确定困难插管的理想术前预测因素

R. Garg, C. Dua
{"title":"确定困难插管的理想术前预测因素","authors":"R. Garg, C. Dua","doi":"10.4103/2394-6954.180649","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Unexpected difficult intubation is probably the result of inadequate preoperative examination of airway and a lack of accurate predictive tests for difficult intubation. Preoperative evaluation forms basis to suspect and be prepared for a difficult airway situation. Aim: The aim of our study was to identify the ideal preoperative predictors of difficult intubation. Materials and Methods: It was a Prospective Observational study done on 350 patients in a community-based hospital. Preoperative airway assessment included: Mallampati Class (MC), Mouth opening (MO), Thyromental distance (TMD), Ability to prognath (AP) and Neck mobility and size (NM). Monitors were attached, anesthesia induced and laryngoscopy performed. Intubation Difficulty Scale (IDS) score was used to grade difficulty in intubation. Results: The overall incidence of Difficult Intubation was 24.6 %. A slight difficulty in 24% (IDS = 1-5) and moderate to major difficulty (IDS >5) in 0.6% cases was noted. Intubation was possible in all the patients. Mallampati class III & Mouth opening was less than 4 cm in about 6% cases and Thyromental distance less than 6 cm in 5.4%. 12.5% were unable to prognath and Neck mobility was restricted in 4.6% patients. Sensitivity and specificity of MC- 16.3 % and 97%, MO- 16.3% and 96.6%, TMD - 12.8% and 97%, AP - 33.3% and 93.9% , NM - 10.5% and 97.3%. Positive and Negative Predictive Values for MC, MO, TMD, AP and NM were 63.6% and 78%, 60.9% and 78%, 57.9 and 77.3 %, 62.8% and 81.9%, 56.3% and 76.9% respectively. Conclusion: We concluded that Mallampati grading and ability to prognath are the most important of the variables studied.","PeriodicalId":17751,"journal":{"name":"Karnataka Anaesthesia Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Identification of ideal preoperative predictors for difficult intubation\",\"authors\":\"R. Garg, C. Dua\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/2394-6954.180649\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Unexpected difficult intubation is probably the result of inadequate preoperative examination of airway and a lack of accurate predictive tests for difficult intubation. Preoperative evaluation forms basis to suspect and be prepared for a difficult airway situation. Aim: The aim of our study was to identify the ideal preoperative predictors of difficult intubation. Materials and Methods: It was a Prospective Observational study done on 350 patients in a community-based hospital. Preoperative airway assessment included: Mallampati Class (MC), Mouth opening (MO), Thyromental distance (TMD), Ability to prognath (AP) and Neck mobility and size (NM). Monitors were attached, anesthesia induced and laryngoscopy performed. Intubation Difficulty Scale (IDS) score was used to grade difficulty in intubation. Results: The overall incidence of Difficult Intubation was 24.6 %. A slight difficulty in 24% (IDS = 1-5) and moderate to major difficulty (IDS >5) in 0.6% cases was noted. Intubation was possible in all the patients. Mallampati class III & Mouth opening was less than 4 cm in about 6% cases and Thyromental distance less than 6 cm in 5.4%. 12.5% were unable to prognath and Neck mobility was restricted in 4.6% patients. Sensitivity and specificity of MC- 16.3 % and 97%, MO- 16.3% and 96.6%, TMD - 12.8% and 97%, AP - 33.3% and 93.9% , NM - 10.5% and 97.3%. Positive and Negative Predictive Values for MC, MO, TMD, AP and NM were 63.6% and 78%, 60.9% and 78%, 57.9 and 77.3 %, 62.8% and 81.9%, 56.3% and 76.9% respectively. Conclusion: We concluded that Mallampati grading and ability to prognath are the most important of the variables studied.\",\"PeriodicalId\":17751,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Karnataka Anaesthesia Journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Karnataka Anaesthesia Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/2394-6954.180649\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Karnataka Anaesthesia Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/2394-6954.180649","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

背景:意外插管困难可能是由于术前气道检查不充分和缺乏准确的预测插管困难测试的结果。术前评估是怀疑和准备困难气道情况的基础。目的:我们研究的目的是确定困难插管的理想术前预测因素。材料与方法:对某社区医院350例患者进行前瞻性观察性研究。术前气道评估包括:Mallampati分级(MC)、开口(MO)、甲状腺距离(TMD)、妊娠能力(AP)和颈部活动度及大小(NM)。安装监护仪,麻醉诱导,喉镜检查。采用插管困难量表(IDS)评分对插管困难程度进行评分。结果:全组插管困难发生率为24.6%。24% (IDS = 1-5)的患者有轻微困难,0.6%的患者有中度至重度困难(IDS = 0.5)。所有患者均可插管。Mallampati III类:约6%的患者开口小于4cm, 5.4%的患者甲状腺距离小于6cm。12.5%的患者无法分娩,4.6%的患者颈部活动受限。MC- 16.3%和97%,MO- 16.3%和96.6%,TMD - 12.8%和97%,AP - 33.3%和93.9%,NM - 10.5%和97.3%。MC、MO、TMD、AP、NM的阳性预测值和阴性预测值分别为63.6%和78%、60.9%和78%、57.9%和77.3%、62.8%和81.9%、56.3%和76.9%。结论:我们认为Mallampati分级和生育能力是最重要的研究变量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Identification of ideal preoperative predictors for difficult intubation
Background: Unexpected difficult intubation is probably the result of inadequate preoperative examination of airway and a lack of accurate predictive tests for difficult intubation. Preoperative evaluation forms basis to suspect and be prepared for a difficult airway situation. Aim: The aim of our study was to identify the ideal preoperative predictors of difficult intubation. Materials and Methods: It was a Prospective Observational study done on 350 patients in a community-based hospital. Preoperative airway assessment included: Mallampati Class (MC), Mouth opening (MO), Thyromental distance (TMD), Ability to prognath (AP) and Neck mobility and size (NM). Monitors were attached, anesthesia induced and laryngoscopy performed. Intubation Difficulty Scale (IDS) score was used to grade difficulty in intubation. Results: The overall incidence of Difficult Intubation was 24.6 %. A slight difficulty in 24% (IDS = 1-5) and moderate to major difficulty (IDS >5) in 0.6% cases was noted. Intubation was possible in all the patients. Mallampati class III & Mouth opening was less than 4 cm in about 6% cases and Thyromental distance less than 6 cm in 5.4%. 12.5% were unable to prognath and Neck mobility was restricted in 4.6% patients. Sensitivity and specificity of MC- 16.3 % and 97%, MO- 16.3% and 96.6%, TMD - 12.8% and 97%, AP - 33.3% and 93.9% , NM - 10.5% and 97.3%. Positive and Negative Predictive Values for MC, MO, TMD, AP and NM were 63.6% and 78%, 60.9% and 78%, 57.9 and 77.3 %, 62.8% and 81.9%, 56.3% and 76.9% respectively. Conclusion: We concluded that Mallampati grading and ability to prognath are the most important of the variables studied.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A bizarre scenario during lung isolation due to interchanged double-lumen tube connectors Anesthetic management of a case of cleidocranial dysplasia Flexible intubation videoscope-guided replacement of tracheostomy tube in a carcinoma larynx patient with extensive subglottic involvement Comparative study of hemodynamic changes using proseal laryngeal mask airway, intubating laryngeal mask airway or laryngoscopic endotracheal intubation under general anesthesia in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting surgery A patient with Cushing's disease for pituitary tumor resection: Anesthetic challenges and management
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1