合并基于规则的信念数据库

Artificial intelligence and applications (Commerce, Calif.) Pub Date : 2007-02-12 DOI:10.7892/BORIS.26458

R. Wehbe

{"title":"合并基于规则的信念数据库","authors":"R. Wehbe","doi":"10.7892/BORIS.26458","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The problem of revising a belief database is treated in many classical works. We will consider here the problem of merging two belief databases (BDBs for short) Ψ1 and Ψ2, operation that will be denoted by Ψ1 Ψ2, and whose result will be a new BDB. Since belief not necessarily reflects the actual state of the world (as opposed to knowledge), both BDBs could be incompatible. The goal is to construct a new BDB trying to retain as much as possible of the original beliefs of Ψ1 and Ψ2.","PeriodicalId":91205,"journal":{"name":"Artificial intelligence and applications (Commerce, Calif.)","volume":"40 1","pages":"630-635"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Merging rule-based belief databases\",\"authors\":\"R. Wehbe\",\"doi\":\"10.7892/BORIS.26458\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The problem of revising a belief database is treated in many classical works. We will consider here the problem of merging two belief databases (BDBs for short) Ψ1 and Ψ2, operation that will be denoted by Ψ1 Ψ2, and whose result will be a new BDB. Since belief not necessarily reflects the actual state of the world (as opposed to knowledge), both BDBs could be incompatible. The goal is to construct a new BDB trying to retain as much as possible of the original beliefs of Ψ1 and Ψ2.\",\"PeriodicalId\":91205,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Artificial intelligence and applications (Commerce, Calif.)\",\"volume\":\"40 1\",\"pages\":\"630-635\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2007-02-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Artificial intelligence and applications (Commerce, Calif.)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7892/BORIS.26458\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Artificial intelligence and applications (Commerce, Calif.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7892/BORIS.26458","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

摘要

许多经典著作都讨论了信念数据库的修正问题。我们将在这里考虑合并两个信念数据库(简称BDB) Ψ1和Ψ2的问题，操作将用Ψ1 Ψ2表示，其结果将生成一个新的BDB。由于信念不一定反映世界的实际状态(与知识相反)，因此两种bdb可能是不相容的。我们的目标是构建一个新的BDB，尽量保留Ψ1和Ψ2的原始信念。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

Merging rule-based belief databases

The problem of revising a belief database is treated in many classical works. We will consider here the problem of merging two belief databases (BDBs for short) Ψ1 and Ψ2, operation that will be denoted by Ψ1 Ψ2, and whose result will be a new BDB. Since belief not necessarily reflects the actual state of the world (as opposed to knowledge), both BDBs could be incompatible. The goal is to construct a new BDB trying to retain as much as possible of the original beliefs of Ψ1 and Ψ2.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Artificial intelligence and applications (Commerce, Calif.)

自引率

0.00%

发文量