术后预防性抗生素;1007个病例的对照研究。

J. Barnes, W. Pace, D. S. Trump, E. H. Ellison
{"title":"术后预防性抗生素;1007个病例的对照研究。","authors":"J. Barnes, W. Pace, D. S. Trump, E. H. Ellison","doi":"10.1097/00006534-195911000-00030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The value of postoperative prophylactic antibiotics in general surgery has long been debated. At the time this study was undertaken, sufficient evidence to condemn or justify such use of antibiotics had not been presented. In a complete review of the literature, several studies concerning this problem were found. McKittrick and, more recently, Sanchez-Ubeda published work suggesting that prophylactic postoperative antibiotics do not diminish the incidence of postoperative infections in general surgical patients. Appleton and Wisebrun in urology and Tachdjian and Compere in orthopedics reached similar conclusions. The present investigation studied the effect of routinely administered antibiotics on the postoperative course of general surgical patients. To assure the validity of the findings, it was necessary to meet two criteria. The first was that the number of patients be significantly large. The second was that the study be adequately controlled. Materials and Methods All major operative cases of the general surgical service","PeriodicalId":6876,"journal":{"name":"A.M.A. archives of surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1959-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"53","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prophylactic postoperative antibiotics; a controlled study of 1,007 cases.\",\"authors\":\"J. Barnes, W. Pace, D. S. Trump, E. H. Ellison\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/00006534-195911000-00030\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The value of postoperative prophylactic antibiotics in general surgery has long been debated. At the time this study was undertaken, sufficient evidence to condemn or justify such use of antibiotics had not been presented. In a complete review of the literature, several studies concerning this problem were found. McKittrick and, more recently, Sanchez-Ubeda published work suggesting that prophylactic postoperative antibiotics do not diminish the incidence of postoperative infections in general surgical patients. Appleton and Wisebrun in urology and Tachdjian and Compere in orthopedics reached similar conclusions. The present investigation studied the effect of routinely administered antibiotics on the postoperative course of general surgical patients. To assure the validity of the findings, it was necessary to meet two criteria. The first was that the number of patients be significantly large. The second was that the study be adequately controlled. Materials and Methods All major operative cases of the general surgical service\",\"PeriodicalId\":6876,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"A.M.A. archives of surgery\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1959-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"53\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"A.M.A. archives of surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-195911000-00030\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"A.M.A. archives of surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-195911000-00030","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 53

摘要

普外科术后预防性抗生素的应用价值一直存在争议。在进行这项研究时,并没有足够的证据来谴责或证明这种抗生素的使用是合理的。在完整的文献回顾中,发现了一些关于这个问题的研究。McKittrick和最近的Sanchez-Ubeda发表的研究表明,预防性术后抗生素并不能减少普通外科患者术后感染的发生率。泌尿外科的Appleton和Wisebrun以及矫形外科的Tachdjian和Compere得出了类似的结论。本研究旨在探讨常规抗生素对普通外科患者术后病程的影响。为了确保调查结果的有效性,必须满足两个标准。第一个是病人的数量非常大。第二是研究要有充分的控制。材料与方法普外科主要手术病例
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Prophylactic postoperative antibiotics; a controlled study of 1,007 cases.
The value of postoperative prophylactic antibiotics in general surgery has long been debated. At the time this study was undertaken, sufficient evidence to condemn or justify such use of antibiotics had not been presented. In a complete review of the literature, several studies concerning this problem were found. McKittrick and, more recently, Sanchez-Ubeda published work suggesting that prophylactic postoperative antibiotics do not diminish the incidence of postoperative infections in general surgical patients. Appleton and Wisebrun in urology and Tachdjian and Compere in orthopedics reached similar conclusions. The present investigation studied the effect of routinely administered antibiotics on the postoperative course of general surgical patients. To assure the validity of the findings, it was necessary to meet two criteria. The first was that the number of patients be significantly large. The second was that the study be adequately controlled. Materials and Methods All major operative cases of the general surgical service
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Perforation of dura by a plastic catheter during continuous caudal anesthesia. Wound healing. I. Comparison of heat- and irradiation-sterilized surgical sutures. Results of treatment os squamous-cell carcinoma arising in mandibular gingiva. The surgical conscience. Experimental hemorrhage; prediction of mortality following acute measured hemorrhage in the dog.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1