东莨菪碱测试

IF 0.6 4区 医学 Q4 SURGERY European Surgery-Acta Chirurgica Austriaca Pub Date : 2008-10-09 DOI:10.1046/j.1563-2563.2002.02038.x
J. P. Ruurda, R. P. M. Simmermacher, I. H. M. Borel Rinkes, I. A. M. J. Broeders
{"title":"东莨菪碱测试","authors":"J. P. Ruurda,&nbsp;R. P. M. Simmermacher,&nbsp;I. H. M. Borel Rinkes,&nbsp;I. A. M. J. Broeders","doi":"10.1046/j.1563-2563.2002.02038.x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><b>Summary:</b> <span>Background</span>: Laparoscopic surgery offers distinct benefits to patients but places a burden on surgeons regarding manoeuvrability of instruments and visualization of the operating field. The introduction of robotic telemanipulation systems offers a solution to these problems in videoscopic surgery.<span>Methods</span>: In this study, the feasibility of robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery was assessed by performing 40 laparoscopic cholecystectomies with the da Vinci™ robotic system. Time necessary for system set-up and operation was recorded, as well as complications, technical problems, postoperative hospital stay, morbidity and mortality.<span>Results</span>: 39/40 procedures were completed laparoscopically with the da Vinci™ system. There were no intraoperative complications and only minor technical problems. Median hospitalization was 2 days. System set-up time decreased with increasing experience of the operating team. Operating time was at least comparable to times reported for standard laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the literature. There was neither postoperative mortality nor morbidity at the time of discharge and during short-term follow-up.<span>Conclusions</span>: Robot-assisted surgery was repeatedly proven as a safe and feasible approach to laparoscopic cholecystectomy.</p>","PeriodicalId":50475,"journal":{"name":"European Surgery-Acta Chirurgica Austriaca","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2008-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1046/j.1563-2563.2002.02038.x","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Robotic Surgery in a Routine ProcedureAn Evaluation of 40 Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Cholecystectomies\\n Die Anwendung des Operationsroboters bei einem allgemeinchirurgischen Routineeingriff– so belassen –Erfahrungen nach 40 Roboter-assistierten Cholezystektomien\",\"authors\":\"J. P. Ruurda,&nbsp;R. P. M. Simmermacher,&nbsp;I. H. M. Borel Rinkes,&nbsp;I. A. M. J. Broeders\",\"doi\":\"10.1046/j.1563-2563.2002.02038.x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><b>Summary:</b> <span>Background</span>: Laparoscopic surgery offers distinct benefits to patients but places a burden on surgeons regarding manoeuvrability of instruments and visualization of the operating field. The introduction of robotic telemanipulation systems offers a solution to these problems in videoscopic surgery.<span>Methods</span>: In this study, the feasibility of robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery was assessed by performing 40 laparoscopic cholecystectomies with the da Vinci™ robotic system. Time necessary for system set-up and operation was recorded, as well as complications, technical problems, postoperative hospital stay, morbidity and mortality.<span>Results</span>: 39/40 procedures were completed laparoscopically with the da Vinci™ system. There were no intraoperative complications and only minor technical problems. Median hospitalization was 2 days. System set-up time decreased with increasing experience of the operating team. Operating time was at least comparable to times reported for standard laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the literature. There was neither postoperative mortality nor morbidity at the time of discharge and during short-term follow-up.<span>Conclusions</span>: Robot-assisted surgery was repeatedly proven as a safe and feasible approach to laparoscopic cholecystectomy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50475,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Surgery-Acta Chirurgica Austriaca\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2008-10-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1046/j.1563-2563.2002.02038.x\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Surgery-Acta Chirurgica Austriaca\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1046/j.1563-2563.2002.02038.x\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Surgery-Acta Chirurgica Austriaca","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1046/j.1563-2563.2002.02038.x","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

摘要:背景:腹腔镜手术为患者提供了明显的好处,但在器械的可操作性和手术视野的可视化方面给外科医生带来了负担。机器人遥控操作系统的引入为这些问题提供了一个解决方案。方法:在本研究中,通过使用达芬奇™机器人系统进行40例腹腔镜胆囊切除术,评估机器人辅助腹腔镜手术的可行性。记录了系统设置和操作所需的时间,以及并发症、技术问题、术后住院时间、发病率和死亡率。结果:39/40例手术在腹腔镜下使用达芬奇系统完成。没有术中并发症,只有一些小的技术问题。中位住院时间为2天。系统设置时间随着操作团队经验的增加而减少。手术时间至少与文献中报道的标准腹腔镜胆囊切除术的时间相当。出院时和短期随访期间均无术后死亡率和发病率。结论:机器人辅助手术是一种安全可行的腹腔镜胆囊切除术方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Robotic Surgery in a Routine ProcedureAn Evaluation of 40 Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Cholecystectomies Die Anwendung des Operationsroboters bei einem allgemeinchirurgischen Routineeingriff– so belassen –Erfahrungen nach 40 Roboter-assistierten Cholezystektomien

Summary: Background: Laparoscopic surgery offers distinct benefits to patients but places a burden on surgeons regarding manoeuvrability of instruments and visualization of the operating field. The introduction of robotic telemanipulation systems offers a solution to these problems in videoscopic surgery.Methods: In this study, the feasibility of robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery was assessed by performing 40 laparoscopic cholecystectomies with the da Vinci™ robotic system. Time necessary for system set-up and operation was recorded, as well as complications, technical problems, postoperative hospital stay, morbidity and mortality.Results: 39/40 procedures were completed laparoscopically with the da Vinci™ system. There were no intraoperative complications and only minor technical problems. Median hospitalization was 2 days. System set-up time decreased with increasing experience of the operating team. Operating time was at least comparable to times reported for standard laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the literature. There was neither postoperative mortality nor morbidity at the time of discharge and during short-term follow-up.Conclusions: Robot-assisted surgery was repeatedly proven as a safe and feasible approach to laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
36
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal European Surgery – Acta Chirurgica Austriaca focuses on general surgery, endocrine surgery, thoracic surgery, heart and vascular surgery. Special features include new surgical and endoscopic techniques such as minimally invasive surgery, robot surgery, and advances in surgery-related biotechnology and surgical oncology. The journal especially addresses benign and malignant esophageal diseases, i.e. achalasia, gastroesophageal reflux disease, Barrett’s esophagus, and esophageal adenocarcinoma. In keeping with modern healthcare requirements, the journal’s scope includes inter- and multidisciplinary disease management (diagnosis, therapy and surveillance).
期刊最新文献
Remote training and evaluation of a simulator-based training course for complex endovascular procedures. Training in vascular trauma surgery for non-vascular surgeons: Vascular trauma surgery skills course. Coping with a lack of evidence: living-donor kidney transplantation in the initial phase of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. 63rd Annual Meeting of the Austrian Society of Surgery. Delayed presentation of inflammatory breast carcinoma during the COVID-19 pandemic.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1