主动脉内球囊泵送在冠状动脉搭桥手术患者中的应用

Peter D. Skillington FRACS , Suchart Chaiyaroj MD , Timothy C. McKenzie FRACS
{"title":"主动脉内球囊泵送在冠状动脉搭桥手术患者中的应用","authors":"Peter D. Skillington FRACS ,&nbsp;Suchart Chaiyaroj MD ,&nbsp;Timothy C. McKenzie FRACS","doi":"10.1016/1037-2091(93)90050-E","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) is an effective, minimally invasive cardiac assist device which can be used perioperatively to increase survival after cardiac surgery. Surgeons vary according to how aggressively they use IABP. Some prefer to use increased doses of inotropic drugs in the first instance. From August 1990 to February 1993, 38 of 480 consecutive patients having cardiac surgery for ischaemic heart disease (IHD) had perioperative insertion of the IABP (usage rate 7.9%). There was a low threshold for its use, with some IABPs being placed in patients prophylactically in the operating theatre if postoperative low cardiac output was anticipated. Generally, if inotropic medication was required (greater than renal dosage dopamine) when the patient left the operating theatre, the IABP was inserted, and an attempt made to minimise inotropic medication. The IABP was more commonly inserted for complex coronary cases (40% of 55 patients) than when a primary coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) was performed (3.8% of 425 patients). The early mortality overall was 1 % and in the IABP group was 5.3%. There were 2 late deaths. IABP-related morbidity was infrequent (one false aneurysm of femoral artery requiring repair, one burst balloon requiring open removal via a groin incision). Complications were more commonly patient related. Using this approach, the mortality was 3.6% for complex coronary surgery and 0.7% for first time CABG. Inotropic medication was required in only 10% of patients, and in 68% of these, low dosage only was necessary.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101220,"journal":{"name":"The AustralAsian Journal of Cardiac and Thoracic Surgery","volume":"2 2","pages":"Pages 73-76"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1993-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/1037-2091(93)90050-E","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Liberal use of intra-aortic balloon pumping in patients undergoing coronary bypass surgery\",\"authors\":\"Peter D. Skillington FRACS ,&nbsp;Suchart Chaiyaroj MD ,&nbsp;Timothy C. McKenzie FRACS\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/1037-2091(93)90050-E\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) is an effective, minimally invasive cardiac assist device which can be used perioperatively to increase survival after cardiac surgery. Surgeons vary according to how aggressively they use IABP. Some prefer to use increased doses of inotropic drugs in the first instance. From August 1990 to February 1993, 38 of 480 consecutive patients having cardiac surgery for ischaemic heart disease (IHD) had perioperative insertion of the IABP (usage rate 7.9%). There was a low threshold for its use, with some IABPs being placed in patients prophylactically in the operating theatre if postoperative low cardiac output was anticipated. Generally, if inotropic medication was required (greater than renal dosage dopamine) when the patient left the operating theatre, the IABP was inserted, and an attempt made to minimise inotropic medication. The IABP was more commonly inserted for complex coronary cases (40% of 55 patients) than when a primary coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) was performed (3.8% of 425 patients). The early mortality overall was 1 % and in the IABP group was 5.3%. There were 2 late deaths. IABP-related morbidity was infrequent (one false aneurysm of femoral artery requiring repair, one burst balloon requiring open removal via a groin incision). Complications were more commonly patient related. Using this approach, the mortality was 3.6% for complex coronary surgery and 0.7% for first time CABG. Inotropic medication was required in only 10% of patients, and in 68% of these, low dosage only was necessary.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101220,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The AustralAsian Journal of Cardiac and Thoracic Surgery\",\"volume\":\"2 2\",\"pages\":\"Pages 73-76\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1993-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/1037-2091(93)90050-E\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The AustralAsian Journal of Cardiac and Thoracic Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/103720919390050E\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The AustralAsian Journal of Cardiac and Thoracic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/103720919390050E","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

主动脉内球囊泵(IABP)是一种有效的微创心脏辅助装置,可以在围手术期使用,以提高心脏手术后的生存率。外科医生根据他们使用IABP的力度而有所不同。有些人更喜欢在第一时间使用增加剂量的肌力药物。从1990年8月到1993年2月,连续480例因缺血性心脏病(IHD)接受心脏手术的患者中有38例围手术期插入IABP(使用率为7.9%)。它的使用门槛很低,如果预计术后心输出量低,一些iabp在手术室被预防性地放置在患者身上。一般来说,如果患者离开手术室时需要肌力药物治疗(大于肾脏多巴胺剂量),则插入IABP,并尝试减少肌力药物治疗。IABP更常用于复杂冠状动脉病例(55例患者中40%),而非进行一次冠状动脉旁路移植术(425例患者中3.8%)。早期死亡率总体为1%,IABP组为5.3%。有2人晚死。与iabp相关的发病率并不多见(一例假性股动脉动脉瘤需要修复,一例球囊破裂需要通过腹股沟切口切开切除)。并发症更常与患者相关。采用这种方法,复杂冠状动脉手术的死亡率为3.6%,首次冠脉搭桥的死亡率为0.7%。只有10%的患者需要肌力药物治疗,其中68%的患者只需要低剂量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Liberal use of intra-aortic balloon pumping in patients undergoing coronary bypass surgery

The intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) is an effective, minimally invasive cardiac assist device which can be used perioperatively to increase survival after cardiac surgery. Surgeons vary according to how aggressively they use IABP. Some prefer to use increased doses of inotropic drugs in the first instance. From August 1990 to February 1993, 38 of 480 consecutive patients having cardiac surgery for ischaemic heart disease (IHD) had perioperative insertion of the IABP (usage rate 7.9%). There was a low threshold for its use, with some IABPs being placed in patients prophylactically in the operating theatre if postoperative low cardiac output was anticipated. Generally, if inotropic medication was required (greater than renal dosage dopamine) when the patient left the operating theatre, the IABP was inserted, and an attempt made to minimise inotropic medication. The IABP was more commonly inserted for complex coronary cases (40% of 55 patients) than when a primary coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) was performed (3.8% of 425 patients). The early mortality overall was 1 % and in the IABP group was 5.3%. There were 2 late deaths. IABP-related morbidity was infrequent (one false aneurysm of femoral artery requiring repair, one burst balloon requiring open removal via a groin incision). Complications were more commonly patient related. Using this approach, the mortality was 3.6% for complex coronary surgery and 0.7% for first time CABG. Inotropic medication was required in only 10% of patients, and in 68% of these, low dosage only was necessary.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Intrapericardial teratoma presenting as recurrent cardiac tamponade in a neonate Modified method of early repair of postinfarction ventricular septal defect using fibrin sealant Concerning health for all humanity The promise Of cardioscopic surgery A new technique for relaxing the saphenous vein during harvesting for coronary bypass grafting
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1