从实验室到日常生活:初步证据表明,随着时间的推移,自我疏离训练可以缓冲脆弱个体的日常沉思和抑郁。

IF 1.4 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL Psychology of Consciousness-Theory Research and Practice Pub Date : 2022-03-28 DOI:10.1037/cns0000323
A. Orvell, Emma Bruehlman-Senecal, Brian Vickers, E. Kross, Özlem Ayduk
{"title":"从实验室到日常生活:初步证据表明,随着时间的推移,自我疏离训练可以缓冲脆弱个体的日常沉思和抑郁。","authors":"A. Orvell, Emma Bruehlman-Senecal, Brian Vickers, E. Kross, Özlem Ayduk","doi":"10.1037/cns0000323","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Experimental research indicates that self-distancing helps vulnerable individuals to cope with negative experiences. However, whether these fi ndings generalize outside the laboratory is unknown. Here, we report the results of a proof-of-principle study ( N = 111) that assessed whether teaching people how to self-distance during a brief (i.e., ∼ 1 hr) computer-delivered, in-laboratory training session would facilitate adaptive coping in the short term and over time compared to a no treatment control and active control (relaxation) condition. Ten days following the intervention, vulnerable participants in the self-distancing group (but not the active control or no treatment control groups) displayed levels of rumination and negative affect that were on par with their less vulnerable counterparts. At 3 and 6 months after the training, vulnerable participants in both the self-distancing group and the active control group reported lower levels of depressive symptoms (but not rumination) compared to vulnerable participants in the no treatment control group. These fi ndings provide preliminary evidence indicating that training vulnerable individuals to self-distance is bene fi cial. Future research is needed to replicate these fi ndings with larger samples and to examine whether they generalize to clinical samples.","PeriodicalId":52129,"journal":{"name":"Psychology of Consciousness-Theory Research and Practice","volume":"27 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"From the laboratory to daily life: Preliminary evidence that self-distancing training buffers vulnerable individuals against daily rumination and depression over time.\",\"authors\":\"A. Orvell, Emma Bruehlman-Senecal, Brian Vickers, E. Kross, Özlem Ayduk\",\"doi\":\"10.1037/cns0000323\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Experimental research indicates that self-distancing helps vulnerable individuals to cope with negative experiences. However, whether these fi ndings generalize outside the laboratory is unknown. Here, we report the results of a proof-of-principle study ( N = 111) that assessed whether teaching people how to self-distance during a brief (i.e., ∼ 1 hr) computer-delivered, in-laboratory training session would facilitate adaptive coping in the short term and over time compared to a no treatment control and active control (relaxation) condition. Ten days following the intervention, vulnerable participants in the self-distancing group (but not the active control or no treatment control groups) displayed levels of rumination and negative affect that were on par with their less vulnerable counterparts. At 3 and 6 months after the training, vulnerable participants in both the self-distancing group and the active control group reported lower levels of depressive symptoms (but not rumination) compared to vulnerable participants in the no treatment control group. These fi ndings provide preliminary evidence indicating that training vulnerable individuals to self-distance is bene fi cial. Future research is needed to replicate these fi ndings with larger samples and to examine whether they generalize to clinical samples.\",\"PeriodicalId\":52129,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychology of Consciousness-Theory Research and Practice\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychology of Consciousness-Theory Research and Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1037/cns0000323\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychology of Consciousness-Theory Research and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/cns0000323","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

实验研究表明,自我疏离有助于脆弱的个体应对负面经历。然而,这些发现是否能推广到实验室之外还不得而知。在这里,我们报告了一项原理验证研究(N = 111)的结果,该研究评估了与无治疗控制和主动控制(放松)条件相比,在一个简短的(即约1小时)计算机提供的实验室培训课程中教授人们如何自我距离,是否会在短期内和随着时间的推移促进适应性应对。干预10天后,自我疏离组的弱势参与者(但不包括积极对照组或无治疗对照组)表现出的反刍和负面情绪水平与不那么脆弱的参与者相当。在训练后3个月和6个月,自我疏离组和积极控制组的弱势参与者报告的抑郁症状(但不反刍)水平低于未接受治疗控制组的弱势参与者。这些发现提供了初步的证据,表明训练易感个体自我距离是有益的。未来的研究需要在更大的样本中复制这些发现,并检查它们是否适用于临床样本。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
From the laboratory to daily life: Preliminary evidence that self-distancing training buffers vulnerable individuals against daily rumination and depression over time.
Experimental research indicates that self-distancing helps vulnerable individuals to cope with negative experiences. However, whether these fi ndings generalize outside the laboratory is unknown. Here, we report the results of a proof-of-principle study ( N = 111) that assessed whether teaching people how to self-distance during a brief (i.e., ∼ 1 hr) computer-delivered, in-laboratory training session would facilitate adaptive coping in the short term and over time compared to a no treatment control and active control (relaxation) condition. Ten days following the intervention, vulnerable participants in the self-distancing group (but not the active control or no treatment control groups) displayed levels of rumination and negative affect that were on par with their less vulnerable counterparts. At 3 and 6 months after the training, vulnerable participants in both the self-distancing group and the active control group reported lower levels of depressive symptoms (but not rumination) compared to vulnerable participants in the no treatment control group. These fi ndings provide preliminary evidence indicating that training vulnerable individuals to self-distance is bene fi cial. Future research is needed to replicate these fi ndings with larger samples and to examine whether they generalize to clinical samples.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
10.00%
发文量
45
期刊最新文献
Supplemental Material for Autonomous Sensory Meridian Response (ASMR): A PRISMA-Guided Systematic Review Sensory-processing sensitivity as a confounder in the positive relationship between mindful awareness and psychological distress: A theoretical review. Autonomous sensory meridian response (ASMR): A PRISMA-guided systematic review. Be careful what you wish for: Acceptance of Laplacean Determinism commits one to belief in precognition. The core of me is that which observes: A mixed-methods study of trait-level sense of self.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1