“量化分析师”的个性和动机:华尔街的数学天才

Q3 Economics, Econometrics and Finance Journal of Financial Management Markets and Institutions Pub Date : 2021-06-28 DOI:10.1142/s2282717x2150002x
A. Furnham, Sylvia Impellizzeri
{"title":"“量化分析师”的个性和动机:华尔街的数学天才","authors":"A. Furnham, Sylvia Impellizzeri","doi":"10.1142/s2282717x2150002x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A relatively small sample of experts ([Formula: see text]) working within the quantitative financial area completed two questionnaires measuring their personality and values. This study set out to determine how personality and motivation/work values predict subjective work success and organizational fit using the High Potential Traits Inventory (HPTI) and the Work Value Questionnaire (WVQ). Compared to the population norms, the “Quants” were higher on Curiosity and Conscientiousness but lower on Tolerance of Ambiguity and Risk-Taking Approach. The “Quants” scored higher than population norms on one facet of intrinsic motivation and all three of the extrinsic motivation. The results demonstrated that Conscientiousness and Intrinsic Motivation were both significant predictors of subjective work success. The results are discussed in terms of how to select, manage and promote “Quants”. Implications and limitations are discussed.","PeriodicalId":34440,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Financial Management Markets and Institutions","volume":"63 2 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"THE PERSONALITY AND MOTIVATION OF “QUANTS”: THE MATH GENIUSES OF WALL STREET\",\"authors\":\"A. Furnham, Sylvia Impellizzeri\",\"doi\":\"10.1142/s2282717x2150002x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A relatively small sample of experts ([Formula: see text]) working within the quantitative financial area completed two questionnaires measuring their personality and values. This study set out to determine how personality and motivation/work values predict subjective work success and organizational fit using the High Potential Traits Inventory (HPTI) and the Work Value Questionnaire (WVQ). Compared to the population norms, the “Quants” were higher on Curiosity and Conscientiousness but lower on Tolerance of Ambiguity and Risk-Taking Approach. The “Quants” scored higher than population norms on one facet of intrinsic motivation and all three of the extrinsic motivation. The results demonstrated that Conscientiousness and Intrinsic Motivation were both significant predictors of subjective work success. The results are discussed in terms of how to select, manage and promote “Quants”. Implications and limitations are discussed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":34440,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Financial Management Markets and Institutions\",\"volume\":\"63 2 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Financial Management Markets and Institutions\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1142/s2282717x2150002x\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Economics, Econometrics and Finance\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Financial Management Markets and Institutions","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1142/s2282717x2150002x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

在定量金融领域工作的一个相对较小的专家样本([公式:见文本])完成了两份测量他们个性和价值观的问卷。本研究采用高潜能特质量表(HPTI)和工作价值问卷(WVQ)来确定人格和动机/工作价值观如何预测主观工作成功和组织契合度。与总体标准相比,“宽客”在好奇心和责任心方面较高,但在模棱两可容忍度和冒险态度方面较低。“宽客”在内在动机的一个方面和外在动机的三个方面得分都高于一般人。结果表明,尽责性和内在动机都是主观工作成功的显著预测因子。研究结果从如何选择、管理和推广“量化分析师”的角度进行了讨论。讨论了影响和局限性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
THE PERSONALITY AND MOTIVATION OF “QUANTS”: THE MATH GENIUSES OF WALL STREET
A relatively small sample of experts ([Formula: see text]) working within the quantitative financial area completed two questionnaires measuring their personality and values. This study set out to determine how personality and motivation/work values predict subjective work success and organizational fit using the High Potential Traits Inventory (HPTI) and the Work Value Questionnaire (WVQ). Compared to the population norms, the “Quants” were higher on Curiosity and Conscientiousness but lower on Tolerance of Ambiguity and Risk-Taking Approach. The “Quants” scored higher than population norms on one facet of intrinsic motivation and all three of the extrinsic motivation. The results demonstrated that Conscientiousness and Intrinsic Motivation were both significant predictors of subjective work success. The results are discussed in terms of how to select, manage and promote “Quants”. Implications and limitations are discussed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Financial Management Markets and Institutions
Journal of Financial Management Markets and Institutions Economics, Econometrics and Finance-General Economics, Econometrics and Finance
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Analysing banks' performance during the recent breakdowns. Which were its main drivers? Sustainability Reporting: Evidence From Global Systemically Important Banks (G-SIBs) Risk Mapping as a Form of Banking Immunity Response to Covid-19 Pandemic Green Finance: past, present and future studies The Impact of SFAS166/167 on Bank Liquidity and Lending
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1