股骨近端钉与半关节置换术治疗高龄(80岁以上)股骨粗隆间骨折的疗效比较

A. Şişman, Ş. Şavk, S. Çepni
{"title":"股骨近端钉与半关节置换术治疗高龄(80岁以上)股骨粗隆间骨折的疗效比较","authors":"A. Şişman, Ş. Şavk, S. Çepni","doi":"10.25000/ACEM.800692","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: Proximal femoral nail (PFNA) and hemiarthroplasty are the two most frequently used methods in the surgical treatment of intertrochanteric femur fractures. The study aimed to determine the priority choice for surgical treatment in elderly patients (over 80 years old). Methods: Patients treated for intertrochanteric femur fractures between 2012 and 2017 were retrospectively analyzed. Patients aged 80 years and over who were treated with hemiarthroplasty or PFNA were included in the study. Length of the operation, need for postoperative intensive care, Harris Hip Score, postoperative complications, and mortality rates in the first year were compared. Results: A total of 120 patients with intertrochanteric femur fractures older than 80 years were evaluated. There were 43 patients (35.8) in the hemiarthroplasty group and 77 (64.2) in the PFNA group. No significant differences were found between the two groups in terms of mortality, need for postoperative intensive care, Harris Hip Score, and postoperative complications in the first year. While the median operation time was 45 minutes (IQR 40-50) in the PFNA group, it was 80 minutes (IQR 75-85) in the hemiarthroplasty group (p <0.001). The length of the operation was shorter in the PFNA group. Conclusion: In elderly patients, there were no significant differences between the surgical treatment modalities as hemiarthroplasty and PFNA in treating intertrochanteric fractures considering the postoperative outcomes and mortality rates within the first year. However, shorter operation time might be an advantage of PFNA.","PeriodicalId":8220,"journal":{"name":"ARCHIVES OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE","volume":"9 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of proximal femoral nail and hemiarthroplasty outcomes in elderly (over 80 years old) patients with intertrochanteric fractures\",\"authors\":\"A. Şişman, Ş. Şavk, S. Çepni\",\"doi\":\"10.25000/ACEM.800692\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Aim: Proximal femoral nail (PFNA) and hemiarthroplasty are the two most frequently used methods in the surgical treatment of intertrochanteric femur fractures. The study aimed to determine the priority choice for surgical treatment in elderly patients (over 80 years old). Methods: Patients treated for intertrochanteric femur fractures between 2012 and 2017 were retrospectively analyzed. Patients aged 80 years and over who were treated with hemiarthroplasty or PFNA were included in the study. Length of the operation, need for postoperative intensive care, Harris Hip Score, postoperative complications, and mortality rates in the first year were compared. Results: A total of 120 patients with intertrochanteric femur fractures older than 80 years were evaluated. There were 43 patients (35.8) in the hemiarthroplasty group and 77 (64.2) in the PFNA group. No significant differences were found between the two groups in terms of mortality, need for postoperative intensive care, Harris Hip Score, and postoperative complications in the first year. While the median operation time was 45 minutes (IQR 40-50) in the PFNA group, it was 80 minutes (IQR 75-85) in the hemiarthroplasty group (p <0.001). The length of the operation was shorter in the PFNA group. Conclusion: In elderly patients, there were no significant differences between the surgical treatment modalities as hemiarthroplasty and PFNA in treating intertrochanteric fractures considering the postoperative outcomes and mortality rates within the first year. However, shorter operation time might be an advantage of PFNA.\",\"PeriodicalId\":8220,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ARCHIVES OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-03-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ARCHIVES OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.25000/ACEM.800692\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ARCHIVES OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25000/ACEM.800692","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:股骨近端髓内钉(PFNA)和半关节置换术是股骨粗隆间骨折手术治疗中最常用的两种方法。本研究旨在确定老年患者(80岁以上)手术治疗的优先选择。方法:回顾性分析2012 ~ 2017年收治的股骨粗隆间骨折患者。80岁及以上接受半关节置换术或PFNA治疗的患者被纳入研究。比较手术时间、术后重症监护需求、Harris髋关节评分、术后并发症和第一年死亡率。结果:共对120例80岁以上股骨粗隆间骨折患者进行了评估。半关节置换术组43例(35.8例),PFNA组77例(64.2例)。两组在第一年的死亡率、术后重症监护需求、Harris髋关节评分和术后并发症方面均无显著差异。PFNA组的中位手术时间为45分钟(IQR 40-50),半关节置换术组的中位手术时间为80分钟(IQR 75-85) (p <0.001)。PFNA组手术时间较短。结论:在老年患者中,半关节置换术与PFNA治疗粗隆间骨折的手术治疗方式在术后疗效和第一年死亡率方面无显著差异。然而,较短的手术时间可能是PFNA的优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparison of proximal femoral nail and hemiarthroplasty outcomes in elderly (over 80 years old) patients with intertrochanteric fractures
Aim: Proximal femoral nail (PFNA) and hemiarthroplasty are the two most frequently used methods in the surgical treatment of intertrochanteric femur fractures. The study aimed to determine the priority choice for surgical treatment in elderly patients (over 80 years old). Methods: Patients treated for intertrochanteric femur fractures between 2012 and 2017 were retrospectively analyzed. Patients aged 80 years and over who were treated with hemiarthroplasty or PFNA were included in the study. Length of the operation, need for postoperative intensive care, Harris Hip Score, postoperative complications, and mortality rates in the first year were compared. Results: A total of 120 patients with intertrochanteric femur fractures older than 80 years were evaluated. There were 43 patients (35.8) in the hemiarthroplasty group and 77 (64.2) in the PFNA group. No significant differences were found between the two groups in terms of mortality, need for postoperative intensive care, Harris Hip Score, and postoperative complications in the first year. While the median operation time was 45 minutes (IQR 40-50) in the PFNA group, it was 80 minutes (IQR 75-85) in the hemiarthroplasty group (p <0.001). The length of the operation was shorter in the PFNA group. Conclusion: In elderly patients, there were no significant differences between the surgical treatment modalities as hemiarthroplasty and PFNA in treating intertrochanteric fractures considering the postoperative outcomes and mortality rates within the first year. However, shorter operation time might be an advantage of PFNA.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Ferric Carboxymaltose Versus Ferrous Glycine Sulfate For Treatment of Iron Deficiency Anemia and Their Effect On Vitamin B12 And Folic Acid: A Retrospective Study Comparison of The Short-Term Effects of Intragastric Balloon and Botulinum Toxin Injection On Weight Loss Evaluation Of Urological Emergency Cases Admitted To Emergency Department Effects Of Surgical And Medical Treatments On Stress Urinary Incontinence Effects of Exercise On Coronary Flow Reserve And Biochemical Parameters in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1