在新的2021-2027年多年度金融框架背景下的欧盟凝聚力政策改革:中欧和东欧相互依存的2020年后前景研究

IF 0.6 4区 经济学 Q4 ECONOMICS Argumenta Oeconomica Pub Date : 2021-03-01 DOI:10.24818/oec/2021/30/1.03
Bianca-Georgiana Petre
{"title":"在新的2021-2027年多年度金融框架背景下的欧盟凝聚力政策改革:中欧和东欧相互依存的2020年后前景研究","authors":"Bianca-Georgiana Petre","doi":"10.24818/oec/2021/30/1.03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the midst of competing demands triggered by historical decisions and novel challenges of the 21st century, the EU’s long-term budget is once again expected to capitalize on its finite resources in the most efficient manner. In the context of the 2021-2027 Multiannual Financial Framework (MFF), which has been situated at the heart of a long-standing debate on “the future of Europe”, this research study investigates the impact of the reform of the EU Cohesion Policy on the ongoing process of EU integration of six Member States in Central and Eastern Europe (CEE), in terms of their expected fragmentation or interdependence. This main research objective is complemented by a secondary ambition of assessing whether this EU investment instrument will facilitate their digital transformation in the post-2020 programming period. Thus, this paper challenges the reader with a change of perspective from the traditionally scrutinized East-West divide to the potential internal divisions within CEE-6, a subgroup of the Friends of Cohesion. By means of a case study, the analysis unveils a disintegration tendency, given the different country-specific positions towards the EU values and their respective national interests, which are expected to complicate the Member States’ compliance with the revised regulatory framework of the Cohesion Policy. As for their digital transformation, the future Regional Policy appears to be a step forward in the right direction, due to a higher thematic concentration on innovation. The research study concludes with a series of three policy recommendations, in view of preventing the evolution of the remarked fragmentation trend.","PeriodicalId":43088,"journal":{"name":"Argumenta Oeconomica","volume":"50 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reform of the EU Cohesion Policy in the Context of the New 2021-2027 Multiannual Financial Framework: A Study on the Post-2020 Prospects of Central and Eastern European Interdependence\",\"authors\":\"Bianca-Georgiana Petre\",\"doi\":\"10.24818/oec/2021/30/1.03\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In the midst of competing demands triggered by historical decisions and novel challenges of the 21st century, the EU’s long-term budget is once again expected to capitalize on its finite resources in the most efficient manner. In the context of the 2021-2027 Multiannual Financial Framework (MFF), which has been situated at the heart of a long-standing debate on “the future of Europe”, this research study investigates the impact of the reform of the EU Cohesion Policy on the ongoing process of EU integration of six Member States in Central and Eastern Europe (CEE), in terms of their expected fragmentation or interdependence. This main research objective is complemented by a secondary ambition of assessing whether this EU investment instrument will facilitate their digital transformation in the post-2020 programming period. Thus, this paper challenges the reader with a change of perspective from the traditionally scrutinized East-West divide to the potential internal divisions within CEE-6, a subgroup of the Friends of Cohesion. By means of a case study, the analysis unveils a disintegration tendency, given the different country-specific positions towards the EU values and their respective national interests, which are expected to complicate the Member States’ compliance with the revised regulatory framework of the Cohesion Policy. As for their digital transformation, the future Regional Policy appears to be a step forward in the right direction, due to a higher thematic concentration on innovation. The research study concludes with a series of three policy recommendations, in view of preventing the evolution of the remarked fragmentation trend.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43088,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Argumenta Oeconomica\",\"volume\":\"50 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Argumenta Oeconomica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24818/oec/2021/30/1.03\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Argumenta Oeconomica","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24818/oec/2021/30/1.03","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在历史决定和21世纪的新挑战引发的竞争需求中,欧盟的长期预算再次被期望以最有效的方式利用其有限的资源。在2021-2027年多年度金融框架(MFF)的背景下,该框架一直处于关于“欧洲未来”的长期辩论的核心,本研究调查了欧盟凝聚力政策改革对中欧和东欧(CEE)六个成员国正在进行的欧盟一体化进程的影响,就其预期的分裂或相互依存而言。作为这一主要研究目标的补充,还有一个次要目标,即评估这一欧盟投资工具是否会促进其在2020年后规划期间的数字化转型。因此,本文向读者提出了挑战,从传统上仔细审视的东西方分裂转变为中欧-六(凝聚力之友的一个分支)内部潜在的分裂。通过案例研究,分析揭示了一种解体趋势,考虑到不同国家对欧盟价值观和各自国家利益的具体立场,这将使成员国遵守修订后的凝聚力政策监管框架复杂化。至于他们的数字化转型,未来的区域政策似乎朝着正确的方向迈出了一步,因为创新的主题更加集中。为了防止上述碎片化趋势的演变,本研究最后提出了一系列的三项政策建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Reform of the EU Cohesion Policy in the Context of the New 2021-2027 Multiannual Financial Framework: A Study on the Post-2020 Prospects of Central and Eastern European Interdependence
In the midst of competing demands triggered by historical decisions and novel challenges of the 21st century, the EU’s long-term budget is once again expected to capitalize on its finite resources in the most efficient manner. In the context of the 2021-2027 Multiannual Financial Framework (MFF), which has been situated at the heart of a long-standing debate on “the future of Europe”, this research study investigates the impact of the reform of the EU Cohesion Policy on the ongoing process of EU integration of six Member States in Central and Eastern Europe (CEE), in terms of their expected fragmentation or interdependence. This main research objective is complemented by a secondary ambition of assessing whether this EU investment instrument will facilitate their digital transformation in the post-2020 programming period. Thus, this paper challenges the reader with a change of perspective from the traditionally scrutinized East-West divide to the potential internal divisions within CEE-6, a subgroup of the Friends of Cohesion. By means of a case study, the analysis unveils a disintegration tendency, given the different country-specific positions towards the EU values and their respective national interests, which are expected to complicate the Member States’ compliance with the revised regulatory framework of the Cohesion Policy. As for their digital transformation, the future Regional Policy appears to be a step forward in the right direction, due to a higher thematic concentration on innovation. The research study concludes with a series of three policy recommendations, in view of preventing the evolution of the remarked fragmentation trend.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
2
期刊最新文献
ANT COLONY OPTIMIZATION: AN ECONOMIC TRANSPOSITION The Post-Covid Crisis and Its Effects on Education Nobel Laureate, Joseph Stiglitz, On Economic Challenges after Covid-19 Circularity – an Essential Component in the Transition Towards Climatic Neutrality Main Categories of Operational Risks in Banking. Methods Used by Financial Institutions to Identify, Prevent and Mitigate Risk Events
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1