to intensive care unit (ICU) was performed. The average glucose (GluAve), glucose standard deviation (GluSD) and glucose coefficient of variation (GluCV) during the first 72 hours were calculated. Patients were divided into survivor group (n=249) and non-survivor group (n=51) based on outcomes. The GluAve, GluSD and GluCV were compared between the two groups. Patients were allocated into five subgroups based on GluAve (3.9-5.5, 5.6-6.6, 6.7-7.7, 7.8-9.9, ≥10.0 mmol/L) as well as four subgroups on GluCV (<15%, 15%-30%, 30%-50%, >50%). The mortality in hospital was compared among the different subgroups and the different GluCV in the same level of GluAve subgroups, respectively. Multifactor logistic regression was used to determine the risk factor of hospital death. RESULTS The levels of GluAve, GIuSD, GluCV of non-survivor group were higher than those of survivor group [11.31±4.38 mmol/L vs. 8.50±3.40 mmol/L, 2.85±1.94 mmol/L vs. 1.87±1.67 mmol/L, (28.30±23.08)% vs. (20.90±13.70)%, all P<0.05]. With the gradual increment of GluAve and GluCV level, the mortality was raised accordingly (χ (2)(1)=26.332, P=0.000; χ (2)(2)=65.522, P=0.000). In the subgroup of GluAve 7.8-9.9 mmol/L, the mortality was 9.09% (3/33) with GluCV <15% versus 46.15% (6/13) with GluCV >50% (P<0.01) respectively, and in the subgroup of GluAve ≥10.0 mmol/L, the mortality corresponding rates were 21.05% (4/19) with GluCV < 15% and 61.54% (8/13) with GluCV > 50% (P<0.05). The multivariable logistic regression analysis demonstrated that GluAve and GluCV were risk factors of mortality[GluAve odds ratio (OR)=1.150, 95% confidence interval (95%CI) was 1.042 to 1.270, P=0.006; GluCV OR=1.022, 95%CI was 0.999 to 1.040, P=0.040], GluSD had no effect on mortality. CONCLUSIONS The increase in GluAve and GluCV in traumatic patients are significantly correlated with mortality. Control the level and the variability of blood glucose might be an important aspect of the multiple trauma death reduction.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
[Early treatment of atelectasis by bronchoscopy in craniotomy patients]. [Effects of ulinastatin on Toll like receptor 4 expression in endotoxin induced myocardial injury rats]. [Evaluation of circulating microRNA-92a for endothelial damage induced by percutaneous coronary intervention]. [The predictive values of D-dimer for the early prognosis of the acute myocardial infarction (AMI): a review of 3134 AMI patients]. [Correlation between osteoprotegerin gene 209G/A, 245T/G and 1181G/C polymorphism and acute coronary syndromes in Han people of Fujian area].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1