VeriBench:分析具有可验证性的数据库系统的性能

Cong Yue, Meihui Zhang, Changhao Zhu, Gang Chen, Dumitrel Loghin, B. Ooi
{"title":"VeriBench:分析具有可验证性的数据库系统的性能","authors":"Cong Yue, Meihui Zhang, Changhao Zhu, Gang Chen, Dumitrel Loghin, B. Ooi","doi":"10.14778/3598581.3598588","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Database systems are paying more attention to data security in recent years. Immutable systems such as blockchains, verifiable databases, and ledger databases are equipped with various verifiability mechanisms to protect data. Such systems often adopt different threat models, and techniques, therefore, have different performance implications compared to traditional database systems. So far, there is no uniform benchmarking tool for evaluating the performance of these systems, especially at the level of verification functions. In this paper, we first survey the design space of the\n verifiability-enabled database systems\n along five dimensions: threat model, authenticated data structure (ADS), query processing, verification, and auditing. Based on this survey, we design and implement VeriBench, a benchmark framework for\n verifiability-enabled database systems.\n VeriBench enables a fair comparison of systems designed with different underlying technologies that share the client-side verification scheme, and focuses on design space exploration to provide a deeper understanding of different system design choices. VeriBench incorporates micro- and macro-benchmarks to provide a comprehensive evaluation. Further, VeriBench is designed to enable easy extension for benchmarking new systems and workloads. We run VeriBench to conduct a comprehensive analysis of state-of-the-art systems comprising blockchains, ledger databases, and log transparency technologies. The results expose the weaknesses and strengths of each underlying design choice, and the insights should serve as guidance for future development.\n","PeriodicalId":20467,"journal":{"name":"Proc. VLDB Endow.","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"VeriBench: Analyzing the Performance of Database Systems with Verifiability\",\"authors\":\"Cong Yue, Meihui Zhang, Changhao Zhu, Gang Chen, Dumitrel Loghin, B. Ooi\",\"doi\":\"10.14778/3598581.3598588\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Database systems are paying more attention to data security in recent years. Immutable systems such as blockchains, verifiable databases, and ledger databases are equipped with various verifiability mechanisms to protect data. Such systems often adopt different threat models, and techniques, therefore, have different performance implications compared to traditional database systems. So far, there is no uniform benchmarking tool for evaluating the performance of these systems, especially at the level of verification functions. In this paper, we first survey the design space of the\\n verifiability-enabled database systems\\n along five dimensions: threat model, authenticated data structure (ADS), query processing, verification, and auditing. Based on this survey, we design and implement VeriBench, a benchmark framework for\\n verifiability-enabled database systems.\\n VeriBench enables a fair comparison of systems designed with different underlying technologies that share the client-side verification scheme, and focuses on design space exploration to provide a deeper understanding of different system design choices. VeriBench incorporates micro- and macro-benchmarks to provide a comprehensive evaluation. Further, VeriBench is designed to enable easy extension for benchmarking new systems and workloads. We run VeriBench to conduct a comprehensive analysis of state-of-the-art systems comprising blockchains, ledger databases, and log transparency technologies. The results expose the weaknesses and strengths of each underlying design choice, and the insights should serve as guidance for future development.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":20467,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proc. VLDB Endow.\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proc. VLDB Endow.\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14778/3598581.3598588\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proc. VLDB Endow.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14778/3598581.3598588","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

近年来,数据库系统越来越重视数据安全问题。不可变系统,如区块链、可验证数据库和分类账数据库,配备了各种可验证机制来保护数据。这样的系统通常采用不同的威胁模型,因此,与传统数据库系统相比,技术具有不同的性能含义。到目前为止,还没有统一的基准测试工具来评估这些系统的性能,特别是在验证功能的级别上。在本文中,我们首先从威胁模型、身份验证数据结构(ADS)、查询处理、验证和审计五个方面调查了支持可验证性的数据库系统的设计空间。基于这项调查,我们设计并实现了VeriBench,这是一个可验证数据库系统的基准框架。VeriBench能够对使用共享客户端验证方案的不同底层技术设计的系统进行公平比较,并专注于设计空间探索,以提供对不同系统设计选择的更深入理解。VeriBench结合了微观和宏观基准,以提供全面的评估。此外,VeriBench旨在为新系统和工作负载的基准测试提供方便的扩展。我们运行VeriBench对最先进的系统进行全面分析,包括区块链、分类账数据库和日志透明技术。结果揭示了每个底层设计选择的弱点和优势,这些见解应该作为未来开发的指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
VeriBench: Analyzing the Performance of Database Systems with Verifiability
Database systems are paying more attention to data security in recent years. Immutable systems such as blockchains, verifiable databases, and ledger databases are equipped with various verifiability mechanisms to protect data. Such systems often adopt different threat models, and techniques, therefore, have different performance implications compared to traditional database systems. So far, there is no uniform benchmarking tool for evaluating the performance of these systems, especially at the level of verification functions. In this paper, we first survey the design space of the verifiability-enabled database systems along five dimensions: threat model, authenticated data structure (ADS), query processing, verification, and auditing. Based on this survey, we design and implement VeriBench, a benchmark framework for verifiability-enabled database systems. VeriBench enables a fair comparison of systems designed with different underlying technologies that share the client-side verification scheme, and focuses on design space exploration to provide a deeper understanding of different system design choices. VeriBench incorporates micro- and macro-benchmarks to provide a comprehensive evaluation. Further, VeriBench is designed to enable easy extension for benchmarking new systems and workloads. We run VeriBench to conduct a comprehensive analysis of state-of-the-art systems comprising blockchains, ledger databases, and log transparency technologies. The results expose the weaknesses and strengths of each underlying design choice, and the insights should serve as guidance for future development.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Cryptographically Secure Private Record Linkage Using Locality-Sensitive Hashing Utility-aware Payment Channel Network Rebalance Relational Query Synthesis ⋈ Decision Tree Learning Billion-Scale Bipartite Graph Embedding: A Global-Local Induced Approach Query Refinement for Diversity Constraint Satisfaction
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1